On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:50:42 +0400 Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
given that .8 part of compat5x
version (5.4.0.8) indicates patchlevel, I guess I'll have to use
5.4.0.8.1.
Seems that 5.4.0.9 may be a better choice here.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..Makefile, line 26: Unassociated shell
command -I${LOCALBASE}/include
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== graphics/aeskulap failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/portmgr/tindex/ports.
*** Error
Hi,
Penning Classics and garnering praise from Bono, Peter Gabriel Oasis THE
GUARDIAN
Songwriting from the top drawer TIME OUT.
Imagine McCartney's craftsmanship and Springsteen's power and you'll get the
gist Q MAGAZINE
As it seems I am only really know by famous novelists and rock
2010/8/23 Philip Paeps phi...@freebsd.org:
On 2010-08-23 08:56:18 (+0400), Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
I kinda hate having to wait for a timeout instead of approval. If not
timeouts then you're just too slow, committing an update just before
next release. This makes window for players
* Boris Samorodov (b...@ipt.ru) wrote:
given that .8 part of compat5x
version (5.4.0.8) indicates patchlevel, I guess I'll have to use
5.4.0.8.1.
Seems that 5.4.0.9 may be a better choice here.
Yes, but judging from commit message:
(update misc/compat5x to 5.4.0.8)
Upgrade to
Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru writes:
* Boris Samorodov (b...@ipt.ru) wrote:
given that .8 part of compat5x
version (5.4.0.8) indicates patchlevel, I guess I'll have to use
5.4.0.8.1.
Seems that 5.4.0.9 may be a better choice here.
Yes, but judging from commit message:
(update
Please see message below for a problem with non-default gcc (e.g. gcc44) and
port(s) that use tmake.
Looking in lib/unix/generic.t we see:
...
### Compiler, tools and options
CC ?= #$ Expand(TMAKE_CC);
CXX ?= #$ Expand(TMAKE_CXX);
CFLAGS += #$ Expand(TMAKE_CFLAGS);
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I wonder if maintainer of devel/tmake reads this list and just forgot to update
him email address or if the port has become silently unmaintained.
Or something else?
I'll bounce the undelivered email to this list as well.
Original Message
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
[ping]
on 16/06/2010 08:44 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Version 2.2b2 of drraw seems to support newer features of rrdtool like more
convenient VDEF/CDEF specification, STACK flag, and generally looks cooler :)
http://web.taranis.org/drraw/
Version number indicates that it is beta,
Hi all,
as you have probably noticed (I broke the INDEX twice in the last 24h
[tnx pav@ for promptly fixing it!]), I have committed a set of changes
to the ports related to the FOX ToolKit.
Here's a brief summary.
= Added ports =
- x11-toolkits/fox17
. introduction to the new
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:01:14PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Let me explain what transpired in chronological order:
On 2010/05/11, ehaupt committed the following patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/shells/bash/files/patch-Makefile.in
And bumped PORTREVISION (from 0 to
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:50:42AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Distfiles for misc/compat5x are shipped with schg file set on some
files. This makes it impossible to install port with raised
securitylevel, as clearing schg flag is impossible in that case.
See [1].
If nobody minds, I'm
Hi!
Could you please tell me when can be released dovecot-1.2.14 and
dovecot-2.0.1? The versions 1.2.13 and 2.0.0 are released for couple of
weeks, but ports are not created.
Greetings
DZIOBAK
--
Saloon gier - to nas
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:01:14PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Let me explain what transpired in chronological order:
On 2010/05/11, ehaupt committed the following patch:
Hi Bruno,
On, Sat Aug 14, 2010, Bruno d'Arcangeli wrote:
Hi,
Do you plan to port blender 2.53?
Yes, as soon as it will be released as a stable version.
I know that it is a beta version but it is really stable.
The ongoing changes within the blender SVN, which scares me to update
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:46:49 +0200
DZIOBAK dzioba...@interia.pl articulated:
Could you please tell me when can be released dovecot-1.2.14 and
dovecot-2.0.1? The versions 1.2.13 and 2.0.0 are released for couple
of weeks, but ports are not created.
While releasing the former into the ports
The Restless Daemon identified a mtree error while trying to build:
fxscintilla-2.11.0 maintained by po...@freebsd.org
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/x11-toolkits/fxscintilla/Makefile,v 1.37
2010/08/24 07:17:31 gahr Exp $
Excerpt from
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:46:49 +0200
DZIOBAK dzioba...@interia.pl articulated:
Could you please tell me when can be released dovecot-1.2.14 and
dovecot-2.0.1? The versions 1.2.13 and 2.0.0 are released for couple
of
x11-toolkits/fxscintilla, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:04:48PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:46:49 +0200
DZIOBAK dzioba...@interia.pl articulated:
Could you please tell me when can be released dovecot-1.2.14 and
dovecot-2.0.1? The versions 1.2.13 and 2.0.0 are released for couple
of weeks, but ports
21 matches
Mail list logo
