On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12:05AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
What is it that this Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ships in those 7 DVDs?
Please ask that on one of their mailing lists; it's out of scope for
the two mailing lists you posted to.
mcl
___
Sunday 13 of February 2011 08:12:05 Odhiambo Washington napisał(a):
My question is: WHY need 7 DVDs??? DVDs?? Even M$ does not do such a crazy
thing with its bloat-ware!! FreeBSD ships 1 DVD.
What is it that this Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ships in those 7 DVDs?
I think the answer for your first
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12:05AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
My question is: WHY need 7 DVDs??? DVDs?? Even M$ does not do such a crazy
thing with its bloat-ware!! FreeBSD ships 1 DVD.
What is it that this Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ships in those 7 DVDs?
It's probably just that portion of
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports
Hi,
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
So, what's the difference between e.g. LATEST_LINK= and
LATEST_LINK?=?
Thanks, Helmut
On 13 February 2011 14:14, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
So, what's the
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:14:17 + (UTC)
Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
So,
Chris Rees wrote:
On 13 February 2011 14:14, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:14:17 + (UTC)
Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
So, what's
Is it up to the maintainer to decide which variables shall be
overwritable, or are there rules?
Generally one wants to respect as much of the user's wishes as they
can. So things like CC, CFLAGS, CPP, CXX, etc should have a question
mark.
MAINTAINER and other internal port variable are
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com writes:
On 13 February 2011 14:14, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
On 13 February 2011 13:00, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid
is there any point in trying to update linux-f10-pango to address this
vulnerability?
Affected package: linux-f10-pango-1.22.3_1
Type of problem: pango -- integer overflow.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/4b172278-3f46-11de-becb-001cc0377035.html
I realize that I can install it w/
Am 13.02.2011 22:53, schrieb Tom Uffner:
is there any point in trying to update linux-f10-pango to address this
vulnerability?
Affected package: linux-f10-pango-1.22.3_1
Type of problem: pango -- integer overflow.
Reference:
14 matches
Mail list logo