OTOH I do not want to use ghostscript !
In my view ghost is a critically important port.
I will not be able to use FreeBSD productively withouth it.
Since I have no time or skill to contribute to
address the slowness problem, I'm happy to put
up with the extra hour.
Anton
From m...@freebsd.org Thu Aug 20 09:33:38 2015
+--On 20 ao=C3=BBt 2015 08:24:25 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht =
me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
| OTOH I do not want to use ghostscript !
|=20
| In my view ghost is a critically important port.
| I will not be able to use FreeBSD productively withouth it.
|
On 2015-08-20 09:32, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 20 août 2015 08:24:25 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
| OTOH I do not want to use ghostscript !
|
| In my view ghost is a critically important port.
| I will not be able to use FreeBSD productively withouth it.
| Since I
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:29:00 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:40:27 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
Anybody else is seeing this?
I'm not.
[tiger@laptop]:/2net-im/skype4pkg info -x skype
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Hi,
I would like your comments about removal of ghostscript*-nox11 ports,
more specifically, whether many people think X11 library dependency
is annoying or not. After trying to fix -nox11 ports in the end of
last month and then investigating them more carefully, I also reached
a conclusion
Hi everyone,
portmaster is way too verbose for my tastes. It takes a quarter of the screen
to not update anything, and I get about 2 ports total before any relevant
information about the first one is off the screen. A huge chunk of the messages
are informational verbosity that holds low
I haven't used -nox11 for years.
Plan A for me, but I don't have
a strong opinion.
Thank you for looking into this.
Anton
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port just
works fine, it does take a few seconds for make to iterate over all
options, but it's because the port has way too many options. It's not as
if you're all sitting behind your desk
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
[...]
It's not as
if you're all sitting behind your desk looking at the screen waiting for it
to finish.
I can not wait for this:
ls -al /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9
total 88
drwxr-xr-x3 root wheel512 Aug 20 12:15 .
drwxr-xr-x 262 root
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Plan A: Just remove print/ghostscript*-nox11.
Currently ghostscript depends on X11 libraries of ice, sm, x11,
xext, and xt. While one can still eliminate these dependency by
disabling X11 in PORT_OPTIONS, the pre-complied packages always
depend on
On 2015-Aug-20 10:08:37 -0500, Matthew D. Fuller fulle...@over-yonder.net
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:32:07AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port
just works fine, it does take a few seconds
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Henk van Oers wrote:
[root@mbox /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9]# time date
Thu Aug 20 13:49:43 CEST 2015
real0m0.003s
user0m0.003s
sys 0m0.001s
[root@mbox /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9]# time make clean
[...]
[root@mbox /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9]#
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:07:55 -0400 Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Ports Index build indexbu...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Ports Index build indexbu...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
PKGNAME, e.g. by using PKGNAMESUFFIX. Note that
+--On 20 août 2015 08:24:25 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
| OTOH I do not want to use ghostscript !
|
| In my view ghost is a critically important port.
| I will not be able to use FreeBSD productively withouth it.
| Since I have no time or skill to contribute to
| address
16 matches
Mail list logo
