On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:45:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
2013/4/14 Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org:
Do we honestly need three packet filters?
No, for me only one should be present. I completely understand that
some users still use IPFilter and IPFW but why providing three packet
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:07:11PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:19:54AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 24. May 2012, at 07:43 , sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
every now and then the issue comes up on whether we still need
to support non-contiguous masks in address
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:16:05AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Also related to my previous question on lookups, I believe some
ISPs may have a huge number of very small subnets (say /28 or
even smaller) attached to some kind of virtual interfaces
(vlans, gif, tun,...).
Can anyone comment on
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:37:27PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
I've looked through the list of network interfaces that are
supported with FreeBSD and none seem to meet my needs. What
I want is a network interface that I can configure up in
jail A with address 10.1.1.1 and for which I can
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:48:45AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
add pipe 1 tcp from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133
add pipe 2 tcp from 147.28.2.133 to 147.28.2.129
pipe 1 config queue 50 delay 200ms
pipe 2 config queue 50 delay 200ms
is a tcp packet from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133 delayed by
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:05:40PM +0200, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:47:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 11/10/10 12:04, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
Tried 2 queues and 1 queue per iface, neither
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:35:42AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I should say however that even this is going to produce a slightly sub-optimal
result, because (I guess) the DHCP client is _still_ going to wipe out my
eisting /etc/resolve.con file and then write its own. Now that will at
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:12:49AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I have been attempting to implment a trivial sort of TFTP client from
scratch, and its been somewhat of a humbling experience so far, and
its taught me that I don't know quite as much about BSD socket programming
as I though
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:40:29PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote
in 20110617022950.ga58...@dataix.net:
jh Gosh, Wouldnt it be something if we could store our dynamic resolver
jh information with the interface in the same sort of fashion that we store
jh our
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 04:54:47PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:00:53PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
Just an observation I made while transferring a file:
# time scp floppy.img somehost:
Password:
floppy.img100%
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Xavier HUMBERT wrote:
I've got some trouble routing vlans through FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE.
I had similar prolem in 8.0-STABLE. Try
sysctl net.inet.flowtable.enable=0
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:31:39PM +1000, Dave Seddon wrote:
It sounds like dedicating some space for this in the mbuf would be the
best way forward, but the question is how much. I'm worried that most
freebsd users won't go for lots of route tables, which is why you went
for 4 bits
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:06:46PM +1100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
you can set the limit for the pipe, create two queues with different
weights attached to the pipe, and then schedule.
ipfw pipe 12 config bw 3456 Kbit/s
ipfw queue 34 config weight 2 pipe 12
ipfw queue 56 config weight 1 pipe 12
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 08:54:10AM -0500, Jason Van Patten wrote:
> Hey gang -
>
> I posted this to the FreeBSD user forums but figured I'd send a message
> off to the list to see if anyone has any input, guidance, or ideas.
> Emailing diagrams around isn't good form (IMHO) but having a diagram
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:47:39PM +0100, bcs wrote:
> I have 3 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE machines and all of them suffers of the
> following problem. They are not responding to ARP requests which causes
> network problem for me, other hosts can't access my FBSD machines on the
> LAN nor my FBSD
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Julian K. wrote:
> is there anyone who wants to use MAC based rules with IPFW?
> I want to build a captive portal that also supports IPv6. MAC addresses
> in IPFW tables would help a lot.
I use MAC in IPFW and want MAC in IPFW tables to simplify rules.
ay/hash tabletype with the ability to do exact lookup on the
> source/destination mac address, w/o any masks support).
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <"."@babolo.ru> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Julian K. wrote
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:01:37PM +, org.freebsd.secur...@io7m.com wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been searching for the best part of a day for a solution to this
> problem and quite frankly cannot believe that I've spent this long on
> something that appears to be so simple and that used to be
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:04:36PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/5/18 2:02 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >01.05.2018 0:48, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
> >
> >> From time to time, I rewrite my firewall rules to take advantages of the
> >> ever-improving set of features that ipfw provides. One of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
