Hi all,
Since the work on the new options framework has been started more than 2 years
ago, we faced a problem with the make config interface.
dialog(1) is too limited to be able to represent in a simple UI all the features
proposed by the new framework.
The idea of writing a new UI was born at
Hi all,
With r337100, we do stop registering recursively the dependency.
As a result the dependency tracking is better and finer grain, as a side effect,
tinderbox and poudriere users do need to rebuild all their packages from
scratch.
For poudriere pass the -c to the bulk option.
regards,
hi all,
The 2014Q3 branch has just been branched and the package builder has been
updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the quarterly
packages will be on the 2014Q3 branch
What happen during the last 3 months:
- 177 different committers have participated
- 9918 commits
Hi,
As you may know, the ports tree currently provides two versions of the
X.Org server and related pieces of software:
1. xserver 1.7, Mesa 7.6 and libdrm 2.4.17
2. xserver 1.12, Mesa 9.1 and libdrm 2.4.52
We are about to remove the older set. The primary reason is the
maintenance cost.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:30:52PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
hostings nowadays.
Other common feature among them is absence of official tarballs
for versions. I don't say, that ALL projects whith
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
really important.
With github this fortunately is a non-issue. Even
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:53:20PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Hello,
I moved all my servers (about 40) to the pkgng (new generation)
package/port
system, and I can say that it is amazing... it is not yet finish, and
have some
minor issues, but works very well, and is lightning
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:16:19PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
Sergio wrote:
I moved all my servers (about 40) to the pkgng (new generation)
package/port
system, and I can say that it is amazing... it is not yet finish, and
have some
minor issues, but works very well, and is lightning
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06:
Hi,
CCd eadler@ as he did last commit.
When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:36:14AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Thanks you very much
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:55:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm on 9-current r225756 amd64. Since the latest version of libreoffice
was committed I always get stuck with cppunittest pegging the cpu at
100% and never completing. I've tried removing the port and letting
libreoffice reinstall it
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:12:31PM +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
On 04.10.2011 06:10, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/03/2011 07:32, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
I have the same problem (9.0 BETA3 amd64)
When I set libreoffice's DEBUG option, the build (`make`) does
complete.
Thanks, that
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 8 October 2011 10:53, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: net-mgmt/portmon
deprecated because: No more public distfiles
I was able to fetch it earlier today:
$ ( cd
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi folks,
As crees@ suggested, I'm sending an email to ports@ about this.
What really bothers me when I use the FreeBSD Ports tree on one of my
systems, is that the behaviour of dealing with services is quite
inconsistent. As
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:50:12PM +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hi
I need help to solve this. Has anyone seen this error?
Thanks
/Leslie
[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libswfb.so
[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libmswordfb.so
[ build LOG ] sw
sw deliver
deliver -- version: 275594
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:43:25PM -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Hi!
I noticed the following in the commit log:
%
% Modified files:
%.MOVED
%develMakefile
%graphics Makefile
% Removed files:
%devel/soup
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn?
If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored.
I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile
(via my
FreeBSD account).
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:40:02AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
[ Adding port mainter to Cc: ]
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:15:17 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
The recently updated port devel/yajl is not building due to the lack of
a tarrball:
= lloyd-yajl-2.0.1-f4b2b1a.tar.gz doesn't seem to
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Or that they simply quit doing that and instead print a message like Port
X is
deinstalled but it may have some processes running, please do Y and/or Z
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:25:25PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/09/2011 13:18, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:09:09AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/12/2011 21:55 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 08:00:05AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: misc/gtkfind
description:The program to use to have to remember all the options
to find(1)
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
deprecated
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:10:57PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
In the new PkgNG :
https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/pkg/add.c
the following statement is written :
if (geteuid() != 0) {
warnx(adding packages can only be done as
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:13:19PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:10:57PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
In the new PkgNG :
https://github.com/pkgng
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:10:52AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
(I posted this to -office but I would've CC'd -ports too.)
Hello;
I think we should have a port the new fonts that the Google
Chrome OS developers have made to replace the so-called
Liberation fonts:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Alexander, guys,
are there boost 1.48.0 ports available in any form?
Patches for testing, alternative repo, etc.
Thank you.
There have been people saying they were working on it, but I don't remember who.
maybe sunpoet? not
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/01/2012 00:44 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Alexander, guys,
are there boost 1.48.0 ports available in any form? Patches for testing
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:22:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff
and I need testers for it.
Baptiste,
it seems that along with some removed patches
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:05:54AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we
should for have a closer look at it.
And, just in case, what I did was put the following line
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain,
and they lack features:
- missing metadata
- no upgrade support
- no repository
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
This looks great!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Sample output of pkg info:
$ pkg info -f libreoffice:
Name : libreoffice
Version: 3.4.4
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
like
raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please create an issue
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:16:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
the name sucks though
it would
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:27:20AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:09:47PM +0100, Marco Steinbach wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
[...]
cd /usr/ports/
touch abc
touch: abc: Permission
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:23:35AM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 30.01.2012 16:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Hi,
What about pkgng support
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
Are there any i386 remote repos setup yet
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:08:46AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
to use pkgng:
echo WITH_PKGNG=yes /etc/make.conf
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
On ia64 9.9-CURRENT:
Script started on Wed Feb
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:51:08AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Julien Laffaye writes:
You didn't run pkg2ng.
thanks again. I missed that too. Is this somewhere
in pkg man pages? I didn't see it.
It is a one time operation when you are coming from the old
pkg_install, so it
As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before rc
and then stable
the second one is now out with the following changes:
* update bundled sqlite to 3.7.10
* add -n to pkg create to avoid packing already packed packages
* Fix rc script handling
* safer sbuf usage (this
Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it.
Changes:
* fix pkg add (it is been broken during beta2 sorry about that)
* fix manifest emitter: now really emit the pkg-message in message no more
description
* add %M to pkg query to show messages
* concat all pkg-messages and show it
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:15:34PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 10 February 2012 09:51, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before
rc
and then stable
the second one is now out with the following changes
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08:28PM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Em Sáb, 2012-02-11 às 00:38 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu:
Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it.
Changes:
* fix pkg add (it is been broken during beta2 sorry about that)
* fix manifest
beta6 is now out with the following changes:
* pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot
(thanks avg)
* pkg version: -v now print name-version to match behaviour of legacy
pkg_version
* pkg register: fix flatsize calculation
* new pkg-updating(1) man page (thanks
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:07:18PM +0100, Beat Gätzi wrote:
Hi,
pkgng support for tinderbox (written by bapt@) is ready and is looking for
some review and testers. The patch is against tinderbox HEAD:
http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/tinderbox-pkgng.patch
It also needs a database change:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:53:42PM -0200, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
beta6 is now out with the following changes:
* pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot
(thanks avg)
* pkg version
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:04:48PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/15/2012 14:27, George Liaskos wrote:
Thank you for the great work, pkg-updating.1 should be added in the MAN1
because pkg is currently falling under tinderbox.
Shouldn't stuff like updating packages be in sbin man section
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Beat Gätzi wrote:
2012/2/18 George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com:
There seems to be an issue with most of the x11-font ports, fonts.dir
and fonts.cache are not handled correctly.
Hi all,
this mail is also sent to ports@ has the problem we have with nvidia-driver
might also occur elsewhere and we need a general fix for that.
First what is the failure: nvidia driver overwrite libGL.so provided by another
package which is broken by design because the package database isn't
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:35:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:36:08PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
One of the issues with 'alternatives' implementations is that they are
not selectable per-user (including non superuser).
In this particular case (libGL), also
On 23.02.2012 08:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Thu, 23 Feb 2012
08:21:33 +0100):
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:35:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:36:08PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
One of the issues
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:56:22PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote at 11:28 + on Feb 23, 2012:
On 23.02.2012 08:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Do you havea list of packages which overzrite something, respectively
do you have a list of files which are overwriten
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:18:25PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 2/23/2012 13:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Another solution could be to add an entry (and drop it in deinstallation to
libmap.conf) when installing the nvidia driver, in that case installing it
ad
libGL-nvidia.so.1 and adding
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:18:25PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 2/23/2012 13:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Another solution could be to add an entry (and drop it in deinstallation to
libmap.conf) when installing the nvidia driver, in that case installing it
ad
libGL-nvidia.so.1 and adding
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:19:44PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:15 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Here is a patch to add support for includedir keyword to libmap.conf so
that we
I think this is overly complicated, and not generally useful. It also
delays the utility
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:19:15PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 03/01/12 07:18, Beat Gätzi wrote:
This one is already fixed:
http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/tinderbox-pkgng-v2.patch
D'oh. Thanks!
What to do about failures of these types ?
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:47:10AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:34:12AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/28/2012 14:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:19:44PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote
Hi,
We just released beta8 of pkgng, it comes with the usual fixes and some new
features:
pkg set is a new subcommand to modify the content of the local package database,
currently only modifying -a [01] the status wether the package as been installed
as a dependency or direct can be done.
pkg
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:56:17PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote:
Folks,
I've read the conversation on ports/156253 (Update devel/boost-* from
1.45 to 1.46.1) and decided to share current status of my work.
I have a patch for updating Boost to 1.48.0.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice
maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and
has
many improvemnts
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:08:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is
simpler than that:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:18:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
postgresql-contrib full text
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote:
I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I
keep running into is the previous versions failings... :(
I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build
Hi,
On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9
- changes:
* query -f has been replaced by query -F when querying a package (file) for
consistency with pkg info
* fix autoremove recursion
* pkg set -o oldorigin:neworigin allow the user to modify the origin of a
packages
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9
[...]
Please note that normally
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
be in ../lang.
cat pkg-descr
Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell,
Hi,
Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by
upstream since 2008.
on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able to
run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have a
newer version using php5 in the ports
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org
I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN
one in this regard?
In my point of view, no make
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:59:30PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:07 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:21:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On ia64 r231193M:
# pkg audit -F
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/auditfile.tbz 100% 76KB 75.8KB/s
75.8KB/s 00:00
0 problem(s) in your installed packages found.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
#
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:46:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
# pkg check -a
usage: pkg check [-yadsr]
pkg check [-ygxXdsr] pattern
For more information see 'pkg help check'.
#
According to the man page, this
should've worked, by processing
all packages.
-a is for
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
portmaster --check-depends used to take many seconds,
sometimes a minute to run. Now, with pkgng, it
exits immediately. Is this due to the efficiency
of the new tools? Or maybe this portmaster
option now does nothing and pkg
Hi, i found some issues on the parallel work with pkgng base.
For example while pkg2ng works, on the second console try to install
something:
% pkg install deco
current process can show multiple lines like:
Checking integrity...pkg: WARNING: locally installed (null)-(null)
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:22:49AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 04/16/2012 10:20 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Updating ports-mgmt/pkg to b11:
=== Installing for pkg-1.0.b11
===Generating temporary packing
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:54:07AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote:
I hope things will change once we get OPTIONS-NG in, since the new
framework will address (AFAIK) all the objections people have against
our current OPTIONS.
Is that a thing in
On 04/16/2012 10:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:46:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
# pkg check -a usage: pkg check [-yadsr] pkg check [-ygxXdsr]
pattern
For more information see 'pkg help check'. #
According to the man page, this should've
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:25:08PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 05:15:35PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:22:49AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 04/16/2012 10:20
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 02:07:57PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:31:37PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Well
Fixed in git thank you for reporting
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:05:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2012-Apr-18, 13:44, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:13:06PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:58:27PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:30:04AM -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed LibreOffice on FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.7.4 but there are no
programs in KDE Launcher menu - Office or in the other groups.
First I deinstalled 3.4 because I had some problem and installed 3.5.2.
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:57:27PM -0500, ajtiM wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2012 06:10:58 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:30:04AM -0500, ajtiM wrote:
I installed LibreOffice on FreeBSD 9.0 Release, KDE 4.7.4 but there are
no programs in KDE Launcher menu - Office
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:19:49AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
There are a couple of issues that prevent tinderbox from creating
tinderbox packages.
The first issue, which prevents packaging on RELENG_9 is simply a
wrong dependency path for x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf. This one
should
Hi,
My time deserved to work to porting LibreOffice to FreeBSD is now being very
low, I really need help on LibreOffice.
While 3.5.2.2 works quite well on FreeBSD, it still has some know issues:
- not working with lpd from base (no clue on this for now),
- fail to compile on recent current
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different boxes,
all failing compiling the
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
(the 3.5) with gcc
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Daniel Nebdal writes:
In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
return to
/data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2,
and run make, I get:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Daniel Nebdal writes:
In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:00:12AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Daniel Nebdal writes:
Making: libuno_sal.so.3
: ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found
dmake: Error code 1, while making
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Has anyone answered the original question? Are there going to be
packages for libreoffice? If not, why not?
Doug
Yes as soon as pointyhat builds are uploaded.
For example there are libreoffice packages on
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:34:37AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the ports
to improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework.
Great work! Looking quickly at the documentation I have a doubt:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:41:32PM -0400, Erwin Lansing wrote:
Hi,
portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the ports to
improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework. The new framework
not only streamlines the current inconsistencies, but also adds new
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:07:43PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Chanel jcha...@free.fr wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:53:40PM +0200, Jacques Chanel wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Jacques Chanel wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:34:20PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:28:45PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
Track shlibs: yes
bapt@ or whoever will track this bug: this is the
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:09:23AM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Jason Helfman wrote on 30.05.2012 03:57:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:29:01PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov thus spake:
Hi Baptiste,
Am I right that `make rmconfig' isn't working with optionsng?
I got this lines:
Hi all,
On of the reasons of bsd.options.desc.mk is to be able to share common options
and descriptions, to have better consistency between ports and to have general
meaning descriptions that make more sense, has anyone can improve the
description of an option.
about consistency, I can already
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:33:56PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Folks, when moving forward with optionsng, do we want to convert
NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES to options everywhere? I fear that if we
do, way too many ports which otherwise have no options will start asking
if I want the docs --
1 - 100 of 1204 matches
Mail list logo
