on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we
should for have a closer look at it.
Yeah. BTW, I can confirm that with this version of boost I can now build
libreoffice with gcc 4.6.
The only change I had to
on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we
should for have a closer look at it.
And, just in case, what I did was put the following line into
tools/build/v2/user-config.jam:
using gcc : 4.6 : g++46 ;
But
Alex Dupre wrote on 24.01.2012 07:55:
Marco Steinbach ha scritto:
shouldn't I be able to fetch distfiles for conflicting ports, if
DISABLE_CONFLICTS is set ?
Yes, but in this case you should also set -DNO_IGNORE
That did the trick -- thank you.
MfG Coco
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:05:54AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we
should for have a closer look at it.
And, just in case, what I did was put the following line
Hi!
There is an error while compiling devel/py-lxml at 10-CURRENT:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.10.20120114180333/py27-lxml-2.3.2.log
I managed to compile the port with the following patch, but I'm sure
there is a proper way to do it. Here is the patch:
-
---
Hi, Boris!
Boris Samorodov wrote on 24.01.2012 12:58:
Hi!
There is an error while compiling devel/py-lxml at 10-CURRENT:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.10.20120114180333/py27-lxml-2.3.2.log
I managed to compile the port with the following patch, but I'm sure
there
The behavior of portmaster with -o new port dir in /usr/ports
installed port (as the man page puts it), doesn't seem to be quite
what one would expect.
While endeavoring to upgrade the already installed lang/gcc44 to
lang/gcc46 using the command:
portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
what happens with:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44
?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500
Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
what happens with:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44
?
Well, since gcc44 is no longer installed,
Redirecting the mail to po...@freebsd.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team
does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success
here :)
_ pancakekin...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3 as a binary the
other day.
Running both:
#
On 1/24/12 10:39 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Redirecting the mail to po...@freebsd.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team
does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success
here :)
_pancakekin...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500
Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
what happens with:
# portmaster
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800
Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500
Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
#
Hi Team,
I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long
ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove
sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially dangerous?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org wrote:
Redirecting the mail to po...@freebsd.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team
does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success
here :)
_ pancakekin...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3
The following reply was made to PR ports/16440; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/16440: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:15:26 + (UTC)
scheidell2012-01-24 19:15:15 UTC
Hi Justin,
On 24 January 2012 17:58, Janketh Jay jan...@unfs.us wrote:
Hi Team,
I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long
ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove
sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially
On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
=== Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports
=== Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.2008 to
gcc-4.4.7.20120117
lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
(What is the preceding line -- with the -- and the similar one
below,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:31:54 -0800
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
=== Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports
=== Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.2008 to
gcc-4.4.7.20120117
lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
On 01/24/2012 13:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an
unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option?
No, usually it works with the package name as the second argument (or
even a glob pattern as long as it resolves to a unique
On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
=== Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports
=== Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.2008 to
gcc-4.4.7.20120117
lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
(What is the
Thank you, sir! :)
On 01/24/2012 01:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi Justin,
On 24 January 2012 17:58, Janketh Jay jan...@unfs.us wrote:
Hi Team,
I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long
ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove
The subject listed port attempts to apply the patch via its $CWD but if $CWD is
not in not within the $MASTERDIR then the patch fails to apply. Please adjust
the following...
.if ${OSVERSION} 97
EXTRA_PATCHES=files/patch8-utmp.diff
.endif
To:
.if ${OSVERSION} 97
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:13:01AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal thus spake:
The subject listed port attempts to apply the patch via its $CWD but if $CWD
is not in not within the $MASTERDIR then the patch fails to apply. Please
adjust the following...
24 matches
Mail list logo
