On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Josh Rickmar wrote:
I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual
discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the proper
list.
I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but
Hi,
I cannot install this version of setiathome. The setup script _autosetup
fails for make, m4 and pkg-config.
I took a peek in the file, and the way it checks for version seems to be at
fault. It runs each command with the flag --version
which is not a correct flag for neither make or m4. The
Hi,
FWIW, this version of the setiathome port installed fine here. A few
things you can check:
- non-standard flags in /etc/make.conf
- unusual settings in environment
- use of a non-standard shell (for the user who is doing the install)
HTH
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
I got some feedback (in private mail), so I have updated my patch,
because the port was leaving traces behind.
I hope this is better.
See attachment.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
=== Generating patch
=== Viewing diff with more
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait../usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 784:
Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== editors/xemacs failed
*** Error code 1
1 error
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait../usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line
784: Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:42:48 -0600, Jeremy Messenger me...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait../usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line
784:
Lowell Gilbert píše v so 10. 01. 2009 v 11:54 -0500:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait../usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 784:
Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== editors/xemacs failed
***
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management fuckup? I mean this:
http://np237.livejournal.com/22014.html
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson o...@nixil.net wrote:
I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the
issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this patch:
--- Makefile.orig
Garrett Cooper wrote:
I just started using portmaster this past week, and it appears to go a
bit crazy removing dependencies -- there were a lot of libraries
broken after removing dependencies that shouldn't have been. This
could all be because of bad dependencies in the Makefiles though.
Michal Varga wrote:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management ...
FYI we don't use that kind of language on our lists.
In any case it seems something
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:39:50 -0600, Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management fuckup? I mean this:
Because
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Michal Varga wrote:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management ...
FYI we don't
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt datahe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson o...@nixil.net wrote:
I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the
issue was with hspell. I
2009/1/10 Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Are you also willing to fix all the applications that will not work with
the new version of boost?
I understand that's the only concern preventing new boost from being
committed.
Why not fix it in several steps? :
1) rename devel/boost to
On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt datahe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson o...@nixil.net wrote:
I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
kdebase-runtime, or
Alexander Churanov píše v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 01:07 +0300:
2009/1/10 Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Are you also willing to fix all the applications that will not
work with
the new version of boost?
I understand that's the only concern
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner dorian.buett...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt datahe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson o...@nixil.net wrote:
I did run into a
On Sunday 11 January 2009 00:00:03 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner dorian.buett...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt datahe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33
On 2009-Jan-10 07:22:21 -0800, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started using portmaster this past week, and it appears to go a
bit crazy removing dependencies -- there were a lot of libraries
broken after removing dependencies that shouldn't have been. This
could all be because of
21 matches
Mail list logo
