Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-28 Thread Patrick Powell
On 10/26/16 03:56, David Demelier wrote: On 10/26/2016 09:32 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious problem so far. Or then I missed something. Approx. 20 years ago

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-26 Thread David Demelier
On 10/26/2016 09:32 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious problem so far. Or then I missed something. Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-26 Thread Bob Eager
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is > > no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious > > problem so far. Or then I missed something. > > Approx. 20 years

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-26 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is > no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious > problem so far. Or then I missed something. Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-26 Thread David Demelier
2016-10-25 22:57 GMT+02:00 Dave Horsfall : > Have you seen the FreeBSD home page? Well, I thought the OP was talking about the logo [0], not the home web page. Anyway, I think comparing religious and offensive content a bit offtopic. I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-25 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, David Demelier wrote: > I'm a bit surprised to see so much traffic about the jive removal. I'm not :-) > I personally don't care about offensive software, users are free to not > use it (sudo may have funny insults, disabled by default though). > Perhaps marking it broken

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-25 Thread Vitaly Magerya
> can anyone in > this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed I'd like to extend the question: is there a new policy about "offensive" ports not being allowed in the ports tree any longer? If so, could someone point me to it? If not, then, well, I don't know what to

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-25 Thread David Demelier
2016-10-24 20:21 GMT+02:00 Dave Hayes : > On 10/23/2016 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> >> In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} > > > Speaking of maturity and attempting to add consistency, can anyone in this > thread explain why misc/jive is considered

Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-24 Thread Dave Hayes
On 10/23/2016 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} Speaking of maturity and attempting to add consistency, can anyone in this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed, but the FreeBSD daemon logo (on the main web page)