Re: Update to Ubuntu One client port

2011-08-16 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru To: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Update to Ubuntu One client port Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:12:29 +0400 Jesse Smith wrote on 13.08.2011 04:44: Here is my third

Update to Ubuntu One client port

2011-08-12 Thread Jesse Smith
Here is my third attempt at a port for the Ubuntu One client. I know it's not pretty yet. I appreciate the feedback and I'll try to clean it up once the port builds installs properly. Has anyone had any luck getting this port to install and run, besides me? Thanks everyone, Jesse # This is a

Re: Ubuntu One port -- update

2011-08-11 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: Koop Mast k...@rainbow-runner.nl To: gni...@gmail.com Cc: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ubuntu One port Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:08:29 +0200 On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 00:02 +0300, Anton wrote: On 11.08.2011 01:53, Jesse

Ubuntu One port

2011-08-10 Thread Jesse Smith
Hi all, I've been working on a port of the Ubuntu One client. Ubuntu One is a cloud storage service and the client is used to sync files with the remote server. The port has been progressing well and I've reached a point where it builds and installs cleanly on my machine. However, running the

Sogo

2010-09-09 Thread Jesse Smith
Hi Johan, In regards to Sogo, I'll take a look at it and see if I can make a port for FreeBSD. Depending on how the application is set up, this can take a while to smooth out the differences between building on Linux and building on FreeBSD. Regards, Jesse

Re: Converting from jiffies to ticks

2010-08-20 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com To: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Converting from jiffies to ticks Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:26:45 -0700 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:15:39PM -0300, Jesse Smith

Converting from jiffies to ticks

2010-08-19 Thread Jesse Smith
I am currently trying to port a program from Linux to FreeBSD which detects how much processor time a process is using. The native Linux code does this (in part) by reading the number of jiffies a given process uses. This info is pulled from the /proc/PID/stat file. One function is failing on

Question about gmcs/mono

2010-08-11 Thread Jesse Smith
Hi all, I'm trying to put together a port and I'm running into a dependency issue. The package's configure script says it can't find gmcs on the system. A little Googling has told me that gmcs is a part of Mono. But I'm not sure which Mono module I need. There are a lot of Mono packages in the

Re: Question about gmcs/mono

2010-08-11 Thread Jesse Smith
Forwarded Message From: Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org Reply-to: glar...@freebsd.org To: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question about gmcs/mono Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:58:36 -0400 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Port stuck in the pipe

2010-08-06 Thread Jesse Smith
About two months ago I submitted a PR for a new port (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147768) From the tracking page it looks like it got bounced around a little and then didn't go anywhere. It's a game, so I understand it being a low priority, but I'm wondering if there is anything I

Re: usage of shar command

2010-07-23 Thread Jesse Smith
I would like to see a little clarification on the handling of shar in the handbook. Not a lot, but maybe a few examples. Most of the pages on porting up to that point I found pretty clear, but that part I found a little vague. There's a line which says something like attach the shar output to

Re: Broken Port math/emc2

2010-07-15 Thread Jesse Smith
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca wrote: This morning I tried to build and install a port, math/emc2 and received an error message saying there was a size mismatch. As I understand it, this means the upstream source package is now a different size than

Broken Port math/emc2

2010-07-14 Thread Jesse Smith
This morning I tried to build and install a port, math/emc2 and received an error message saying there was a size mismatch. As I understand it, this means the upstream source package is now a different size than it was when the emc2 port was created. If I understand correctly, this usually happens

Re: PR Load Solutions

2010-07-12 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org Reply-to: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 373, Issue 1 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:00:25 + (UTC) On a related note, what about trying to actively attract upstream

Re: PR Load Solutions

2010-07-11 Thread Jesse Smith
Original Message- From: Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com To: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR Load Solutions Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:55:32 -0500 On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 06:46:36AM -0700, Jesse Smith wrote: I would be happy to take over

Re: Virtualbox consuming wcpu

2010-07-07 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org Reply-to: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 372, Issue 3 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 06:30:02 + (UTC) I recently upgraded to the new port version of virtualbox - 3.2.6. After

Re: Who to bug to commit some ports?

2010-06-22 Thread Jesse Smith
I recently submitted some PRs for updates and new ports and would like to know whom to ask for them to be committed. Yes, I know, I can try to bug some ports committers using e-mail 8-), but if possible, I would like to avoid this 8-) It's approx. 8 days later, and the ports are still not

Data files and ports

2010-06-11 Thread Jesse Smith
I'm trying to teach myself how to build a FreeBSD port and, with a lot of help from the manual, it's going well. I have a question though concerning policy/style. I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two separate packages from the upstream project. One package contains the

Re: Data files and ports

2010-06-11 Thread Jesse Smith
-Original Message- From: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net To: Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org Cc: Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca, freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Data files and ports Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:41:45 +0300 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:17:46AM -0400

Port request

2010-05-26 Thread Jesse Smith
I was told that requests for new ports should be submitted here. There's one tool which I would like to see brought into the Ports system and that's Network Manager (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/NetworkManager) It's the only networking tool I've found so far which will properly handle my

Port Request

2010-05-26 Thread Jesse Smith
I was told that requests for new ports should be submitted here. There's one tool which I would like to see brought into the Ports system and that's Network Manager (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/NetworkManager) It's the only networking tool I've found so far which will properly handle my

Re: Port request

2010-05-26 Thread Jesse Smith
On 2010-May-26 09:19:04 -0300, Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca wrote: I was told that requests for new ports should be submitted here. Unfortunately, you were misled. FreeBSD ports are a volunteer effort and the general approach is that if you want a port and no-one has already created

Re: ports/146920: Allegro runtime and Allegro-devel libraries incompatible

2010-05-25 Thread Jesse Smith
Naram, Thank you for your quick reply. I think that clears things up for me. The issue I had run into was my code was written to work with Allegro 4.2 and I found 4.3 was missing a function I was using. However, following your advice, I've made some changes and my package is compiling again.

FreeBSD Port: bftpd-2.7

2010-05-25 Thread Jesse Smith
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that a bug-fix release for Bftpd is available upstream at http://bftpd.sourceforge.net/news.html#032170 Bftpd-2.8 fixes some problems with anonymous logins, has some security improvements and gives more flexibility in regards to listing files on the server. Best