-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
It might be nice to have freebsd-update update this portion of the
kernel even if thats the only part thats updated.
What me bugs most is that if you do make installworld, freebsd-update
What me bugs most is that if you do make installworld, freebsd-update
still wants to update everything.
Oh, why does it do that? freebsd-update maintains a separate database or
something of what's to be updated and not?
Regards,
Rakhesh
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
What me bugs most is that if you do make installworld, freebsd-update
still wants to update everything.
Oh, why does it do that? freebsd-update maintains a separate database or
something of what's to be updated and
(This SAN-stuff is one of my weak subjects, so please excuse me if I use the
wrong terms. If there is a better list to ask this question, please tell me.)
HW: ProLiant DL380 G4
OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7
FC-card:
isp0: Qlogic ISP 2312 PCI FC-AL Adapter port 0x5000-0x50ff mem
Hello,
Is the following audio '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' supported
on FreeBSD6.2?
If so, which device do I need to load in the kernel or how can I get it to work.
Many thanks,
Alain
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I've partitioned my HD into 3 partitions.
One is currently running FreeBSD6.2, the second has my data files (home
directories).
On the third I would like to install FreeBSD-current to play around a bit and
get more familiar
with the OS.
Is it possible after the installation of current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Is it possible after the installation of current on the 3rd partition that I
can use my data files
(home directories) without messing up the permissions/etc?
As long as the UIDs are the same it should work.
Peter
- --
is that this wrong or controler has problems?
ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA48 retrying (1 retry left) LBA=434853328
ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51READY,DSC,ERROR
error=10NID_NOT_FOUND LBA=434853328
GEOM_ELI: Crypto WRITE request failed (error=5).
ad4d.eli[WRITE(offset=220033572864,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Ingeborg Hellemo wrote:
(This SAN-stuff is one of my weak subjects, so please excuse me if I use the
wrong terms. If there is a better list to ask this question, please tell me.)
HW: ProLiant DL380 G4
OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7
FC-card:
isp0: Qlogic ISP 2312 PCI FC-AL
Dear list,
There is a problem with performing a dump from our webserver at the data
centre to a backup machine at the office. Everytime we try to perform a dump,
the SSH tunnel dies:
# /sbin/dump -0uan -L -h 0 -f - / | /usr/bin/bzip2 | /usr/bin/ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \
dd
Peter Boosten wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
What me bugs most is that if you do make installworld, freebsd-update
still wants to update everything.
Oh, why does it do that? freebsd-update maintains a separate database or
something of
Peter Boosten wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Is it possible after the installation of current on the 3rd partition that I
can use my data files
(home directories) without messing up the permissions/etc?
As long as the UIDs are the same it
On Thursday 09 August 2007 11:25, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
Dear list,
There is a problem with performing a dump from our webserver at the data
centre to a backup machine at the office. Everytime we try to perform a
dump, the SSH tunnel dies:
# /sbin/dump -0uan -L -h 0 -f - / |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:08:02AM +0200, Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Ingeborg Hellemo wrote:
(This SAN-stuff is one of my weak subjects, so please excuse me if I use
the
wrong terms. If there is a better list to ask this question, please tell
me.)
HW: ProLiant DL380 G4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
Dear list,
There is a problem with performing a dump from our webserver at the data
centre to a backup machine at the office. Everytime we try to perform a dump,
the SSH tunnel dies:
[snip]
* The client (where the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does your SATAbeast have a LUN exported to your host?
Yes, and we have also experimented with different sizes and different
LUN-numbers ( 16, 16). The Beast can see the card on the host.
A point perhaps worth mentioning is that there exists a SAN-switch between the
Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I need to see an overwhelming
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
do not switch to freebsd. use windows if you have to be convinced.
switch when you
I am a new arrival to *BSD though I have used Linux for ten years. I think
that if you want a working system right off the bat, PC-BSD or DesktopBSD
would be a better introduction for you.
The most windows-like system (of which are you talking about) is windows.
just keep with it
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:57:36AM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
I've partitioned my HD into 3 partitions.
One is currently running FreeBSD6.2, the second has my data files (home
directories).
On the third I would like to install FreeBSD-current to play around a
bit and get more
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:25:41AM +0200, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
Dear list,
There is a problem with performing a dump from our webserver at the data
centre to a backup machine at the office. Everytime we try to perform a dump,
the SSH tunnel dies:
# /sbin/dump -0uan -L -h 0 -f - / |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In such a case I'd try to boot the system using Knoppix or any other Linux
system. Maybe this will give you some additional diagnostics which helps to
make progress with FreeBSD. On the other hand, if Linux doesn't see the disk
too, you'd have to look closer to your
In response to Latitude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I
Local system status:
3:01AM up 521 days, 19:57, 0 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.05, 0.02
(FreeBSD 4.4)
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: Wojciech Puchar
To: Pollywog
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Convince me,
Latitude [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be.
It's up to you to figure out if you like it or not. If you install it and
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:11:19AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:57:36AM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
I've partitioned my HD into 3 partitions.
One is currently running FreeBSD6.2, the second has my data files (home
directories).
On the third
a perfectly acceptable alternative for home desktop users who have previously
known only Windows. It's not, and it never will be.
never say never, but i wish too it will never be.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I need to see an overwhelming
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows,
Why?
but I'll have to say, you guys don't really present a forceful
argument to Windows users of how easy the switch may be.
FreeBSD finds users by being a quality operating system, not by trying
Op donderdag 09 augustus 2007, schreef u:
Try using a much lower MTU, something like 1400 or perhaps lower,
just for testing. You should configure this, on both client and server.
I'm not familiar with ipf to give the exact rule, but I would allow
ALL ICMP traffic, at least for testing
On Thursday 09 August 2007 16:43, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
Op donderdag 09 augustus 2007, schreef u:
Try using a much lower MTU, something like 1400 or perhaps lower,
just for testing. You should configure this, on both client and
server.
I'm not familiar with ipf to give the exact
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:22:26PM -0500, Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD
jargon the second I get to your
Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I need to see an overwhelming
Latitude wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll
have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD
jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I need to see an overwhelming
On Thursday 09 August 2007 09:50, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
Is the following audio '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio'
supported on FreeBSD6.2?
It's merged to RELENG_6 also known as FreeBSD-STABLE.
test message
--
Jean-Pierre Trophardy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
--
Jean-Pierre Trophardy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 at 15:47 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
test message
--
Jean-Pierre Trophardy
___
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Keep in mind that dump(8) uses UFS2 snapshots. I don't know
the current status, but in the past, snapshots were not working
that good.
This statement is far too general and IMHO does a disservice to those
who worked on snapshots.
There were (and maybe even are, but
Latitude wrote:
but I'll have to say, you guys don't really present a forceful
argument to Windows users of how easy the switch may be.
I suggest you not change from Windows to BSD. It looks like you're best
off with an operating system that requires little to no input on your
part to set
I'm one of subscribers of FreeBSD mailing lists and I saw your announce at
one of these lists about your online book. You have made a magnific work and
despite of being a linux user for nearly ten years I decided to use FBSD
too. The system is well documented and I've learned to love it. Thanks to
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you guest it was just for test message sending to THIS ONE.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Jean-Pierre Trophardy
There is a lot to your question that you may not realize. I think before
answering your question, a brief discussion of computers is appropriate.
A computer is a phenomenally complex system of parts. If you go to the
website of a major Motherboard manufacturer, you will see a huge list of
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 at 15:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe to
it and use it for test message sending.
Don't even need to subscribe:-)
You can view the archives at
Duane Hill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages.
Subscribe to it and use it for test message sending.
Don't even need to subscribe:-)
You can view the archives at
http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/freebsd-test.html or
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a perfectly acceptable alternative for home desktop users who have
previously known only Windows. It's not, and it never will be.
never say never, but i wish too it will never be.
Please note that the
In response to Jean-Pierre Trophardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you guest it was just for test message sending to THIS ONE.
Sorry for the
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 at 16:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you guest it was just for test message sending to THIS ONE.
Sorry for the
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:02:55 pm Bob Middaugh wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but
I'll have to say, you guys don't really present a forceful
argument to Windows users of how easy the switch may be.
Simple, Use a live CD. RoFreesbie, Knoppix, Ubuntu, and
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Hi all,
this is probably a silly question but... how do I change mount options
to get atime back (after setting 'noatime') on mounted filesystem?
I can't see option 'atime' in mount(8) but there's no 'suid' either.
Here's what I'm trying to do:
# mount | grep
Op donderdag 09 augustus 2007, schreef Alex Zbyslaw:
Hello,
Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
# /sbin/dump -0uan -L -h 0 -f - / | /usr/bin/bzip2 | /usr/bin/ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \
dd of=/backup/webserver/root.0.bz2
bzip2 is darned slow and not always much better than gzip -9. It might
be
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:22:51 -0400
Mark Moellering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows does an excellent job of running on almost any hardware.
(how well it runs is up for debate)
FreeBSD is also pretty good at running on just about any hardware,
however, you may need to do some file
I don't know that such a claim is ever made from within FreeBSD. FreeBSD
is Unix, for and by those who know and love Unix. Linux is the one
that's wwhy i switched from linux to NetBSD then FreeBSD few years ago.
wanting to be a better Windows than Windows.
and getting worse windows actually
Windows does an excellent job of running on almost any hardware. (how well it
runs is up for debate)
because hardware manufacturers make drivers. only because of that.
very little drivers was coded by microsoft by itself, contrary to FreeBSD
which has LOTS of drivers included.
and running
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Jean-Pierre Trophardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text and
graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config, there are
plenty of nice other wm's good for
argument to Windows users of how easy the switch may be.
Simple, Use a live CD. RoFreesbie, Knoppix, Ubuntu, and several
knoppix DVD is very nice. it's actually useful with not very modern (damn
cheap) computer without hard disk+pendrive or with very small hard disk.
excellent for
I deeply disagree here. Any comparison between FreeBSD and window$ in
that field is bogus. What an excellent job is windows$ doing?
washes hundreds millions of brains, to produce constant wide enough stream
of cash to microsoft
___
--On August 8, 2007 11:22:26 PM -0500 Latitude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second
It's already been mentioned, but I would strongly recommend PCBSD for
the windows convert. Having PCBSD allows me to easily setup friends
and family with systems that function more like they're used while
maintaining all FreeBSD funtionality including the ports tree, blessed
be the FreeBSD
On 8/9/07, Latitude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but I'll have
to say, you guys don't really present a forceful argument to Windows
users of how easy the switch may be. I get knee-deep in FreeBSD jargon
the second I get to your webpage. I
Written by Wojciech Puchar on 08/09/07 12:04
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text and
graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
Brian Astill wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:02:55 pm Bob Middaugh wrote:
I'm interested in changing over to FreeBSD from Windows, but
I'll have to say, you guys don't really present a forceful
argument to Windows users of how easy the switch may be.
The switch will not be particularly easy.
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:04:50 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
a very little unix (few tools and kernel) + lots of bulky overhead ...
Try it, you will find otherwise. The user interface works without
hassle. MacOS X comes with more
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:15:08 -0500
Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She
saw my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know
why i was using such an old computer. [...] Granted, it could be
only because
Written by David Kelly on 08/09/07 12:30
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
a very little unix (few tools and kernel) + lots of bulky overhead ...
Try it, you will find otherwise. The user interface works
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:33:20PM -0500, Reid Linnemann wrote:
Written by David Kelly on 08/09/07 12:30
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
a very little unix (few tools and kernel) + lots of bulky overhead ...
This message has been sent to you as the final step to confirm your
email list subscription for the following list:
Digital Dance (CT3)
To confirm this subscription, please follow the URL below:
http://ns.donmailer.co.uk/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/n/dd1/freebsd-questions/freebsd.org/8855906/
The subscription of the email address:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
to the mailing list:
Digital Dance (CT3)
is complete. Thanks for subscribing!
Please save this email message for future reference.
I'm one of subscribers of FreeBSD mailing lists and I saw your announce at
one of these lists about your online book. You have made a magnific work and
despite of being a linux user for nearly ten years I decided to use FBSD
too. The system is well documented and I've learned to love it.
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
Is the following audio '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio' supported
on FreeBSD6.2?
If so, which device do I need to load in the kernel or how can I get it to
work.
Many thanks,
Alain
___
This message has been sent to you as the final step to confirm your
email *removal* for the following list:
Digital Dance (CT3)
To confirm this unsubscription, please follow the URL below:
http://ns.donmailer.co.uk/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/dd1/freebsd-questions/freebsd.org/8855906/
(Click the
The removal of the email address:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
from the mailing list:
Digital Dance (CT3)
is complete.
You may wish to save this email message for future reference.
---
Date of
Reid Linnemann wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She saw
my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know why i
was using such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of the user
interface ingrained as a measure of the capabilities of
Written by David Kelly on 08/09/07 12:56
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:33:20PM -0500, Reid Linnemann wrote:
Written by David Kelly on 08/09/07 12:30
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
a very little unix (few
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She saw
my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know why i
was using such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of the user
interface
running FreeBSD 6.2 Stable
we have openLDAP installed on a server called access1. Users on access1
appear to not be able to ssh to access1. The ssh authentication method
uses PAM ldap. PAM_ldap reports Invalid credentials in /var/log/messages
We have another server called access2 that
Hi, i have installed postfix + sasl2 support, so far so good but now i
want to enable mysql auth and sasl2 was not compiled with mysql support,
i tried desinstalling it but it claims postfix depends on it, so how do
i add mysql support to the installed sasl2 port?
Im using portinstall btw,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/9/07, Noah wrote:
running FreeBSD 6.2 Stable
we have openLDAP installed on a server called access1. Users on access1
appear to not be able to ssh to access1. The ssh authentication method
uses PAM ldap. PAM_ldap reports Invalid
How do I make install clean a port in the background? I used
cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
make install clean
it returns the pid but then compiles in the foreground
What am I doing wrong?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Written by Sean Murphy on 08/09/07 15:15
How do I make install clean a port in the background? I used
cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
make install clean
it returns the pid but then compiles in the foreground
What am I doing wrong?
___
It sure seems that this should be simple, but my searches have only turned up
inter-active hex/disk editors. I'm probably asking wrong.
I have a large binary file (700 meg) and I know that there is a single wrong
byte. I also know it's exact location in the file.
Is there a command-line
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:57:46 -0600
Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i have installed postfix + sasl2 support, so far so good but now
i want to enable mysql auth and sasl2 was not compiled with mysql
support, i tried desinstalling it but it claims postfix depends on
it, so how do i add
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:57:46PM -0600, Miguel wrote:
Hi, i have installed postfix + sasl2 support, so far so good but now i
want to enable mysql auth and sasl2 was not compiled with mysql support,
i tried desinstalling it but it claims postfix depends on it, so how do
i add mysql support
I'm not sure where this message is better directed, to either the port
maintainer or the questions list. The answer is probably the ports
list.. [Crossposted]
There are two packages that are indicated as installed, py24-dbus and
py25-dbus. Both of these look like identical packages, same
In response to Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Written by Sean Murphy on 08/09/07 15:15
How do I make install clean a port in the background? I used
cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
make install clean
it returns the pid but then compiles in the foreground
What am I doing wrong?
Hi:
I recently purchased a new HP dv9500t laptop. Unfortunately, the
Intel 4965AGN wireless card it came with isn't supported (yet). I
tried to use ndisgen, but it caused a panic (both 6.2 and
7.0-current).
Since I'd like to continue using FreeBSD as my desktop (laptop) OS,
and need wireless
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:15:12PM -0700, Sean Murphy wrote:
How do I make install clean a port in the background? I used
cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
make install clean
It is in the background, but if there is output from the process,
you will see it.
A solution could be make install clean
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:34:47PM -0500, Reid Linnemann wrote:
Written by David Kelly on 08/09/07 12:56
What standard utility in FreeBSD didn't start somewhere outside of
BSD?
I'm not talking about origins, I'm talking about maintainers. The
software you've listed are maintained by third
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:25:17 +
V.I.Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sure seems that this should be simple, but my searches have only
turned up inter-active hex/disk editors. I'm probably asking wrong.
I have a large binary file (700 meg) and I know that there is a
single wrong byte.
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:22:08 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:12:22 -0700
David Benfell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would really like the open link function to work under
gnome-terminal. But I can't find any relevant configuration
and a Google search comes up empty.
Hello Some Person who may Be Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Latitude
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:22 PM
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Convince me, please!
I'm interested in changing over
This message has been sent to you as the final step to confirm your
email list subscription for the following list:
Digital Dance (CT3)
To confirm this subscription, please follow the URL below:
http://ns.donmailer.co.uk/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/n/dd1/freebsd-questions/freebsd.org/8855906/
I am getting CDR files form another department (and they dont know how
or dont want to export as .ps).
I just need to open them to show my boss and give oks about the work
they doing.
Do you know any software in the port collection or somewhere else that
can open these files or at least export
*XnView* http://perso.orange.fr/pierre.g/xnview/enxnview.html
http://perso.orange.fr/pierre.g/xnview/enhome.html
I hope it helps...
Thanks
Hakan
http://primoris.com
On 8/9/07, Damian Vicino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting CDR files form another department (and they dont know how
or
On Thursday 09 August 2007 15:31:01 Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Written by Sean Murphy on 08/09/07 15:15
How do I make install clean a port in the background? I used
cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
make install clean
it returns the pid but
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 22:00, you wrote:
use some FAST WM without unneeded things (eg. icewm) just to run your
music program.
Point taken !
please show me dmesg lines about your disk and controller, when running
with DMA.
possibly IDE driver needs patching.
The attached IDE.txt
see below
Andy Harrison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/9/07, Noah wrote:
running FreeBSD 6.2 Stable
we have openLDAP installed on a server called access1. Users on access1
appear to not be able to ssh to access1. The ssh authentication method
uses PAM ldap.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:30:32PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
a very little unix (few tools and kernel) + lots of bulky overhead ...
Try it, you will find otherwise.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
