Qing,
The reason for which I posted this note here was to get *technical*
input on the contents of the I-D.
So far 99% of the discussion in TCPM has been around whether to accept
this document as a wg item or not, whether to change the outline or not,
etc. (i.e., procedural discussions, if you
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Freebsd 8 stable amd64
It mounts different file systems by NFS (with locking) on a
data server directly connected (gigabit) to the server
Apache running in a several jails on those nfs folders.
Now and then I get huge slow-down. When I look in the logs
I get thousand of lines like these:
Mar
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:26, dougb@ wrote:
Oops, missed one.
Doug
;) Hi Doug everyone,
Personally I think that ipv6_enable could be skipped(removed) all-in-all.
Here is my reason:
It seems needless to have if, the value of ipv6_network_interfaces could
just be checked against to see if
Synopsis: [fxp] The fxp driver does not handle Frame Check Sequence (CRC)
errors correctly.
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 8 18:46:31 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
I don't think 7.1-RELEASE has enhancements made by me so it may
have some
Hello.
I've a couple of 7.2p7 servers (one i386, the other amd64) which are
working in parallel using CARP.
Recently I bonded two interfaces on the former and CARP stopped working.
Here's the relevant part from rc.conf on the first box:
ifconfig_em0=up
ifconfig_em1=up
ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a
interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface.
Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since the day 0.
Could anyone shed some light, why we need to enforce
On 3/8/2010 5:43 AM, jhell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:26, dougb@ wrote:
Oops, missed one.
Doug
;) Hi Doug everyone,
Personally I think that ipv6_enable could be skipped(removed) all-in-all.
Here is my reason:
It seems needless to have if, the value of ipv6_network_interfaces could
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a
interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface.
Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since
Old Synopsis: mld sends packets to wrong destination with a bad checksum
New Synopsis: [patch] mld sends packets to wrong destination with a bad checksum
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 8 19:44:38 UTC 2010
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
Hi,
As we've previously discussed, I would like to un-obsolete ipv6_enable,
and return it to the status of being the knob that actually controls
whether or not we configure IPv6. My understanding is that the consensus
is in agreement with this change,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a
interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be
Old Synopsis: ixgbe driver errors
New Synopsis: [patch] ixgbe driver errors
Class-Changed-From-To: change-request-sw-bug
Class-Changed-By: brucec
Class-Changed-When: Mon Mar 8 20:30:13 UTC 2010
Class-Changed-Why:
Bug.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
The following reply was made to PR kern/144494; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: vol...@vwsoft.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, john.giacom...@lineratesystems.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/144494: [ixgbe] ixgbe driver not built as module
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:26:54 +0100
This is a
Synopsis: lltable grows too much
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: brucec
State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 8 21:43:10 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Could you explain how the machine's being used, what firewall if any is loaded,
what tasks it's running etc.? Without more details
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4b945aa7.6070...@freebsd.org:
do As we've previously discussed, I would like to un-obsolete ipv6_enable,
do and return it to the status of being the knob that actually controls
do whether or not we configure IPv6. My understanding is that the consensus
do
On 03/08/10 12:16, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Freebsd 8 stable amd64
It mounts different file systems by NFS (with locking) on a
data server directly connected (gigabit) to the server
Apache running in a several jails on those nfs folders.
Now and then I get huge slow-down. When I look in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, David,
On 2010/03/08 12:03, David Horn wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe this
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4b945aa7.6070...@freebsd.org:
do As we've previously discussed, I would like to un-obsolete ipv6_enable,
do and return it to the status of being the knob that actually controls
do
David Horn dhorn2...@gmail.com wrote
in 25ff90d61003082037v3519995bx7e119e9d14143...@mail.gmail.com:
dh The question is what is the desired end-state for the rc.conf
dh configuration of ipv6 ?
dh
dh Do we want to have a per-interface setting required to enable ipv6 SLAAC ?
dh Do we want to have
Synopsis: [libc] lltable grows too much
State-Changed-From-To: feedback-open
State-Changed-By: brucec
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 9 07:18:55 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback was received.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144564
___
21 matches
Mail list logo
