On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Or, maybe automate this, as now port system warns user about possible
network servers -- check all installed binaries and libraries for
linkage with non-system-gcc libraries and add run dependency. But
I'm not sure it is easy to do, as it should be
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 13 сентября 2011 г., 0:05:27:
On 09/12/2011 12:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
How could I determine which ports are directly lined with libgcc from
gcc44? ldd?
Yes, that's really the only answer. I have the following function which
would work:
snip
libchk port could
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 13 сентября 2011 г., 11:01:14:
For example, x264 DEPENDS on gcc, (has USE_GCC=4.4+ in Makefile),
but no x264 files are linked with libgcc_s.so or other libraries from
gcc44. It seems, that we need separate USE_GCC_BUILD and USE_GCC_RUN,
as with PERL or PYTHON.
Or,
For example, x264 DEPENDS on gcc, (has USE_GCC=4.4+ in Makefile),
but no x264 files are linked with libgcc_s.so or other libraries from
gcc44. It seems, that we need separate USE_GCC_BUILD and USE_GCC_RUN,
as with PERL or PYTHON.
Or, maybe automate this, as now port system warns
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
Maybe this script is helpful:
http://www.secnetix.de/olli/scripts/pkg_dep_view
By default it displays the dependency graph of your
on 13/09/2011 10:01 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
libchk port could help, too. But it seems top be broken. It shows,
that system /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 depends on gcc44's libgcc_s.so
and it is completely wrong!
I'll fill pr about it!
Most likely there is something wrong in your
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 13 сентября 2011 г., 17:10:13:
I'll fill pr about it!
Most likely there is something wrong in your environment.
libmap.conf or some such.
it is empty.
libchk uses what ldd(1) reports and ldd reports what would happen during
actual
run-time linking.
ldd run
Hello, Ports.
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my
system :)
--
// Black Lion AKA
On 12/09/2011 17:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ports.
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
I need to investigate exact path why this port is
Hello, Eric.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 21:33:58:
Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports
website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which
what I think you want.
Oh. For gcc45, for example, list is soobig, that command line tool,
Hello, Matthew.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 22:38:05:
On 12/09/2011 17:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ports.
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list,
On 09/12/2011 12:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Eric.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 21:33:58:
Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports
website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which
what I think you want.
Oh. For gcc45, for
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 23:43:03:
It's not as easy to represent the data in the way you describe as you
might think. Something like gcc is going to have multiple entry points
in a graph, which is really hard to represent in a (sort of)
1-dimensional structure like a tree.
On 09/12/2011 12:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
How could I determine which ports are directly lined with libgcc from
gcc44? ldd?
Yes, that's really the only answer. I have the following function which
would work:
old_libs ()
{
local file nf;
[ -e ~/old-lib-list ] unlink ~/old-lib-list;
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my
system :)
Neither
Quoth Helmut Schneider on Monday, 12 September 2011:
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from required port to users? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
I need to investigate
16 matches
Mail list logo
