Hi list,
I would like to know if there is a way to tell a port that it depend
on an other port
but build with particulars options.
Eg : port foo build depend on bar but won't build if bar is not build
with WITH_PARTICULAR.
I don't see anything to say that in bsd.port.mk, so before to
implement
I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
and no idea why it fails to do so.
Fetching
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/147491/jdk6-jaxp-2010_01_15.zip
manually works fine. But if I do that the file will just be
deleted by the build script and it will again try
Charlie Kester wrote:
Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to the
list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3)?
math/ised
misc/xsw
sysutils/rdup
And lang/ikarus too while we're at it.
I don't understand the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/2010 24:18:13, Anonymous wrote:
This doesn't concern only portmaster. As I've mentioned previously
xorg-server, subversion and git don't install any config file (not even
in share/examples) but still look for it inside PREFIX not
Hi,
I am using Gogo MP3 encoder for high speed audio encoding. But my
configuration requires multiple simultaneous streams to be encoded to MP3. I
am planning to use SMP's for the simultaneous behaviour. But looking at the
source code, the changes seem to be huge, extending up to the assembly code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/05/2010 22:57:25, Anonymous wrote:
I can't understand why we should consider PREFIX absence here. Because,
if it is absent then there is *no* port installed, too. The issue
becomes moot: should a non-installed port look for files in
Dominic Fandrey ha scritto:
I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
and no idea why it fails to do so.
Theoretically a port should not download anything in the build stage,
but currently the openjdk6 port does it. I don't know why it fails for
you, but I built the port
Tried to build /usr/ports/www/sarg but it stops building with a ton of error
messages after gcc gets called:
gcc -L/usr/local/lib util.o log.o report.o topuser.o email.o sort.o html.o
totger.o index.o getconf.o usage.o decomp.o ip2name.o useragent.o exclude.o
convlog.o totday.o repday.o
This is an issue very similar to what is described here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145163
The following patch should fix compilation with new png.
--- src/SDL/i_sshot.c.orig 2010-05-19 13:40:36.506099313 +0300
+++ src/SDL/i_sshot.c 2010-05-19 13:41:50.837973800 +0300
@@
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote:
Charlie Kester wrote:
Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following
to the
list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3)?
math/ised
misc/xsw
On Wed, 19 May 2010 02:49:14 +0200
Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch wrote:
MNOn Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:41, Charlie Kester
MNcorky1...@comcast.net wrote:
MN Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the
MN following to the
MN list of GPLv3-licensed ports
MN
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I don't understand the purpose of that list though. What does legal
decisions regarding the use of GPLv3 in our ports system mean?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html :
( BSD License is NOT compatible to GPL v3 ... , please see figure , if I
Adding to this bundle of madness...
I believe that it would be best practice to keep ports/LEGAL up-to-date
with this list.
Those who already have ports on a machine may find it more usefull to
find them there.
Quoting ports/LEGAL:
Some of the ports in this directory have restrictive copyrights
On Wed, 19 May 2010 13:18:52 +0530
Romil Shah romilsha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Gogo MP3 encoder for high speed audio encoding. But my
configuration requires multiple simultaneous streams to be encoded to
MP3. I am planning to use SMP's for the simultaneous behaviour. But
looking
To cut all these discussions short:
George,
I'll ask you as the first author of said page,
- what was the concern or motivation that led to the creation of this page?
- How are FreeBSD ports special if they use GPLv3?
- Why does FreeBSD need to track GPLv3 ports at all?
Thanks.
Matthias
On 19/05/2010 10:25, Alex Dupre wrote:
Dominic Fandrey ha scritto:
I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
and no idea why it fails to do so.
Theoretically a port should not download anything in the build stage,
but currently the openjdk6 port does it. I don't know
No, 3-clause BSD license is compatible with GPLv3 [1] (you can follow
multiple arrows on that figure). You can combine BSD-licensed code with
GPLv3-licensed code and either use it privately or redistribute it under
GPLv3. Pretty much the same as with GPLv2.
Surely.
This actually
Hi
Since the xorg update my xfce4 desktop has become unusable. I always
get the error message below. I even setup FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE from
scratch, updated to 8.0-STABLE, installed xorg and xfce4 with default
settings:
$ portinstall --batch /usr/ports/x11/xorg /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4
Then I
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
: On 19/05/2010 10:25, Alex Dupre wrote:
: Dominic Fandrey ha scritto:
: I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
: and no idea why it fails to do so.
:
: Theoretically a port should not download anything in the build stage,
: but currently the
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
Since the xorg update my xfce4 desktop has become unusable. I always
get the error message below. I even setup FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE from
scratch, updated to 8.0-STABLE, installed xorg and xfce4 with default
settings:
...
So now everything should be
I'm trying to do a full upgrade of everything for the first time in a
while. After many gyrations, I've run into something that appears to
not be my fault :-):
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DRL_NO_COMPAT \
-o gdb gdb.o libgdb.a \
-lreadline
On 05/19/10 10:46, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
Since the xorg update my xfce4 desktop has become unusable. I always
get the error message below. I even setup FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE from
scratch, updated to 8.0-STABLE, installed xorg and xfce4 with default
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:56:05 +0200
Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Since the xorg update my xfce4 desktop has become unusable. I always
get the error message below. I even setup FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE from
scratch, updated to 8.0-STABLE, installed xorg and xfce4 with default
Hi,
Today I upgraded the portmaster port to 2.27 and I noticed that there
was no completion anymore with my zsh. I was using it like portmaster
-tab where tab gave me all the options available, I was able to do
portmaster tab to use portsdir pattern too. Now there is nothing !
Are these
This message contains graphics. If you don't see them, [1]view this
email in your browser
[2]New Groundbreaking E-Commerce Web Site, Wubbit.com
[3]Authors Wubbit! Click Here to View Video
o Avoid paying middlemen a huge share of
On 05/19/10 09:37, David DEMELIER wrote:
Hi,
Today I upgraded the portmaster port to 2.27 and I noticed that there
was no completion anymore with my zsh. I was using it like portmaster
-tab where tab gave me all the options available, I was able to do
portmaster tab to use portsdir pattern
The user reports in private e-mail that the completions file is installed, but
it's still not working. Can a zsh user help him out?
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your
(This goes to all the maintainers of ports with an archivers/xz
dependency.)
The xz utils and lzma library have been imported into base for
9.0-CURRENT and 8.0-STABLE. The patch below makes the dependency
on the archivers/xz port conditional on OSVERSION.
I have not bumped PORTREVISION.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:11 AM, joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to know if there is a way to tell a port that it depend
on an other port
but build with particulars options.
Eg : port foo build depend on bar but won't build if bar is not build
with
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk writes:
On 19/05/2010 24:18:13, Anonymous wrote:
This doesn't concern only portmaster. As I've mentioned previously
xorg-server, subversion and git don't install any config file (not even
in share/examples) but still look for it inside PREFIX not
On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:07:25 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 08:11:48 +0200
joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way to tell a port that it depend
on an other port
but build with particulars options.
Eg : port foo build depend
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:27:35AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The user reports in private e-mail that the completions file is installed,
but it's still not working. Can a zsh user help him out?
Yes, sorry I forgot everytime to answer to all...
--
Demelier David
2010/5/19 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de:
I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
and no idea why it fails to do so.
Fetching
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/147491/jdk6-jaxp-2010_01_15.zip
manually works fine. But if I do that the file will just
On Wed 19 May 2010 at 05:10:49 PDT jhell wrote:
Adding to this bundle of madness...
I believe that it would be best practice to keep ports/LEGAL up-to-date
with this list.
Those who already have ports on a machine may find it more usefull to
find them there.
Quoting ports/LEGAL:
Some of the
I've got an port patch that includes adding entirely new ports along
with it. Should these new ports be submitted in separate PRs or along
with the maintainer update for the one existing port?
--
Russell A. Jackson r...@csub.edu
Network Analyst
California State University, Bakersfield
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:59:50AM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote:
I've got an port patch that includes adding entirely new ports along
with it. Should these new ports be submitted in separate PRs or along
with the maintainer update for the one existing port?
It's a matter of preference I think.
Demelier David demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:27:35AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The user reports in private e-mail that the completions file is installed,
but it's still not working. Can a zsh user help him out?
Yes, sorry I forgot everytime to answer to
On 19/05/2010 20:10, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2010/5/19 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de:
I have no idea, why it tries to download something during build,
and no idea why it fails to do so.
Fetching
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/147491/jdk6-jaxp-2010_01_15.zip
manually
Is ports/LEGAL prominent enough? Â Should I also add something to the
pkg-descr?
I'd rather not. I remember some work about adding licensing support to
the ports framework but can't seem to find it now. Perhaps tools like
portmaster or portupgrade could be modified to warn the user when
On 05/19/10 12:26, Eitan Adler wrote:
Is ports/LEGAL prominent enough? Should I also add something to the
pkg-descr?
I'd rather not. I remember some work about adding licensing support to
the ports framework but can't seem to find it now. Perhaps tools like
portmaster or portupgrade could be
On Wed, 19 May 2010 19:42:44 +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
(This goes to all the maintainers of ports with an archivers/xz
dependency.)
The xz utils and lzma library have been imported into base for
9.0-CURRENT and 8.0-STABLE. The patch below makes the dependency
on the archivers/xz
Max Brazhnikov m...@issp.ac.ru wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 19:42:44 +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
(This goes to all the maintainers of ports with an archivers/xz
dependency.)
The xz utils and lzma library have been imported into base for
9.0-CURRENT and 8.0-STABLE. The patch below
On 05/19/10 01:15, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:310)
I have seen that before... Have you enabled IPv6
Stacy Millions wrote:
: On 05/19/10 01:15, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
:
: java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument
: at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
: at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:310)
:
: I have seen that before...
2010/5/19 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com:
Demelier David demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:27:35AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The user reports in private e-mail that the completions file is installed,
but it's still not working. Can a zsh user help him out?
Yes,
On 05/19/10 14:00, David DEMELIER wrote:
mark...@melon ~ $ sudo portmaster -tab
Try just:
portmaster -tab
Also, see the portmaster man page about setting up PM_SU_CMD.
hth,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
2010/5/19 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 05/19/10 14:00, David DEMELIER wrote:
mark...@melon ~ $ sudo portmaster -tab
Try just:
portmaster -tab
Also, see the portmaster man page about setting up PM_SU_CMD.
I guess I'm the problem, I tested with a empty .zshrc and it works.
Sorry for
On 05/19/10 14:05, David DEMELIER wrote:
I tested with a empty .zshrc and it works. Sorry for the noise.
No worries, glad it worked out for you. :)
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness
On 05/19/10 14:50, Damian Gerow wrote:
Stacy Millions wrote:
: On 05/19/10 01:15, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
:
: java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument
: at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
: at
Stacy Millions wrote:
: On 05/19/10 14:50, Damian Gerow wrote:
: Stacy Millions wrote:
: : On 05/19/10 01:15, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
: :
: : java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument
: : at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
: : at
On 05/19/10 10:35, Frank Mayhar wrote:
I'm trying to do a full upgrade of everything for the first time in a
while. After many gyrations, I've run into something that appears to
not be my fault :-):
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DRL_NO_COMPAT \
-o gdb gdb.o libgdb.a
On May 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Wed 19 May 2010 at 05:10:49 PDT jhell wrote:
Adding to this bundle of madness...
I believe that it would be best practice to keep ports/LEGAL up-to-date
with this list.
Those who already have ports on a machine may find it more
Dough
Ah, I see. That looks to have worked correctly.
Thanks
Jurgen
On 17/05/10 4:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/16/10 23:14, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Perhaps I've confused the threads. But this issue appears to be a simple
one: I've installed the www/apache22 port but with certain
On 05/19/10 17:19, Jurgen Weber wrote:
Dough
Ah, I see. That looks to have worked correctly.
Excellent!
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a
On 20/05/10 10:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/19/10 17:19, Jurgen Weber wrote:
Dough
Ah, I see. That looks to have worked correctly.
Excellent!
Hi Doug
Can I suggest a note in the man page about this. For many users this is likely
the first time they would hit this discrepancy with the
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
(This goes to all the maintainers of ports with an archivers/xz
dependency.)
The xz utils and lzma library have been imported into base for
9.0-CURRENT and 8.0-STABLE. The patch below makes the dependency
on the archivers/xz port conditional on OSVERSION.
I
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:51:30PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
The ports in the devel category are especially noteworthy, since (if I
understand correctly) their license will infect anything
built with them.
Is ports/LEGAL
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:51:30PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
The ports in the devel category are especially noteworthy, since (if I
understand correctly) their
58 matches
Mail list logo
