lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
lang/guile build fails in my environment with CURRENT amd64 FreeBSD and gcc45 as ports compiler: ./guile_filter_doc_snarfage --filter-snarfage) regex-posix.doc || { rm regex-posix.doc; false; } cat alist.doc arbiters.doc async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc chars.doc continuations.doc debug.doc

Re: RFC: some patches to the Porter's Handbook

2011-06-01 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 2011-06-01 07:04, Mark Linimon wrote: When going through the Using sections, I always get irritated by having to figure out where the makevars that they are talking about are defined. This patch adds some crossrefs to the CVSWeb pages for them. (In a few cases, the filenames were

Re: RFC: some patches to the Porter's Handbook

2011-06-01 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:10:06AM +0200, Carsten Jensen wrote: While doing the revision, would it be too much trouble to add a section for web apps ? Sorry, I don't know enough about them to add that section ... mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/06/2011 09:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: lang/guile build fails in my environment with CURRENT amd64 FreeBSD and gcc45 as ports compiler: It also fails for me on stable/8 with base gcc as ports compiler, but in a different fashion at configure step: checking for lt_dlinit in

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Andriy Gapon (a...@freebsd.org): It also fails for me on stable/8 with base gcc as ports compiler, but in a different fashion at configure step: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl... no configure: error: libltdl not found. See README. === Script configure failed unexpectedly. From

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:36:46PM +0300 I heard the voice of Andriy Gapon, and lo! it spake thus: It also fails for me on stable/8 with base gcc as ports compiler, but in a different fashion at configure step: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl... no configure: error: libltdl not found. See

Re: lang/guile build fails for me (SOLVED)

2011-06-01 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
for me, it worked when I comment the line that says USE_NCURSES, in the Makefile line 25. Probably an error in the configure logic... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 01.06.2011 13:44, schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder: ## Andriy Gapon (a...@freebsd.org): It also fails for me on stable/8 with base gcc as ports compiler, but in a different fashion at configure step: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl... no configure: error: libltdl not found. See README.

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de): From config.log: configure:11579: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl configure:11604: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=nocona -I/usr/local/include -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib conftest.c -lltdl 5

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 01.06.2011 15:19, schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder: ## Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de): From config.log: configure:11579: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl configure:11604: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=nocona -I/usr/local/include

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/6/1 Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de: Am 01.06.2011 15:19, schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder: ## Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de): From config.log: configure:11579: checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl configure:11604: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/06/2011 16:19 Christoph Moench-Tegeder said the following: Ah, yes, LDFLAGS. The port's Makefile already has LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib in $CONFIGURE_ENV, and as guile's configure BTW, I think that CONFIGURE_ENV in the port's Makefile better be set with +=, for safety. is a standard

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Here is a real fix. if someone can check with the maintainer et commit this that would be great (I can't do it myself before monday) regards, Bapt --- Makefile31 May 2011 03:49:09 - 1.83 +++ Makefile1 Jun 2011 14:22:04 - @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ USE_LDCONFIG= yes USE_NCURSES=

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 01.06.2011 15:57, schrieb Andriy Gapon: on 01/06/2011 16:19 Christoph Moench-Tegeder said the following: Ah, yes, LDFLAGS. The port's Makefile already has LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib in $CONFIGURE_ENV, and as guile's configure BTW, I think that CONFIGURE_ENV in the port's Makefile better

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/6/1 Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de: Am 01.06.2011 15:57, schrieb Andriy Gapon: on 01/06/2011 16:19 Christoph Moench-Tegeder said the following: Ah, yes, LDFLAGS. The port's Makefile already has LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib in $CONFIGURE_ENV, and as guile's configure BTW, I think

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 01.06.2011 16:30, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: If someone comes with a better solution for USE_NCURSES please be aware that the solution will also fits with USE_OPENSSL so that the job won't be done twice. Anyway I think the fix is not to add anyflags to configure_env manually (would it

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/06/2011 17:24 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: Here is a real fix. if someone can check with the maintainer et commit this that would be great (I can't do it myself before monday) Just in case: the fix does help. I also like your idea about always adding LDFLAGS to CONFIGURE_ENV.

Re: lang/guile build fails for me

2011-06-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/6/1 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org: on 01/06/2011 17:24 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: Here is a real fix. if someone can check with the maintainer et commit this that would be great (I can't do it myself before monday) Just in case: the fix does help. I also like your idea about

Re: editors/libreoffice: can not compile, crash on, FreeBSD 9.0-CUR/amd64 - msg#00540

2011-06-01 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 05/31/11 15:09, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 31/05/2011 15:22 Olivier Smedts said the following: 2011/5/31 Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org: on 31/05/2011 12:11 Olivier Smedts said the following: Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) That core dump should be investigated / debugged. At the very

GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or expired??

2011-06-01 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, (more details far below) It seems somebody isn't very knowledgeable about GPC. :-( Here's the real deal: *BSD hates GPL, esp. GPLv3, and I think GPC is indeed v3 (though it's only using GCC 3.4.4 or buggy newer 4.1.2 backends, nothing beyond that). Since there are backend bugs that

Recomendations of PDF tools for editing PDF version 1.6 1.7 ?

2011-06-01 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@, Any reccomendations what tools are best to edit new PDFs please ? As discussed on another thread on this list, openoffice doesnt build here, so reccomendations of smaller tools would be nice please. Ideally native. I dont really want the hastle of linux emulation, (though rather that