Re: [RFC] Enabling IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in run-time

2012-10-23 Thread n j
On 10/19/12 4:25 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Hi All, Many years ago i have already proposed this feature, but at that time several people were against, because as they said, it could affect performance. Now, when we have high speed network adapters, SMP kernel and network stack, several

Re: VIMAGE crashes on 9.x with hotplug net80211 devices

2012-10-23 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 22 October 2012 23:43:11 Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, I don't mind tackling the net80211 clone detach path. I do mind how the default for hotplug is argh, it doesn't work. :-) So I'd like to come up with something to fix the basic device detach, rather than having to actually add

kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function

2012-10-23 Thread Andrey Simonenko
The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrey Simonenko si...@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:36:04 +0300 I optimized

Re: VIMAGE crashes on 9.x with hotplug net80211 devices

2012-10-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 23 October 2012 00:16, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: As already mentioned earlier, I don't terribly object if you'd place CURVNET_SET(ifp-if_vnet) inside if_free() and a limited number of similar functions, but I don't quite believe this is will enough to solve the device_detach() issue

Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function

2012-10-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the tree? The new ATF import would be ideal for this. :) Adrian On 23 October 2012 01:40, Andrey Simonenko si...@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua wrote: The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS.

fragmentation problem in FreeBSD 7

2012-10-23 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
Hi folks, this is my first post to freebsd-net, and my first bug-fix submission... I hope this is the right mailing list for this issue, and the right format for sending in patches I'm working on a derivative of FreeBSD 7. I've run into a problem with IP header checksums when fragmenting to

Re: ixgb TSO performance degrades by ~30% between 7.4 and 8.2/9.0/9.1

2012-10-23 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 24.10.2012 01:13, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I discovered that while ixgb's throughput

Re: ixgb TSO performance degrades by ~30% between 7.4 and 8.2/9.0/9.1

2012-10-23 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Andre Oppermann opperm...@networx.ch wrote: ... Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on 7.3/7.4,

Re: ixgb TSO performance degrades by ~30% between 7.4 and 8.2/9.0/9.1

2012-10-23 Thread Jack Vogel
It you mean the ixgbe driver please call it that, the IS an ixgb driver which is for VERY old PCI cards, from the context I assume you mean the newer hardware :) Jack On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver

Re: ixgbe TSO performance degrades by ~30% between 7.4 and 8.2/9.0/9.1

2012-10-23 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: It you mean the ixgbe driver please call it that, the IS an ixgb driver which is for VERY old PCI cards, from the context I assume you mean the newer hardware :) Yeah... I meant ixgbe. Subject line fixed :). Thanks!