On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Counting portsnap and cvsup accesses is non-intrusive - i.e. nothing
sent from local host - will count systems from any version of
FreeBSD, but will never count everything because sites
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
But one can't rely on that. You'll definitely see more than one ip
associated with my laptop, if I move it around.
A more reliable way that I can think of is generating a unique ID
number when a system finishes installation or
- Original Message -
From: User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Xiao-Yong Jin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Gotta start somewhere ... how many of us are really out there?
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:14 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Sun's compiler and
some other
programs of theirs are serialized and when you buy them you have to
send in
the
cpu serial number to Sun who generates a key that will only allow the
compiler
to run on that system. If you move the compiler
On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:49 PM, User Freebsd wrote:
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as
most ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless
headaches ...
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I
[www.etrade.co=] [=]
[images=]
Please note that Your E*TRADE FINANCIAL account = is about to expire.
In order for it to remain active, please use the link below to proceed
and update Your Account.
[1]https://us.etr= ade.com/e/t/user/login
Thank you
E*TRADE Accounts
Tyler Spivey wrote:
Hello. I'm interested in moving my server from linux to freeBSD, but
have several questions:
2. Can Ufs handle crashes very well, or is a very long fsck needed like
the old ext2 days?
Usually fsck will run in the background after boot has finished. On very
hard crashes you
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
- Original Message - From: User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Xiao-Yong Jin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Gotta start somewhere ... how many of us are really out
there?
On Mon, 31 Jul
Having another crack at building firefox 1.5 on FreeBSD 6.0 Release...
Anyone knows what this cryptic error could be due to? Thanks in advance.
Chandan
=== Extracting for firefox-1.5.0.5,1
= Checksum OK for firefox-1.5.0.5-source.tar.bz2.
=== firefox-1.5.0.5,1 depends on file:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
suitable replacement for the card ...
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
...
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
What's the best way to ignore certain dependancies within makefiles
while running a portupgrade?
For example, I don't want to build the Galeon webbrowser everytime, but
it is present in the Gnome2 makefile.
If I delete it from the file this does not help because a cvsup restores
the original
Hi ,
Join me on WAYN so we can share our contact links, keep track of each others
whereabouts and meet over 6 million people from all around the world!
Visit
http://www.wayn.com/wayn.html?wci=registerwce=refferalm=5585859c=189702228
to start your own network today!
Regards,
Jaroonsaka
On 7/31/06, User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Counting portsnap and cvsup accesses is non-intrusive - i.e. nothing
sent from local host - will count systems from any version of
On 01 Aug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way to ignore certain dependancies within makefiles
while running a portupgrade?
For example, I don't want to build the Galeon webbrowser everytime, but
it is present in the Gnome2 makefile.
See the HOLDPKG statement in
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vortex Germany told me
the opposite wr/t to their new line of cards. They said, they
were working on full FreeBSD support. I'll check what they have
to say about the GDT
Micah writes:
I `ve got a spam problem and want to run a spamfilter.
There is only a problem i don`t no witch spamfilter to choose.
Can anyone give me a tip of a good and simple to run spamfilter???
I'm running SpamAssassin and spamass-milter. They seem to do an
okay job.
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Huff wrote:
Micah writes:
I `ve got a spam problem and want to run a spamfilter.
There is only a problem i don`t no witch spamfilter to choose.
Can anyone give me a tip of a good and simple to run spamfilter???
I'm running SpamAssassin and spamass-milter. They
What about the first question? curious too :-)
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 14:51, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Tyler Spivey wrote:
Hello. I'm interested in moving my server from linux to freeBSD, but
have several questions:
2. Can Ufs handle crashes very well, or is a very long fsck needed like
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it took almost 3 hours, i don't have X installed. i'm sending you the
portmanager.log in private coz it might clutter the thread.
You have a warning message listed here:
Tue Aug 1 04:38:03 2006
options changed so returningphp4-mbstring-4.4.2_2
On 01/08/06, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may
even want to mount it read-only for security. (I think these are good
advises on any system).
I used to agree with this (specifically the mantra was mount /usr read
only) - until I tried to patch anything! Then it's useless.
What
[please include me in replies since i'm not (yet) subscribed]
Hi there,
I just hit a little problem with the php4 port archivers/php4-zlib.
For a customer, i've set up a machine with apache and php4, which includes
php4-zlib (via the metaport php4-extensions).
Everything was running fine,
Hi,
I want to put a local DJB dnscache on each host. This is primarily to
improve reliabilty during network glitches. They will have cached most of
our local addresses and will not hang if one of their dns servers
disappears.
However, I use svscan to start up dnscache, and that starts very
Can Sar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to compile a module for 6.0-RELEASE that includes vnode.h
. Unfortunately even the simple test file below fails. It claims that
sys/vnode_if.h is missing (which upon checking is true) and seems to
be missing in general as well:
In response to Mark Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I want to put a local DJB dnscache on each host. This is primarily to
improve reliabilty during network glitches. They will have cached most of
our local addresses and will not hang if one of their dns servers
disappears.
However, I
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:44:01 -0300 (ADT)
User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me like the best solution is to boykott Adaptec like OpenBSD did.
'k, I finally got ahold of someone @ adaptec, and the official word seems
to be:
FreeBSD 6 is not officially supported for the GDT
Hi! I recently updated MySQL to version 5.0.22 using the ports
system (portupgrade -r -R mysql-\*). Previous to this, MySQL was
behaving perfectly normally. Since the upgrade, I have found that
every so often -- sometimes two or three times a day, sometimes every
other day, but no more
Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generating a unique anonymous key is easy, proving why we need it is not.
That's how we can tell the differences between server to server.
Ok, here it is, ifconfig | sha256 | md5 . 16^32 unique anonymous
keys. Every host needs to have a NIC to send
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:38 AM, William Woodhams wrote:
My first question would be what version of MySQL did you come from?
This sometimes can have an effect on queries.
Hi! My apologies for leaving this out. It was 5.0.13.
Ricky
___
Hi there,
I started to configure two firewall to work with carp+pfsync.
I got everything done and working, but it seems thant I can't make
nat on pf work properly.
Just to know: does nat on pf work fine when using carp?
Do I have to do the nat on the carp interface or on the physical
how do i make the squid, appache
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
max mapuranga wrote:
how do i make the squid, appache
What? Please clarify what you are looking to do here
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
In the last episode (Aug 01), Robert Huff said:
Micah writes:
I `ve got a spam problem and want to run a spamfilter. There is
only a problem i don`t no witch spamfilter to choose. Can anyone
give me a tip of a good and simple to run spamfilter???
I'm running SpamAssassin and
Joshua Lewis wrote:
Would I be better off just going with Gnome or KDE? I realize once I
start installing apps that I will probably wind up installing
something that uses Gnome or KDE libraries so I am going to wind up
bloating my system any ways right?
Look at them
Dan Nelson writes:
2) installing spamass-milter requires rebuilding sendmail. (I have
no idea about other MTAs.) This usually sounds more frightening than
it is, but can still lead to complications.
You shouldn't have had to rebuild sendmail; some OSes don't ship
a libmilter with
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
suitable replacement for the card ...
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
...
Official word from Adaptec is that
A quick follow up on this email ... please note that I have not, in this
email, pointed to anything but the iir(4) driver, and, more specifically,
the GDT controller card ...
I have been using Adaptec products since the early 90's, and, until
upgrading to FreeBSD 6.x, *never* had a
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vortex Germany told me
the opposite wr/t to their new line of cards. They said, they
were working on full FreeBSD support. I'll
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
Generating a unique anonymous key is easy, proving why we need it is not.
If you want to make accurate #s, you need to make sure that a host doesn't
send in multiple reports, which means you need a unique key for each host
... IP doesn't work,
Hi,
Your network layout would help in this but anyway.
The carp on the external interface should be used to the external router
know what firewall to send your incoming packets, and the carp on the
internal interface to the same thing on you LAN.
You can check with route(8) what interface is
Hello!
'k, just to clarify here ... the new products won't be based on the iir(4)
driver then?
Yes, they won't.
Basically, should the iir(4) driver be considered EOE also?
As far as Adaptec and ICP Vortex are concerned, yes. Since the
driver is Open Source, there is no enforced EOE, just
Yuan, Jue wrote:
What about the first question? curious too :-)
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/
is a good bookmark to have when you accidentially delete a post you
later want to look at.
Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org
X.509
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 7/31/06, User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Counting portsnap and cvsup accesses is non-intrusive - i.e. nothing
sent from local host
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Rico Secada wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:44:01 -0300 (ADT)
User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me like the best solution is to boykott Adaptec like OpenBSD did.
Actually, based on the thread going on on -stable right now, from ppl that
are talking to Adaptec,
Freminlins wrote:
On 01/08/06, *Erik Norgaard* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may
even want to mount it read-only for security. (I think these are good
advises on any system).
I used to agree with this (specifically the mantra was mount /usr read
User Freebsd writes:
Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but as
soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ... you'd need
to do something like:
ifconfig | grep ether | sha256 | md5
since the 'ether' would never change ...
At
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:41, Mark Powell wrote:
That means I need to replace resolv.conf early in the boot with the
addresses of remote dns caches:
...
and then in dnscache's svscan startup file I can then put it back to:
-
nameserver 127.0.0.1
The nameservers in resolv.conf are
On 01/08/06, Erik Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You usually don't patch up your system everyday. Remount rw do the
patching and remount ro. The problem is more that some 3rd party
applications assume that /usr is writeable. I found the problem more
annoying with / whenever I need to change
On 7/31/06, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: Is there a way to scan the RAID, and recover the NTFS
partition? I've Google'd, but only come up with half results claiming that
a dd script can be written, reading 64K chunks off of each drive and
rebuilding a complete image. I
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Huff wrote:
User Freebsd writes:
Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but as
soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ... you'd need
to do something like:
ifconfig | grep ether | sha256 | md5
since the 'ether'
On 7/31/06, Joseph Gleason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to reach two hosts via two interfaces that are both on
the same subnet?
...
My objective is to have a FreeBSD box balance outbound traffic between
two NICs, while being able to select from among many routers that
could be the
User Freebsd wrote:
Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but
as soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ...
you'd need to do something like:
ifconfig | grep ether | sha256 | md5
since the 'ether' would never change ...
I think you'd want
Freminlins writes:
Except for useful things like installing additional software. That is
something I do do regularly.
On my system, additional software goes under the separate
partition /usr. Or are we using different definitions of
additional?
Good morning,
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've been
watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough. But
looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes with state of piperd.
Possibly I misunderstand it's meaning. I thought that was a lack of file
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until Mark's recent series
of mails on it, no
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until
On Monday 31 July 2006 05:15, Bryan Bonifacio wrote:
Hi JC,
I suggest you have your ADSL modem changed to a
non-USB one (an ethernet one instead). Those are much
easier to configure and you could connect them
directly to your router.
I used to have a USB ADSL modem myself but had it
You turned this into a Microsoft issue. I didn't. Do you feel that the
world is closing in around you, and that it's powered by windows? You
probably surround yourself with UNIX based systems and dread the idea of
a heterogeneous computing environment.
-Original Message-
From: Ted
I'm wondering if the kernel is setup for using AX.25
stuff with freebsd.
And will I be able to use other hamradio apps I have
found in linux and be able to compile them to work in
freebsd as I usually run a hamradio gateway. (this is
why I ask).
I was going to try freebsd on my laptop first before
--- Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Joshua Lewis wrote:
Would I be better off just going with Gnome
or KDE? I realize once I
start installing apps that I will probably
wind up installing
something that uses Gnome or KDE libraries so
I am going to wind up
On 8/1/06, Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User Freebsd writes:
Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but as
soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ... you'd need
to do something like:
ifconfig | grep ether | sha256 | md5
since the
Simple question: Has anybody had any success running Windows Server
2003 in a VM on FreeBSD?
If so, which VM product did you use?
--
--
Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
--Atom Powers--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Freminlins wrote:
You made the point with reference to security, not system recovery. That
is what I am contradicting.
Security is often misunderstood to mean protecting against unauthorized
access. But this is only part of information security.
You need to protect your information assets
Hello All,
Just tried to install samba3 from ports ( yes i just updated ports
with portsnap) and i got this error:
=== samba-3.0.23,1 broken IPC and code.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba3.
*** Error code 1
Whats up with it?
Thankx.
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Second, various Adaptec sources have confirmed that they do support
FreeBSD.
There are new drivers for the 22300SLP for example (though one person
replied to me privately and said they crash all the time). However,
what they claim as support
I am installing a new server and have to copy many files from old server
to new. I have connected a windows box to each via samba, and am dragging
from one to the other via the windows box.
This might seem like a silly question, but what is the way to copy
-directly- from one fbsd box to another?
In response to David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am installing a new server and have to copy many files from old server
to new. I have connected a windows box to each via samba, and am dragging
from one to the other via the windows box.
This might seem like a silly question, but what is
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 14:04, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am installing a new server and have to copy many files from old server
to new. I have connected a windows box to each via samba, and am dragging
from one to the other via the windows box.
On 7/29/06, Igor Robul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, IgorAll.
On 7/10/06, Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly I asked chipest HARDWARE raid MB doesn't has contained
hardware
Why dont you wish use geom_mirror if 3Ware card is expensive for you?
Because I hoped buy (at least not
I ran into the same problem when I was installing it, and I found this
answer:
You need to run 'make config' and uncheck AIO and SMBSH options. They
are broken at the moment and, possibly, won't even compile.
Alternatively, you can just run 'make rmconfig' and compile port with
the
On 01/08/06, Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my system, additional software goes under the separate
partition /usr. Or are we using different definitions of
additional?
/usr includes a large part of the base installation. /usr/local is the usual
place for additional
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:24:18AM -0700, Harold Hartley wrote:
I'm wondering if the kernel is setup for using AX.25
stuff with freebsd.
No. With good reason that its not there. The best reason is, It doesn't
need to be in the kernel. At typical 1200 bits/sec, to less common
9600, to the exotic
I'm writing some monitoring scripts, and I'm having some trouble because
the TCP seems to wait 90 seconds before giving up on initiating a
connection.
(The script is in PHP, testing a PostgreSQL database. Neither PHP nor
libpq (which PHP's PostgreSQL support is based on) seem to have any
On 01/08/06, Erik Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you configure your server using LDAP or NIS for user management then
you only need to mount the root file system rw when updating the base
system or changing root password. Add the MAC and you will likely be
able to protect further against
This is why the snmp protocol uses UDP, Bill.
You need to use something other than TCP for
monitoring.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Reducing the timeout on a TCP connection
I'm
In response to Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is why the snmp protocol uses UDP, Bill.
You need to use something other than TCP for
monitoring.
Well ... if I'm monitoring a server that uses TCP (PostgreSQL) I can't
rightly establish whether or not it's successfully accepting
Hi,
I've a freeBSD box and I've been seeing this
message for several months: sis0 watchdog
timeout.
The box has two ethernet cards, sis0 (100mb) and
vr0 (10mb).
The messages isn't frequent but yesterday it got
my attention. What does this mean?
Thanks...
Efren Bravo.
-
Fight back
Gerard wrote:
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it took almost 3 hours, i don't have X installed. i'm sending you the
portmanager.log in private coz it might clutter the thread.
You have a warning message listed here:
Tue Aug 1 04:38:03 2006
options changed so returning
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 12:20, Robert Huff wrote:
1) spamd (part of SpamAssassin) is written in perl. This is
fine for a workstation, not so much for a high-volume mail server.
Although it is used in high-volume mail services like fastmail.fm,
tuffmail.com etc
Why not just add in the patch in kern/65627 and run the CPU serial number
through
your hash?
Ted
- Original Message -
From: User Freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Xiao-Yong Jin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
I'm writing some monitoring scripts, and I'm having some trouble because
the TCP seems to wait 90 seconds before giving up on initiating a
connection.
(The script is in PHP, testing a PostgreSQL database. Neither PHP nor
libpq (which PHP's PostgreSQL support is based on) seem to have any
- Original Message -
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Reducing the timeout on a TCP connection
In response to Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is why the snmp protocol uses UDP, Bill.
You need
On 8/1/06, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just add in the patch in kern/65627 and run the CPU serial number
through
your hash?
Because you can still fake the dam thing, making the whole idea
useless!!! Am I the only one that can see this ... what the hell
people! I just
i remember a thread from a few weeks back, that i followed closely, but
was never able to resolve my issue as the original poster did. i have a
6.1-STABLE system that the bulk of my mans to not work, but some that are
recently installed from ports are working. can someone guide me thru
trouble
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I wanted to ask if there is some sort of channel whereby he could be
given active support
See a need, fill a need. Since you can clearly see the person wasn't given
adequate information, then go ahead and give him the information. Unless
people like you and me and the
Similar to top on Linux ?
e.g.:
13:33:24 up 174 days, 10:35, 1 user, load average: 7.32, 7.20, 7.13
216 processes: 208 sleeping, 8 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpuusernice systemirq softirq iowaitidle
total 98.1%0.0%1.4% 0.0% 0.3%
In the last episode (Aug 01), DAve said:
We are in the process of getting a good hammering of spam. I've been
watching my mail gateways and they are keeping up well enough. But
looking at top I am seeing a lot of processes with state of piperd.
Piperd means the process is waiting on a read
FreeBSD 6.1
The printer on my system is connected to a WinXP machine. I installed
apsfilter to configure the print setup. Everything appears to be working
and I can print to the printer from within apsfilter.
However, when I attempt to print either from the command line or from
within KDE,
In the last episode (Aug 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is why the snmp protocol uses UDP, Bill.
You need to use something other than TCP for
monitoring.
Well ... if I'm monitoring a server that uses TCP (PostgreSQL) I
can't rightly
In response to Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm writing some monitoring scripts, and I'm having some trouble because
the TCP seems to wait 90 seconds before giving up on initiating a
connection.
(The script is in PHP, testing a PostgreSQL database. Neither PHP nor
libpq (which
For a variety of reasons (long, hard to explain) I need a static python
binary - with no external libraries.
I know how to do this from source. However, I would like to install from
the ports tree - what line can I run inside of /usr/ports/lang/python to
get a totally static, standalone python
Gerard Seibert wrote:
FreeBSD 6.1
The printer on my system is connected to a WinXP machine. I installed
apsfilter to configure the print setup. Everything appears to be working
and I can print to the printer from within apsfilter.
However, when I attempt to print either from the command
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:41, Atom Powers wrote:
Simple question: Has anybody had any success running Windows Server
2003 in a VM on FreeBSD?
If so, which VM product did you use?
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition run under QEMU 0.8.1 fine. (FreeBSD
6.1-STABLE)
--
Best regards,
Simon
--- Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've a freeBSD box and I've been seeing this
message for several months: sis0 watchdog
timeout.
The box has two ethernet cards, sis0 (100mb) and
vr0 (10mb).
The messages isn't frequent but yesterday it got
my attention. What
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
It seems to be when a port presents the blue Options screen. If you
change anything (maybe even when you don't, not sure) portmanager gives
that message. Unless there are other problems it seems to get back round
to updating the port later in the run.
Interesting!
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:10 am, Joseph Gleason wrote:
Is it possible to reach two hosts via two interfaces that are
both on the same subnet?
Example:
em0: 172.20.0.1/16
em1: 172.20.0.2/16
And I want to reach 172.20.0.3 via em0 and 172.20.0.4 via em1.
From 'netstat -nr' I see a line like
I'm having problems trying to get X11 to forward from an ezjail created
jail environment. Here's what happens:
trisha% ssh -X 10.0.0.1
...
test% xclock
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
X connection to test:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
I added
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:39, Efren Bravo wrote:
Hi,
I've a freeBSD box and I've been seeing this
message for several months: sis0 watchdog
timeout.
The box has two ethernet cards, sis0 (100mb) and
vr0 (10mb).
The messages isn't frequent but yesterday it got
my attention. What does
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:39, Efren Bravo wrote:
Hi,
I've a freeBSD box and I've been seeing this
message for several months: sis0 watchdog
timeout.
The box has two ethernet cards, sis0 (100mb) and
vr0 (10mb).
The messages isn't frequent but
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
