Re: OPTIONS (was: editors/vim installs to /)

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/2 David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:24:59AM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: What is sufficiently clean ? I wonder what is not clean in the options framework, so please tell me then we still can clean it? When the Ports Collection was invented, ports maintainers

swftools and Python

2010-10-03 Thread Norman Khine
hello, i have built the swftools port but from the make/install configure it does not seem to find Python.h so when i run: $ python -c 'import gfx' Traceback (most recent call last): File string, line 1, in module ImportError: No module named gfx how do i enable this? thanks norman --

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote: 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings. Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come from /var/db/ports/${PORTNAME}/options on the 2nd and later

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to add to ports to check what was entered by the user. At

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to add

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_

openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
Hi, I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore, readlicense_oo need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/ Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox,

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seamanm.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to add to ports to check what was

Re: openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore

2010-10-03 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## David DEMELIER (demelier.da...@gmail.com): I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore, readlicense_oo need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/ I've not yet seen

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/10/2010 10:45:01, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote: 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings. Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come from

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 03/10/2010 10:45:01, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote: 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings. Why can I not set PREFIX

Re: openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore

2010-10-03 Thread ajtiM
On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote: Hi, I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore, readlicense_oo need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/

Re: openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore

2010-10-03 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/10/3 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com: On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote: Hi, I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,         readlicense_oo need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 03/10/2010 12:48, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't

Re: OPTIONS

2010-10-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 03/10/2010 12:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: 2010/10/3 Matthew Seamanm.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk: I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code

Re: FreeBSD Port: gnash-0.8.7_4

2010-10-03 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Andriy Gapon (a...@icyb.net.ua) wrote: Gnash port was updated, sorry for delay and thanks for waiting! The following patch is required for compilation with gcc44+. It's definitely an upstream issue: --- libbase/tu_file.h.orig2010-10-01 16:39:16.419334667 +0300 +++ libbase/tu_file.h

Re: editors/vim installs to /

2010-10-03 Thread jhell
On 10/02/2010 02:49, Ade Lovett wrote: editors/vim -- fully functional console-only (no X11) editors/vim-lite -- stripped down version (again, no X11, perhaps even linked static for use within embedded systems) editors/vim-gui -- take your pick. X11 is implied. athena/motif widgets

databases/postgresql90-{client, server, contrib} not hooked up to ports

2010-10-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Is there any reason why the 3 postgresql90 ports aren't mentioned in ${PORTSDIR}/databases/Makefile ? They seem to work perfectly well for installing postgresql-9.0.0 Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard

Re: databases/postgresql90-{client, server, contrib} not hooked up to ports

2010-10-03 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Nope, no reason, my mistake! Thanks, I will fix that. PAlle --On 3 oktober 2010 23.28.42 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Is there any reason why the 3 postgresql90 ports aren't mentioned in ${PORTSDIR}/databases/Makefile ? They seem to work perfectly well for

Re: ident strings in pkg-plist

2010-10-03 Thread John Hein
Doug Barton wrote at 15:58 -0700 on Oct 3, 2010: Changing the list to have a real discussion about this. On 10/3/2010 3:49 PM, John Hein wrote: I'll mention that it has come in handy for me in the past. I put it into the category of ident strings in binaries. It has a similar

Re: pokerTH

2010-10-03 Thread Dereckson
Good evening, I contacted the port maintainer Thursday evening. All is fine, he already submitted an update the Tuesday. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151020 -- Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson http://www.dereckson.be/ -- Forwarded message -- From: Guido Falsi