Re: www/firefox and mail/thunderbird localization

2012-02-21 Thread Beat Gaetzi
2012/2/21 Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru: On 21.02.2012 16:59, Olivier Smedts wrote: Some help from the gecko team ? :) It was not a success for me: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2012-February/026907.html Well gecko@ is not the same as gnome@ ;) Its's one of my open

Re: Firefox 3.6 installation problem

2010-03-13 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi, Hello,all! I'm trying to install firefox 3.6 from /usr/ports/www/firefox. First, I pkg_delete'd previousely installed firefox 3.0, but when doing make install clean I see the following errors: ../../dist/system_wrappers/pango/pango.h:3:30: error: pango/pango.h: No such file or directory

Re: FreeBSD Port: lightning-0.9_3

2010-04-23 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi, On 04/23/10 07:32, David Probst wrote: I was wondering if you could tell me if the FreeBSD 8.0 port for lightning 1.0+ to run with Thunderbird 3 is going to be available in the near future. You could use the lightning port from our development repository: # svn co

Re: mail/thunderbird3 does not build with gcc 4.5.1

2010-06-22 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 22.06.2010 09:23, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/21/10 23:25, b. f. wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with gcc 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt Before you embark on this

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-03 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the native version and get out of clunky font land sometime soon. :) Do y'all have a roadmap? If I missed it, my

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-03 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the native version and get

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-03 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-04 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-05 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote: On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-10 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 08/05/10 03:27, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote: On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-11 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 08/10/10 14:38, Jimmie James wrote: On 08/10/10 08:30, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 08/05/10 03:27, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote: On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just

Re: Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video

2010-10-26 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 25.10.2010 23:03, Ilya A. Arhipov wrote: Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video. You can look here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605861 Also i create pr: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151728 Committed. Thanks! Beat

Re: Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video

2010-10-26 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 26.10.2010 15:45, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 25.10.2010 23:03, Ilya A. Arhipov wrote: Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video. You can look here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605861 Also i create pr: http

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-15 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 14.11.2010 22:00, Kris Moore wrote: On Sun 14/11/10 3:44 PM , Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Kris Moore writes: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:24:44PM -0700, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/11/2010 18:18 Warren Block said the following: On Sat, 13 Nov

Re: VirtualBox 3.0.51 r22902_2 not installing on 7.2-RELEASE amd64

2009-10-13 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi, Maxim wrote: I have problems with make install VirtualBox from ports on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64. Ports are cvsupped. Install options selected: QT4, DBUS. All other options unchecked. I have reviewed make log for errors but didn't find any. Could you please try building with X11

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Rainer Hurling wrote: On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Mon, Dec

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Beat Gaetzi wrote: Rainer Hurling wrote: On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht

Re: Call for tester: VirtualBox 3.1.2 for FreeBSD

2009-12-28 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Philipp Wuensche wrote: Martin Wilke wrote: Please report any functionality which was working with previous versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build failure. Seem like the fix from

Call for tester: VirtualBox 3.1.2 for FreeBSD (take 2)

2010-01-04 Thread Beat Gaetzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, First of all thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. We have updated the ports to fix the reported problems: - - virtualbox-ose-additions: - Update to a more recent svn snapshot. The kernel module from 3.1.2 was not loadable. - Adjust

Re: Call for tester: VirtualBox 3.1.2 for FreeBSD

2010-01-09 Thread Beat Gaetzi
David Southwell wrote: Beat Gaetzi wrote: Philipp Wuensche wrote: Martin Wilke wrote: Please report any functionality which was working with previous versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build failure. Seem like the fix from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi

Re: HEADS UP: utmp.h gone. All welcome utmpx.h.

2010-01-18 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi, Boris Samorodov wrote: Hello Ed, thanks for your hard work! On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:42:54 +0100 Ed Schouten wrote: I've noticed there is some breakage in ports, but it shouldn't be too serious. Seems that emulators/virtualbox-ose is broken: Yes, there is a pr open with a patch

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

2011-03-05 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote: Hi, is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports? maybe into www/firefox-devel? Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it is the release candidate. Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our

Re: clang, dbus, firefox+thunderbird

2012-06-20 Thread Beat Gaetzi
2012/6/20 Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru: Hi All, Andrew, thanks for your time and help! 19.06.2012 21:14, Andrew W. Nosenko написал: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Boris Samorodovb...@passap.ru  wrote: Hi List, I use clang compiled world (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES and

Re: FreeBSD Port: seamonkey-2.9.1_1

2012-06-27 Thread Beat Gaetzi
2012/6/27 Marco Alberoni m.alber...@cineca.it: Hello, are there any problems for the release of the Seamonkey 2.10.1 port? Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing. Beat

Re: FreeBSD Port: seamonkey-2.9.1_1

2012-06-27 Thread Beat Gaetzi
2012/6/27 Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org: Beat Gaetzi ha scritto: Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing. Is such path available somewhere? Yes, but testing is still ongoing so use it at your own risk

Re: [HEADS-UP] CVS commit mails from ports

2012-07-18 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi Peter, 2012/7/18 Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com: Thank you for your efforts in migrating the ports repository. On 2012-Jul-16 15:22:13 +0200, Beat Gaetzi b...@freebsd.org wrote: The ports tree switched to Subversion this weekend. CVS commit mails will be turned off soon. If you like

Re: svn commit? no templates?

2012-07-23 Thread Beat Gaetzi
2012/7/23 Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org: did I break something? svn commit had no pretty blank template anymore, like cvs commit did. Make sure you have the FreeBSD specific options in the Subversion port enabled: ENHANCED_KEYWORD=on (default) Enhanced svn:keyword support

Happy Birthday FreeBSD ports

2012-08-21 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi, Today, 18 years ago the first version of Mk/bsd.port.mk was committed to CVS. From the CVS log: # cvs log -r1.1 Mk/bsd.port.mk Working file: Mk/bsd.port.mk head: 1.738 [...] description: revision 1.1 date: 1994/08/21 13:12:57; author: jkh; state: Exp; Commit my

[HEADS-UP] Announcing the end of port CVS

2012-09-07 Thread Beat Gaetzi
The development of FreeBSD ports is done in Subversion nowadays. For the sake of compatibility a Subversion to CVS exporter is in place which has some limitations. For CVSup mirroring cvsup based on Ezm3 is used which breaks regularly especially on amd64 and with Clang and becomes more and more

Re: [HEADS-UP] Announcing the end of port CVS

2012-09-07 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 09/07/12 13:18, Ivan Voras wrote: On 07/09/2012 14:36, Beat Gaetzi wrote: For those reasons by February 28th 2013 the FreeBSD ports tree will no longer be exported to CVS. Therefore ports tree updates via CVS or CVSup will no longer available after that date. All users who use CVS

Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?

2013-01-07 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 01/07/13 15:22, Mikhail T. wrote: On 07.01.2013 03:33, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: accessibility/kdeaccessibility description: Accessibility applications for KDE maintainer:po...@freebsd.org deprecated because: Depends on QT3; unmaintained expiration date:

Re: Ports cvs deprecation warning

2013-01-10 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 01/10/13 20:48, Warren Block wrote: Most recent version: Please feel free to commit your patch. Thanks, Beat Index: ports/UPDATING === --- ports/UPDATING(revision 310189) +++ ports/UPDATING(working copy) @@ -5,6