On 10/19/12 4:25 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi All,
Many years ago i have already proposed this feature, but at that time
several people were against, because as they said, it could affect
performance. Now, when we have high speed network adapters, SMP kernel
and network stack, several
On Monday 22 October 2012 23:43:11 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
I don't mind tackling the net80211 clone detach path.
I do mind how the default for hotplug is argh, it doesn't work. :-)
So I'd like to come up with something to fix the basic device detach,
rather than having to actually add
The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrey Simonenko si...@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:36:04 +0300
I optimized
On 23 October 2012 00:16, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote:
As already mentioned earlier, I don't terribly object if you'd place
CURVNET_SET(ifp-if_vnet) inside if_free() and a limited number of similar
functions, but I don't quite believe this is will enough to solve the
device_detach() issue
... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the tree?
The new ATF import would be ideal for this. :)
Adrian
On 23 October 2012 01:40, Andrey Simonenko si...@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS.
Hi folks, this is my first post to freebsd-net, and my first bug-fix
submission... I hope this is the right mailing list for this issue, and
the right format for sending in patches
I'm working on a derivative of FreeBSD 7.
I've run into a problem with IP header checksums when fragmenting to
On 24.10.2012 01:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
$work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
discovered that while ixgb's throughput
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Andre Oppermann opperm...@networx.ch wrote:
...
Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
$work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on
7.3/7.4,
It you mean the ixgbe driver please call it that, the IS an ixgb driver
which is for
VERY old PCI cards, from the context I assume you mean the newer hardware :)
Jack
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
It you mean the ixgbe driver please call it that, the IS an ixgb driver
which is for
VERY old PCI cards, from the context I assume you mean the newer hardware :)
Yeah... I meant ixgbe. Subject line fixed :).
Thanks!
10 matches
Mail list logo