Would someone work on ports/233749, please? The original security fix
was committed to head 15 days ago, but has yet to be merged to quarterly.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
The devel/gdb port supports optional python integration (so that you can
write python scripts that work with gdb internals to define custom commands,
pretty printers, etc.). This means gdb can be linked against different
python versions. I decided to add flavors to the gdb port to handle the
## Ian Lepore (i...@freebsd.org):
> That's a bit of a harsh tone to take with a user who has questions.
Sorry, the day is getting long (and it doesn't sound that harsh in german,
it definitively wasn't meant that harsh).
> If
> Bob was an aspiring ports developer, maybe a response like that
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 2018/12/12 19:46:
Hi!
The system in question is an RPI3 running r341643.
That will hurt. A regular chromium build takes about 16 CPU-hours on
my fairly modern i7 CPU, SSDs and large RAM. Parallel compilation helps
a lot, keeping 16 CPU threads busy and my feet warm
## bob prohaska (f...@www.zefox.net):
> > See bsd.ports.mk: DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS (as in "make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS").
> >
> Thank you, I think that's the information needed. Come to think of it,
> will the -j option, such as -j2, work in this situation also? Two threads
> are much better than one
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:41:49PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## bob prohaska (f...@www.zefox.net):
>
> > How much memory should be required for
> > make -DBATCH
> > in www/chromium?
>
> Quite a lot, multiple GBs.
>
>
> I'm not even sure if your SD card will survive that :)
>
No, it doesn't. The PORTREVISION in the individual ports were bumped, so
they will get rebuilt with gcc7 if you set the DEFAULT_VERSION, but it will
still show as dated and be rebuilt by any postmaster or poudriere general
update.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 10:40 AM Steve Kargl On Wed, Dec 12, 2018
## Kurt Jaeger (p...@freebsd.org):
> How can this parallel compilation be configured for chromium in poudriere ?
Look for ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS and/or ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES in poudriere.conf.
That's what does the trick for my poudriere :)
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space.
Hi!
> > The system in question is an RPI3 running r341643.
>
> That will hurt. A regular chromium build takes about 16 CPU-hours on
> my fairly modern i7 CPU, SSDs and large RAM. Parallel compilation helps
> a lot, keeping 16 CPU threads busy and my feet warm (building chromium
> alone takes 1
## bob prohaska (f...@www.zefox.net):
> How much memory should be required for
> make -DBATCH
> in www/chromium?
Quite a lot, multiple GBs.
> The system in question is an RPI3 running r341643.
That will hurt. A regular chromium build takes about 16 CPU-hours on
my fairly modern i7 CPU, SSDs
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:29:59AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> This morning the PORTREVISION on at least hundreds of ports was bumped
> because gcc8 was declared as the "canonical" version. As a result, I will
> have about 300 ports to rebuild which will take many hours.
> Why?
>
> If a port is
This morning the PORTREVISION on at least hundreds of ports was bumped
because gcc8 was declared as the "canonical" version. As a result, I will
have about 300 ports to rebuild which will take many hours.
Why?
If a port is built and running properly with gcc7, I see no reason to force
the rebuild
How much memory should be required for
make -DBATCH
in www/chromium?
Make issues warnings about disk space required, but I don't recall seeing
anything about RAM or swap.
The system in question is an RPI3 running r341643. Make reached part
[18416/30819], at which point it seems to have
Perfect! Thanks for the replies and the clarification, guys!
On 12/11/18 11:21 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating
14 matches
Mail list logo
