On 07.09.2012 23:44, Jeremiah Lott wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:07 AM, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
Old Synopsis: sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC New
Synopsis:
[netinet] [patch] sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 6 сентября 2012 г., 22:12:04:
AC On 6 September 2012 11:11, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 6 сентября 2012 г., 22:07:08:
AC Oh don't worry about polling just yet. I just want to see what
AC preempt/no-preempt does with ULE and 4BSD
Hi all,
I have a network with two gateways. GW1 is primary gateway and GW2 is
secondary.
I need to be able to map GW2 port to a service inside of my network. That
is done using redirect_port NAT directive but the problem is that all
computers inside the network have a default gateway pointing to
On 11/09/2012 22:03, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
Hi!
Here's what I got seconds prior/while it happened this morning:
got message of size 24 on Wed Sep 12 00:15:49 2012
RTM_IFANNOUNCE: interface arrival/departure: len 24, if# 37, what: arrival
got message of size 168 on Wed Sep 12 00:15:49 2012
RTM_IFINFO: iface status change: len 168, if# 37,
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:02:20PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
[...]
The last patch makes it possible for a transport mode client to open a
new connection to the server immediately after closing an old
connection. Without this patch the client must wait for the routers to
forget all
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
wrote:
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x
compared to 9.0.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:34:57PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi,
we (me and Bjoern) would like to establish a single place
for all kinds of pfil(9) consumers, for current ones and
for future as well.
The place chosen is sys/netpfil.
On first round we'd like to move there our
got message of size 184 on Wed Sep 12 00:15:49 2012
RTM_DELETE: Delete Route: len 184, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0,
flags:UP,GATEWAY,STATIC
locks: inits:
sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK
default default default ### - This looks normal, I
usually see it when customers connect to
V
V Could this be
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/in.c?r1=226120r2=22622
4pathrev=226331
Why do you suspect this one?
I was hitting a similar issue in 8.2. After down/up on the interface
to the default gateway, I saw this message and arpresolve would never
igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0
and 9-STABLE on those three boxes.
igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if
non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just
the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode
Hi -net!
I've been doing some IPv6 testing lately, and one of the issues
that I've run into in the past (since at least 7.0-CURRENT) is that if
I do `service netif restart foo`, e.g. `service netif restart`
multiple times, and have addresses statically configured in rc.conf,
more often than
I have the ndis based driver preloaded during boot. It creates ndis0
interface.
/etc/rc.conf has the following lines:
wlans_ndis0=wlan0
ifconfig_wlan0=WPA DHCP
However, wlan0 device isn't being created during system boot or during
'/etc/rc.d/netif start'.
'/etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant start' also
On 09/12/2012 18:59, Glen Barber wrote:
What is 'uname -a'?
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.org 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 9
19:29:05 PDT 2012 x...@xxx.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I'm surprised you can have ndis(4) load during boot. Recent machines I
tried to do that have
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:58:20PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
I'm surprised you can have ndis(4) load during boot. Recent machines I
tried to do that have panic'd during boot.
I have these lines in /boot/loader.conf and if_ndis and ndis(4) based
driver load fine:
I understand that.
What you
18 matches
Mail list logo
