On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:00:35 +0800
wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:51:47PM +0100, Francisco de Borja López Río
wrote:
I've tried to contact the maintainer of the openerp-server
Sorry, I forgot to add the attachments in my previous email.
These are both the rc.d script and the default configuration file I've
been using with the current openerp-server port for some time.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:36:49 +0100
Francisco de Borja López Río bo...@pexego.es wrote:
On Thu, 21
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
x11/gmrun, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparing a heck
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Michal Varga wrote:
# pkg_info | wc -l
457
#
And this machine is even my package-building station!
Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. g
Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those
Hi,
databases/pgadmin3 port was updated to 1.10.1 yesterday evening (20/01).
Since then I've been running portsnap and portversion and while portsnap
says at the moment its database is from Thu Jan 21 08:53:37 CET 2010
portversion says the port is up-to-date:
pgadmin3-1.10.0_1 =
On Thursday 21 January 2010 07:54:36 Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:39:12 +0100
Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
HPS Hi,
HPS
HPS I've made another stability update. See attachment.
HPS
mailman stripped your attachment, can you give link where I can see it?
mato wrote:
Hi,
databases/pgadmin3 port was updated to 1.10.1 yesterday evening (20/01).
Since then I've been running portsnap and portversion and while portsnap
says at the moment its database is from Thu Jan 21 08:53:37 CET 2010
portversion says the port is up-to-date:
pgadmin3-1.10.0_1
Hi,
manpage of portmaster says:
--show-work
show what dependent ports are, and are not installed (implies -t).
It is right behavior of this option, but I think its name is confusing.
I think it should be names something like show-deps or
show-installed-deps instead of show-work.
The name
Sean McAfee wrote:
mato wrote:
Hi,
databases/pgadmin3 port was updated to 1.10.1 yesterday evening (20/01).
Since then I've been running portsnap and portversion and while
portsnap says at the moment its database is from Thu Jan 21 08:53:37
CET 2010 portversion says the port is up-to-date:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
pretty nasty, I'm envious.
Well, afaik I even cannot use more than one CPU when building ports.
There were plans/rumors that this would change. Does anyone
On 1/21/2010 6:08 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
manpage of portmaster says:
--show-work
show what dependent ports are, and are not installed (implies -t).
It is right behavior of this option, but I think its name is confusing.
Yes, I've never liked the name, but I've never been able to
Ok, I'm SO happy my webcam is supported by video4bsd-kmod and webcamd.
Is there a way to start webcamd from rc?
I checked /etc/defaults/rc.conf but webcamd isn't in there...
I'm a SysAdmin, so I know ways to do it, I'm just trying to find out if there
is a mechanism yet...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:34:02 -0800
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 1/20/2010 6:47 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Some may not don't mind
installing binaries from elsewhere, but FreeSBD could protect more,
What is it that you're trying to protect people from? In other words,
what
2010/1/21 Steven Friedrich free...@insightbb.com:
Ok, I'm SO happy my webcam is supported by video4bsd-kmod and webcamd.
Is there a way to start webcamd from rc?
webcamd_enable=YES
You should look at the corresponding script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/
It won't be in /etc/defaults/rc.conf as it's
Hi, one of the programs I'm using (freeradius' rlm_perl) segfaults with
both Perl 5.8.9 and 5.10, only working with 5.8.8. How can I cleanly
install Perl 5.8.8 on a fresh system, without mangling the port
Makefile? I've tried putting both USE_PERL=5.8.8 and PERL_VERSION=5.8.8
in
rihad wrote:
Hi, one of the programs I'm using (freeradius' rlm_perl) segfaults with
both Perl 5.8.9 and 5.10, only working with 5.8.8. How can I cleanly
install Perl 5.8.8 on a fresh system, without mangling the port
Makefile? I've tried putting both USE_PERL=5.8.8 and PERL_VERSION=5.8.8
in
Hi,
Reference:
From: Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de
Reply-to: gary.jennej...@freenet.de
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:01:46 +0100
Message-id: 20100121170146.672ac...@ernst.jennejohn.org
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:34:02 -0800
Doug Barton
Matthew Seaman wrote:
rihad wrote:
Hi, one of the programs I'm using (freeradius' rlm_perl) segfaults
with both Perl 5.8.9 and 5.10, only working with 5.8.8. How can I
cleanly install Perl 5.8.8 on a fresh system, without mangling the
port Makefile? I've tried putting both USE_PERL=5.8.8 and
Nasty error that should probably be addressed via the port.
http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1602
Adding, 'server.network-backend = write' to the default lighttpd.conf seems
to resolve the issue.
Cheers,
Austin Sanderson
Senior Network Administrator
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:11:10PM -0600, Austin Sanderson wrote:
Nasty error that should probably be addressed via the port.
http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1602
Adding, 'server.network-backend = write' to the default lighttpd.conf seems
to resolve the issue.
This should be fixed by
2010/1/21 Francisco de Borja López Río bo...@pexego.es:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:00:35 +0800
wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:51:47PM +0100, Francisco de Borja López Río
wrote:
I've
I'm sorry, you still haven't answered my questions:
1. What dangers are you trying to protect users from?
2. Why do you feel that existing safeguards for what goes into the ports
tree are not adequate?
Responding indirectly to your last post, the ports infrastructure is
already VERY complex.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base
version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the
current
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:58:18 -0500
Steven Friedrich free...@insightbb.com wrote:
SF Ok, I'm SO happy my webcam is supported by video4bsd-kmod and
SF webcamd.
SF
SF Is there a way to start webcamd from rc?
SF
SF I checked /etc/defaults/rc.conf but webcamd isn't in there...
SF
I think
25 matches
Mail list logo
