cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports # cvs update # portupgrade -ai The FreeBSD handbook describes (or

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports # cvs update # portupgrade -ai

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat errors are not - AFAIK - reproducible by

[removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my FreeBSD account). Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my FreeBSD account).

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:31:49 -0500 Sahil Tandon articulated: It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 15.11.2011 16:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Rees
On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my FreeBSD account).

Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog

2011-11-15 Thread miwi
Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: closed-open State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:26:29 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Maintainer has approved. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 ___

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Jase Thew
On 15/11/2011 14:31, Sahil Tandon wrote: It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat

Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog

2011-11-15 Thread miwi
Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:51:48 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: close again was a mistake http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 ___

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking activity postconf wants to run? -- -- Pav

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Daniel Nebdal on Tuesday, 15 November 2011: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 17:07 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 18:04 Chris Rees said the following: On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a purposefully no-networking

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen. portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen. portmaster -L will warn you about

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Rees
On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 19:25, Chris Rees wrote: On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like

Re: multimedia/phonon: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if):

2011-11-15 Thread Boris Samorodov
15.11.2011 01:29, Raphael Kubo da Costa пишет: Thanks, I've just fixed this upstream and added my fix to area51 (r7826). I'll commit it to ports as soon as I get an OK from avilla or makc. Great, the port compiles now. Thanks! BTW, you were supposed to get a warning instead of an error too,

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

2011-11-15 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long time, since it seem that to put a .if defined(USE_PURE) .include ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk .endif In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice.

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

2011-11-15 Thread Zhihao Yuan
Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox

horde4-base www moved

2011-11-15 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, I did a make deinstall/reinstall of horde4-base and to my surprise the installation placed the web accessible files in /usr/local/lib/php/pear/www/horde/ and they used to be in /usr/local/www/horde Is this intentional or did I mess anything up somewhere? I have no special options set