Sorry for the late reply, everyone - I was distracted with some other things
for a while.
PATCHING:
I'll probably have to look through the syntax of OPTIONS in the Makefiles
of other KDE / CMAKE ports to get a handle on how to implement.
Bapt you can have it installed on your system but not
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:03:09AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, everyone - I was distracted with some other things
for a while.
PATCHING:
I'll probably have to look through the syntax of OPTIONS in the Makefiles
of other KDE / CMAKE ports to get a handle on how to
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports
Hi,
Could you please review attached patches? They're adding
ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE handling.
--
Thanks,
Yahor
acpi_call.txz
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there?
On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor Shybeka egor.shib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Could you please review attached patches? They're adding
ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE handling.
--
Thanks,
Yahor
--
Best regards,
Maxim
OK.
Thanks,
Yahor
On 27.03.2013 07:10, Maxim Ignatenko wrote:
Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there?
On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor Shybeka egor.shib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Could you please review attached patches? They're adding
ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE
I know grub2 is not very popular with the FreeBSD community, but I like it.
Currently the grub2 port looks broken and port maintainer has advised me
that he plans on dropping the port soon. I don't see any point in filing a
PR at this point...
This leaves git/svn trunk from the grub2 download
Hi,
I have been trying to install* FREEBSD PORTS* on my machine. I have
download the installable from this site http://www.freebsd.org
As the per the instruction mentioned on your site .
http://www.freebsd.orghttp://netmagis.org/install-2.1.html, I tired
to installation but was not able to. It is
Here it is https://github.com/gelraen/acpi_call
On 27 March 2013 15:15, Yahor Shybeka egor.shib...@gmail.com wrote:
OK.
Thanks,
Yahor
On 27.03.2013 07:10, Maxim Ignatenko wrote:
Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there?
On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor
It's nice to see something like redports. It can be helpful to those using
ports to diagnose their local builds against the output of a formal
sandbox
service for the project. It would be cool if the logs, build hiers and
packages
from such a buildbot were accessible. They'd obviously always
Hello,
You don't need libzfs to use grub2 on ZFS. You just need to specify the
zfs module if your 'grub-install' target is a ZFS dataset. I've submitted
a patch for this port a while ago, There are probably issues I'm not
aware of but I've been using this custom port for the last 6 months
without
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger
mezz.free...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy
Hi, very happy to see that there are other grub fans in FreeBSD-land!
I was planning to place my grub on a separate UFS partition so that I can
boot other things (like loopbacked iso's) if I should want to. The grub UFS
partition only has grub files in it (what mounts under /boot/grub) and no
EDIT: I just tried make (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and
got different error:
grub-2.00 # make
Makefile, line 20946: Need an operator
line 20946 is:
44: export LC_COLLATE := C
45: export LC_CTYPE := C
46: unexport LC_ALL
Which source are you using?
--
View this message in
Trying gmake (thanks for the suggestion to SW)
grub-2.00 # gmake
flex -o grub_script.yy.c --header-file=grub_script.yy.h
./grub-core/script/yylex.l
flex: can't open grub_script.yy.c
gmake: *** [grub_script.yy.h] Error 1
--
View this message in context:
Beeblebrox a écrit :
Hi, very happy to see that there are other grub fans in FreeBSD-land!
I was planning to place my grub on a separate UFS partition so that I can
boot other things (like loopbacked iso's) if I should want to. The grub UFS
partition only has grub files in it (what mounts
Beeblebrox a écrit :
EDIT: I just tried make (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and
got different error:
grub-2.00 # make
Makefile, line 20946: Need an operator
line 20946 is:
44: export LC_COLLATE := C
45: export LC_CTYPE := C
46: unexport LC_ALL
Which source are you
current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need
That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's
why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub
1.98_1 breaks at:
gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu -nostdinc -isystem
current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need
That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's
why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub
1.98_1 breaks at:
gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu -nostdinc -isystem
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:37 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's nice to see something like redports. It can be helpful to those using
ports to diagnose their local builds against the output of a formal
sandbox
service for the project. It would be cool if the logs, build hiers and
Christian:
It seems I did not understand your first post very well:
You are saying that I can also try your tarball, but I thought it was only a
patch to the grub repository. So I'll go ahead and give your
sourcecode+pathc tarball a try and see if it compiles.
Your first post is missing the link
Beeblebrox a écrit :
current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need
That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's
why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub
1.98_1 breaks at:
gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu
Your Makefile went pretty well for a while - config ran cleanly without any
problems.
You're compiling with gcc and use gcc46 include files?
I have lang/gcc46 installed, but found that many gnu-related ports gave gcc
errors. Then I found the fix like this (until gcc port is modified to
correct
Beeblebrox a écrit :
Your Makefile went pretty well for a while - config ran cleanly without any
problems.
You're compiling with gcc and use gcc46 include files?
I have lang/gcc46 installed, but found that many gnu-related ports gave gcc
errors. Then I found the fix like this (until gcc
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote:
EDIT: I just tried make (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and
got different error:
grub-2.00 # make
Makefile, line 20946: Need an operator
line 20946 is:
44: export LC_COLLATE := C
45: export LC_CTYPE := C
46:
Upgrade to 3.0.6.
-
Build ID: 20130319203600-3903
Job owner: thie...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 days
Enddate: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:35:27 GMT
Revision: r314688
Repository:
Hi there. Just thought I would let you guys know that php5-ice doesn't install
as v3.4 isn't compatible PHP 5.14.x. Below is the error output of attempted
install from ports:
=== php5-Ice-3.4.2 cannot be installed: doesn't work with lang/php5 port
(doesn't support PHP 5.4).
*** [install]
28 matches
Mail list logo
