OK, guys,
As I see everybody agrees on splitting boost into several ports and on
Boost.Python beeing a separate port. Let's proceed with option #2
(jam, libs, python-libs and docs).
Personally, I like the idea #4 of having source-libs and a port per a
shared library. I'd like to have another
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
As I see everybody agrees on splitting boost into several ports and on
Boost.Python beeing a separate port. Let's proceed with option #2
(jam, libs, python-libs and docs).
Personally, I like the idea #4 of having source-libs and a
Dmitry,
We'll need an exp-run for it anyway, so I guess it's OK.
If you have a patch ready, I suggest to file a PR and mail pav@ to do
exp-run for it. If there are no major failures, we can push it into the
tree, else we won't be bored during the freeze fixing it.
As I understand this, it's
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
We'll need an exp-run for it anyway, so I guess it's OK.
If you have a patch ready, I suggest to file a PR and mail pav@ to do
exp-run for it. If there are no major failures, we can push it into the
tree, else we won't be bored
Dmitry Marakasov píše v út 07. 04. 2009 v 20:13 +0400:
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
We'll need an exp-run for it anyway, so I guess it's OK.
If you have a patch ready, I suggest to file a PR and mail pav@ to do
exp-run for it. If there are no major
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:50:11 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru
wrote:
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
There are 95 libraries in boost.
Woo, that's sure too many.
Let me explain that:
Boost has source-only libraries and separately-compiled libraries.
2009/4/3 Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru:
Not sure if splitting it into many small libraries is a good idea. How
many are there, btw? Is it a port per libboost_*so, or per
include/boost/* ?
Neither. Per the list of libraries: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0
There are 95 libraries in
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
There are 95 libraries in boost.
Woo, that's sure too many.
Let me explain that:
Boost has source-only libraries and separately-compiled libraries.
Source-only libraries consist of header files only and do not require
any
2009/4/1 Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru:
* Jeremy Messenger (me...@cox.net) wrote:
No need bsd.boost.mk over that small stuff. How about resolve conflict for
real by split boost and boost-python by have boost only install non-python
stuff and boost-python install only python stuff?
That
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
I've already did it about a month ago. Currently I'm testing the
solution. There are two ideas about splitting boost:
Woo, this is great!
1) Split it into bjam, source-libs, shared-libs, python-libs and docs.
This is what was
* Jeremy Messenger (me...@cox.net) wrote:
No need bsd.boost.mk over that small stuff. How about resolve conflict for
real by split boost and boost-python by have boost only install non-python
stuff and boost-python install only python stuff?
That of course would be harder and more
Hi!
By the way, I've just ran into this sample of code in www/openvrml:
.if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/boost/python.hpp)
LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_python.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost-python
.else
LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_regex.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost
.endif
and thought: why don't we create something
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:02:46 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru
wrote:
Hi!
By the way, I've just ran into this sample of code in www/openvrml:
.if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/boost/python.hpp)
LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_python.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost-python
.else
LIB_DEPENDS+=
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:29:19 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru
wrote:
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
As stated on http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject, all issues
with ports depending on devel/boost are resolved.
Thank guys for work on boost stuff.
14 matches
Mail list logo
