Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Pav Lucistnik
This looks quite impressive. Please commit it. Dmitry Marakasov píše v st 02. 09. 2009 v 07:14 +0400: Hi! Second (smaller) part ready. This eliminates SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED as it is not really needed, also translates all SFE ports to new SF scheme. Patch:

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Alex Dupre
Dmitry Marakasov ha scritto: Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. The script doesn't take into account that the word saved is localized ;-)

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:55:49 +0200 Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote: Dmitry Marakasov ha scritto: Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) and/or to mail me so I improve

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: heanet seems to be the only one that reach 1MB/s from all the tested locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one more result from USA. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: heanet seems to be the only one that reach 1MB/s from all the tested locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one more result from

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread dikshie
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote: Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. Expect the script to download

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread dikshie
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote: Also, you can use this script: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sf-speed.sh to find the fastest mirrors for you (to override MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE) and/or to mail me so I improve sorting. Expect the script to download

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread parv
in message 20090902120700.gd1...@hades.panopticon, wrote Dmitry Marakasov thusly... * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: heanet seems to be the only one that reach 1MB/s from all the tested locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: Thanks a lot for replies! The patch is now committed. Really, the more results I got the more compicated it was to choose the best mirror order so I did stick with fastest mirrors for Europe and US, as other countries like Japan and Indonesia just give

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 04:05:08 -0500 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. dfn, garr: and ovh fail. It might be way too much work for very little benefit,

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com) wrote: In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. dfn, garr: and ovh fail. It might be way too much work for very little benefit, but network latencies being what they

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Wesley Shields
(Trimming CC line...) On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:26:33PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com) wrote: In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. dfn, garr: and ovh fail.

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Wesley Shields (w...@freebsd.org) wrote: There is ports-mgmt/fastest_sites which sorts based upon round-trip time for the TCP handshake to complete. It's not accurate for download speeds but it provides a rough approximation for minimal effort. Thought there was something like that, but

Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-02 Thread CmdLnKid
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:07 -, amdmi3 wrote: * Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: heanet seems to be the only one that reach 1MB/s from all the tested locations, maybe it could be the first in the SF list. Agreed. Also, I'd like at least one more result from USA. Here is two:

Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-01 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi! Second (smaller) part ready. This eliminates SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED as it is not really needed, also translates all SFE ports to new SF scheme. Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sourceforge-extended.patch Here's a little stats on SF mirrors (mirrors were taken from sourceforge mirror