Re: ports/*/jpeg Thanks a lot guys

2009-08-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
Doug Barton wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Gentoo Linux (I know -- Gentoo + Linux -- we're FreeBSD... blah :P) has a script called `revdep-rebuild' which goes and runs ldd on all pieces of software that are installed in portage (ok, substitute ports here). What I'm driving at is that we can use

Re: x11-toolkits/xview requires COMPAT_43TTY defined to build on -CURRENT

2009-08-04 Thread Tom Uffner
Mel Flynn wrote: So, the real fix should come from upstream. For the time being, this should work, marked MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE while I was in there. The OSVERSION leaves a three week hole where things won't work, but that should be acceptable. Thank you for the patch. I'm guessing an upstream fix

Re: ports/*/jpeg Thanks a lot guys

2009-08-04 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 02 August 2009 06:52:03 Matthew Seaman wrote: Similarly, programs that declare 'USE_MYSQL=NN' will have a LIB_DEPENDS on libmysqlclient.so.X added to their dependency mix even if they contain no compiled ELF binaries [See net-mgmt/cacti databases/phpmyadmin] That's because you use

Re: freebsd-update userland sources

2009-08-04 Thread perryh
Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sunday 02 August 2009 16:10:37 Tom Mende wrote: Is there a way to get freebsd-update to keep userland sources up to date? Yes. If you have source code installed (for the right version of FreeBSD) in /usr/src, then freebsd-update will keep it

Re: recent update causes perl5.10 build failure

2009-08-04 Thread Scott Bennett
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:24:10 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: Scott Bennett wrote: An update yesterday or today results in perl5.10's build aborting. When it failed under portmaster, the messages from several processes were too jumbled for me to see easily what had

Re: [kde-freebsd] devel/boost: new patch for testing update to 1.39

2009-08-04 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:53:55PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote: On Friday 31 July 2009 04:29:06 Alexander Churanov wrote: Now It's clear. Thank you for explanation. The WITH_PYSTE was not in the options framework, that's why I've missed this part

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
FYI, In the future you're likely to get faster results if you send your problem report to the port's maintainer as well as the freebsd-ports@ list. Thanks Doug see below for replies David Southwell wrote: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jun 24 00:14:35 UTC 2009 r...@amd64-

Re: java broken on recent -current?

2009-08-04 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Mel Flynn (mel.flynn+fbsd.po...@mailing.thruhere.net) wrote: Thou shall search the archives before posting. The short and curlies: Indeed. Thanks! -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ru

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Diego Depaoli
2009/8/1 Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com: On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote: I now know more than ever why I switched to OpenBSD. FreeBSD people no longer seem to care about broken ports, or making people who submit broken patches maintainers, or even replying

Re: Python extensions problem on compiling www/epiphany (related??) devel/boost-python-libs

2009-08-04 Thread Alexander Churanov
David, This really looks like you have a broken python installation. Sincerely, Alexander Churanov ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: apr-gdbm-db42 upgrade conflicting with libtool

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
It seems this may be related to AMD64 kernel? Still getting the following error while trying to compile. checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes checking for library containing strerror... none required checking whether system uses EBCDIC... no performing libtool

Re: apr-gdbm-db42 upgrade conflicting with libtool

2009-08-04 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
David Southwell wrote: may be I have a clue but am not certain which step was responsible for finally getting apr to compile so I am going through what I did in the hope it may help I cannot guarantee I have remembered everything because it was spread over many hours whilst doing many other

Re: FreeBSD Port: dovecot-1.2.x

2009-08-04 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:47:18PM -0400, Yarema wrote: Frank Leonhardt wrote: Hi, I'm trying to track down a very weird issue with Dovecot and MS Outlook 2003, and it'd be good to be using 1.2.x in the tests. Any idea when it might be coming? If it's going to be a while I might have a

is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

2009-08-04 Thread Scott Bennett
I see that /usr/ports/UPDATING describes an upgrade of devel/libtool15 and devel/libtldl15 to devel/libtool22 and devel/libtldl22, respectively. Is this a good enough thing to do to justify the probable misery and risk of disaster that would be necessary to get through it? If so, I'll give

pth.h errors while compiling portupgrade -rf python26-2.6.2_1

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell ARPS
problems with pth.h In file included from extensions/pyexpat.c:5: /usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h:168:17: error: pth.h: No such file or directory error: command 'cc' failed with exit status 1 *** Error code 1 sr/local/include -IModules/_sqlite -I/usr/local/include/python2.6 -c

Re: pth.h errors while compiling portupgrade -rf python26-2.6.2_1 -RESOLVED

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
problems with pth.h In file included from extensions/pyexpat.c:5: /usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h:168:17: error: pth.h: No such file or directory error: command 'cc' failed with exit status 1 *** Error code 1 sr/local/include -IModules/_sqlite -I/usr/local/include/python2.6 -c

Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

2009-08-04 Thread Olivier Smedts
2009/8/4 Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu:     I see that /usr/ports/UPDATING describes an upgrade of devel/libtool15 and devel/libtldl15 to devel/libtool22 and devel/libtldl22, respectively. Is this a good enough thing to do to justify the probable misery and risk of disaster that would be

Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

2009-08-04 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Scott Bennett (benn...@cs.niu.edu) wrote: Has anyone done this new upgrade and survived yet? I had no problems. There are not really many ports which depend on libltdl anyway. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber:

compile error www/epiphany ? libtool error???

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
pixman-1.so /usr/local/lib/libglitz.so -lpng /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render- util.so /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so /usr/local/lib/libX11.so /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so /usr/local/lib/libXau.so /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so -lrpcsvc /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lm

Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

2009-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
Scott Bennett wrote: I see that /usr/ports/UPDATING describes an upgrade of devel/libtool15 and devel/libtldl15 to devel/libtool22 and devel/libtldl22, respectively. Is this a good enough thing to do to justify the probable misery and risk of disaster that would be necessary to get

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
Diego Depaoli wrote: There are too many ports and too few people who care them. IMHO the options are: - decrease the number of ports We trim dead/useless ports all the time. - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers... This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. - switch to

Re: compile error www/epiphany ? libtool error ???

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
pixman-1.so /usr/local/lib/libglitz.so -lpng /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render- util.so /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so /usr/local/lib/libX11.so /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so /usr/local/lib/libXau.so /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so -lrpcsvc /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lm

Re: recent update causes perl5.10 build failure

2009-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
Scott Bennett wrote: Keep in mind that this experience did appear to reveal a portmaster bug. After the portmaster -w -v -a had already asked whether to rebuild perl5.8 even though it had a +IGNOREME file and had gotten an enter key in response, which should have selected the n shown as

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

2009-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
David Southwell wrote: I have tried with: WITH_THREADS=true WITH_MOUSE=true WITHOUT_NLS=true WITHOUT_ISPELL=true WITHOUT_NOSPELL=true WITH_PICO=true WITH_IPV6=true WITH_LDAP=true WITHOUT_PASSFILE=true WITH_CONS25=true WITHOUT_QUOTA=true WITH_MAILDIR=true AND WITHOUT_IPV6=true

Re: Getting a lot of - pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring

2009-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
eculp wrote: I rebuilt the packages and all is well. Glad to hear that it worked out for you. :) Thanks again for the explanation, the script and especially for Postmaster that I have been using almost exclusively since the first version and has been improving .with each subsequent release.

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Doug (Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:26:08 -0700) * | - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers... | This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. `---* Take a look at the PR submission and update dates in

Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

2009-08-04 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 06:56:06PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Scott Bennett (benn...@cs.niu.edu) wrote: Has anyone done this new upgrade and survived yet? I had no problems. There are not really many ports which depend on libltdl anyway. I've just done it ('portupgrade -o

Re: devel/boost: new patch for testing update to 1.39

2009-08-04 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:28:02 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: 2009/8/4 Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.po...@mailing.thruhere.net: I think for the time being PySTE support should be off by default, because it pulls in a second libc and databases/akonadi plus kdeedu[34] use boost-python and because

Which JDK port to use?

2009-08-04 Thread Steven Friedrich
I see diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_15 and jdk-1.5.0.16p9_2,1 Which should I use? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: apr-gdbm-db42 upgrade conflicting with libtool

2009-08-04 Thread N.J. Mann
In message 20090803155055.ga31...@titania.njm.me.uk, N.J. Mann (n...@njm.me.uk) wrote: In message 20090803125519.ga60...@twisted.net, Troy (t...@twisted.net) wrote: I was trying to upgrade apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.6.1.3.8 to 1.3.7.1.3.8 and ran into the following error. My libtool

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Diego Depaoli
2009/8/4 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: Diego Depaoli wrote: There are too many ports and too few people who care them. IMHO the options are: - decrease the number of ports We trim dead/useless ports all the time. - increase the number of  volunteers/committers/testers... This is the only

Re: devel/boost: new patch for testing update to 1.39

2009-08-04 Thread Alexander Churanov
2009/8/4 Max Brazhnikov m...@freebsd.org: there is no any port depending on pyste and I doubt there will be one in near future. Pulling gcc3 for newer systems because of hardly potential inconvenience seems to be excessive for me. OK, if there are really no ports depending on it, then I'll

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

2009-08-04 Thread Mel Flynn
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:15:04 David Southwell wrote: latest error messages: cc -std=gnu99 -g -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe - DLDAP_DEPRECATED -rpath=/usr/local/lib -o alpine addrbook.o adrbkcmd.o after.o alpine.o arg.o busy.o colorconf.o confscroll.o context.o dispfilt.o

Re: Which JDK port to use?

2009-08-04 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Steven Friedrich free...@insightbb.comwrote: I see diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_15 and jdk-1.5.0.16p9_2,1 Which should I use? The diablo-* ports are the binary, pre-compiled versions of the JDK, and require a download from the FreeBSD Foundation website. The

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Charlie Kester
On Tue 04 Aug 2009 at 09:21:07 PDT Diego Depaoli wrote: 2009/8/4 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: Diego Depaoli wrote: There are too many ports and too few people who care them. IMHO the options are: - decrease the number of ports We trim dead/useless ports all the time. - increase the number

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: On Tue 04 Aug 2009 at 09:21:07 PDT Diego Depaoli wrote: 2009/8/4 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: Diego Depaoli wrote: There are too many ports and too few people who care them. IMHO the options are: - decrease the number of

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

2009-08-04 Thread David Southwell
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:15:04 David Southwell wrote: latest error messages: cc -std=gnu99 -g -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe - DLDAP_DEPRECATED -rpath=/usr/local/lib -o alpine addrbook.o adrbkcmd.o after.o alpine.o arg.o busy.o colorconf.o confscroll.o context.o

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:55:19AM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote: Wouldn't it be better for everybody if more people could commit the changes in their ports themselves? (Subject to a commit-privilege revocation on a substantial breakage anyplace). IMHO: no. Too many people automatically update

Re: Which JDK port to use?

2009-08-04 Thread Cezary Morga
Steven Friedrich pisze: I see diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_15 and jdk-1.5.0.16p9_2,1 Which should I use? Diablo can't do all the mumbo jumbo JDK can do. So, if you or your developers require more they can get out of Diablo go ahead and try JDK. Still, current JDK--or Diablo--installation is

What does py25 mean?

2009-08-04 Thread Lars Eighner
What does py25 mean? I can't seem to upgrade about 40 ports (the old versions of which now seem to be broken) evidently because the build of py25-gtk-2.13.1 fails with the message py25-cairo-1.8.6 needs Python 2.6 at least. But you specified 2.5. Well, of *I* did not specify 2.5. But

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-08-04 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: qt4-qmake-4.5.2 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: qt4-imageformats-4.5.2 Committers on the hook: miwi wxs Most

Re: kdeedu-4.2.4 to 4.2.4_1 facile.cmxa compile error

2009-08-04 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 02 August 2009 12:39:55 Martin Wilke wrote: On Sunday 02 August 2009 05:06:19 Troy wrote: [ 12%] Generating solver.o File _none_, line 1, characters 0-1: Error: Files /usr/local/lib/ocaml/facile/facile.cmxa and /usr/local/lib/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa make inconsistent assumptions

Thanks for KDE 4.3.0 and Qt 4.5 !

2009-08-04 Thread Olivier Smedts
Big thanks to the FreeBSD KDE team for such a reactive update after the official release ! I've been testing it for few hours, using area51. It works great. Are there any differences between area51 and what have been committed to the ports repository ? The s/MAKE_JOBS_SAVE/MAKE_JOBS_SAFE fix

Re: [kde-freebsd] Thanks for KDE 4.3.0 and Qt 4.5 !

2009-08-04 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:44:53PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: Big thanks to the FreeBSD KDE team for such a reactive update after the official release ! I've been testing it for few hours, using area51. It works great. Are there any

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-08-04 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: kdepim-4.3.0: no entry for /usr/ports/deskutils/kdepim4-runtime make_index: kdepim-4.3.0: no entry for

Re: What does py25 mean?

2009-08-04 Thread matt donovan
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Lars Eighner portsu...@larseighner.comwrote: What does py25 mean? I can't seem to upgrade about 40 ports (the old versions of which now seem to be broken) evidently because the build of py25-gtk-2.13.1 fails with the message py25-cairo-1.8.6 needs Python

Re: What does py25 mean?

2009-08-04 Thread Mel Flynn
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:28:59 matt donovan wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Lars Eighner portsu...@larseighner.comwrote: What does py25 mean? I can't seem to upgrade about 40 ports (the old versions of which now seem to be broken) evidently because the build of

Re: x11-toolkits/xview requires COMPAT_43TTY defined to build on -CURRENT

2009-08-04 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Tom Uffnert...@uffner.com wrote: Mel Flynn wrote: So, the real fix should come from upstream. For the time being, this should work, marked MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE while I was in there. The OSVERSION leaves a three week hole where things won't work, but that should be

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2009-08-04 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org