Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 17:39:52 Anonymous wrote:
IANAL, but I think LGPL3 is applicable here, too. So, I've tried to set
LICENSE= LGPL21+
but it doesn't work. I've figured this will work
LICENSE= LGPL21 LGPL3
LICENSE_COMB= dual
Is this correct usage or I'm
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
===Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
===Registering installation for db42-4.2.52_5
===Returning to build of amavisd-new-2.6.4_6,1
Error: shared library db-4.2.2 does not exist
*** Error code 1
Stop in
I'm trying to teach myself how to build a FreeBSD port and, with a lot
of help from the manual, it's going well. I have a question though
concerning policy/style.
I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two separate
packages from the upstream project. One package contains the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Smith wrote:
I'm trying to teach myself how to build a FreeBSD port and, with a lot
of help from the manual, it's going well. I have a question though
concerning policy/style.
I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:58:50 -0300
Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two separate
packages from the upstream project. One package contains the
executable program and the other contains data files. The Data
package rarely changes.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:17:46AM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Smith wrote:
I'm trying to teach myself how to build a FreeBSD port and, with a lot
of help from the manual, it's going well. I have a question though
concerning
--On Friday, June 11, 2010 10:58:50 -0300 Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
I'm trying to teach myself how to build a FreeBSD port and, with a lot
of help from the manual, it's going well. I have a question though
concerning policy/style.
I'm trying to port a program which is
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
=== Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
=== Registering installation for db42-4.2.52_5
=== Returning to build of amavisd-new-2.6.4_6,1
Error: shared library db-4.2.2
hi doug and list!
while upgrading libogg and libao (portmaster -x virtualbox -Rr libogg
libao) i've seen that some ports, which were already installed, got
reinstalled with a package. they're build dependencies of a port which
was upgraded, but they're also run dependencies of another one, so
they
Hei,
I just found deskutils/alexandria (0.6.5_3) and installed it. A very nice
program.
I have just one question: why does it create a directory (~/.alexandria)
with 777 permissions? Wouldn't it be more correct to use something like
740 or even 750?
Note: all subdirectories of said directory have
-Original Message-
From: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
To: Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org
Cc: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca, freebsd-ports
freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Data files and ports
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:41:45 +0300
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:17:46AM -0400,
FYI, I'm using gcc 4.5.1, the binutils port, and I did reinstall libtool
after gcc.
I'm on -current from April (r207134), and rebuilding qmake worked fine.
However the next qt4 port in line is qt4-moc, and it fails:
g++
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:29:18 -0300Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:41:45 +0300, Jesse Smith
wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replied. There were some good points made all
around. Let's say that I do decide to go with the idea of making the
Data files a separate port. How do I tell the Ports system not to try
Dear php5-mysqli port Maintainer,
I don't know whether you are aware of this .. and in case you are
not - I'd like to report that I cannot compile php5-mysqli-5.3.2_1
with the most recent portsnap fetch update on my FreeBSD box.
If I choose mysqli extension and want to compile
On 06/11/10 10:52, Alberto Villa wrote:
hi doug and list!
while upgrading libogg and libao (portmaster -x virtualbox -Rr libogg
libao) i've seen that some ports, which were already installed, got
reinstalled with a package. they're build dependencies of a port which
was upgraded, but they're
On Friday 11 June 2010 22:45:26 Doug Barton wrote:
The build-onlyness of a port is calculated per portmaster run, so
your
results are not unexpected, even if they are not desirable.
What needs to be done is to add code that tests whether ports
marked
build only for a given portmaster run
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 02:45, Bernardo Maciel bernardo.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 23:59, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Bernardo Maciel
bernardo.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently ran into a problem when compiling
17 matches
Mail list logo
