On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega
alv...@octality.com wrote:
Hello Diego,
On 12/03/2010, at 00:48, Diego Schulz wrote:
My main reason for updating from 0.99.38 to 0.99.43 was an extrange
behavior: cherokee daemon doesn't respond to TERM signals sent with
kill(1
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Michiel van Es m...@pcintelligence.nl wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if it is a problem but I also found out that the install does
not create a cherokee user on freebsd and that cherokee is running as root
default on freebsd...
Yes, I noticed that too. I also
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michiel van Es m...@pcintelligence.nl wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee Web Server version in ports tree
From: Diego Schulz dsch...@gmail.com
To: Michiel van Es m...@pcintelligence.nl
Date: 03/12/2010 02:33 PM
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Diego Schulz dsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I help maintaining Cherokee port? The current available version
Welcome to maintain this unmaintained port.
I will take it.
wen
(0.99.38) has
Can I help maintaining Cherokee port? The current available version
(0.99.38) has various bugs fixed in the latest upstream version.
Here's the distinfo diff:
1,3c1,3
MD5 (cherokee-0.99.38.tar.gz) = 67be28eda0673598fbb5b1cbd70de455
SHA256 (cherokee-0.99.38.tar.gz) =
