How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25504647.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet?
Hummm, subnet is virtual, it is not physical.
To have interface on different phisical network, plug your interfaces
to different switchwes that are not interconnected one to the other.
To have a different subnet used on
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:35:55AM -0700, David Newman wrote:
On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote:
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386
Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the
patch error pasted below.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Roland, perhaps you also know the origin of this gnuplot warning:
Could not find/open font when opening font arial,
using internal non-scalable font
I have a FreeBSD 7.0 gateway/server with isc-dhcpd 3.1.2p1_2. Late
yesterday I began having some unique and intermittent issues.
Basically, random computers will all of a sudden lose their dhcp
leases and be unable to contact the dhcp server.
At first I figured the dhcp server had crashed,
Hi All,
I was sent this by a friend, could someone confirm if this exploit is
really existant?
http://www.vimeo.com/6580991 (requires flash)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
look for this subject on the maillist reporter on deadline seeks
comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD
You will find an almost 50 chained... topic about this...
;o)
btw, yes, it does.
2009/9/18 Alex R a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net:
Hi All,
I was sent this by a friend, could someone
What does it look like?
ISP---Hub---My Gateway---Switch--Pc
Or
ISPMy Gateway---Switch-Hub-Pc
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25507235.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In the beginning when gateway starts the web page opens, but after that no
one web doesn't open. The same is in first 5min ping reach my ISP gateway,
but then it's gone. Same from my gateway with ping.
--
View this message in context:
Freeco wrote:
What does it look like?
ISP---Hub---My Gateway---Switch--Pc
Or
ISPMy Gateway---Switch-Hub-Pc
...are you sure that by accident that you don't have the following
*physical* setup?
---
| Gateway |
---
|
Mak Kolybabi wrote:
On 2009-09-14 12:12, Dan Goodin wrote:
We'll be writing a brief article about this.
I didn't notice anyone link the finished article yet, so here it is:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/14/freebsd_security_bug/
--
Matthew Anthony Kolybabi (Mak)
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[ snip ]
Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet
would be:
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
http://www.vimeo.com/6580991
The article says that Versions 7.1 and and beyond are not
vulnerable. That video contradicts that.
As someone who has manipulated moving picture for fun and profit,
having a video of something is a proof of nothing. For all what it's
worth the OS in video might
So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway?
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
|_pc
Why all pc's can't be in one subnet?
James Butler wrote: [regarding USB booting problems]
Test the fix when it arrives? Scott seems to have some idea what the
problem is, and a lot of people have been bitten by it, so I'm hoping
for a fix soon(TM).
Ok, I'll just wait for this then. :-)
Do mmc(4)/sdhci(4) not support the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Robert Huff typed:
Ruben de Groot writes:
However: using these I still can't get through
Through to what? You seem to be able to connect on a local subnet, but
not to the internet through NAT, which you say is ok, because you
Freeco wrote:
So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway?
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
|_pc
Why all pc's can't be in
I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update
it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's
packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of
the system correct in that all I have to do is:
1. Copy /usr/src and /usr/ports to the new
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[ snip ]
Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet
would be:
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
Steve Bertrand wrote:
map fxp0 192.168.0.0/24 - 0/32
Aside from that, are you sure that this entry shouldn't be:
map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 - 0/32
? Again, I don't know ipnat, but to me, in the fxp0 entry, it looks like
you are trying to map the 192 space coming INTO fxp0 (which in your
Freeco wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
|-pc
|
ISP-Switch---Gateway--Switchpc
| \ |
| \ |_pc
| \
server1 server2
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update
it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's
packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of
the
Hello
I am contacting you on behalf of a client printer accessories website,
http://www.abacus24-7.com/ I'm interested in purchasing a link from
your great site. I noticed you were running Ads so I thought you might
be interested. I'm not looking for a banner or anything flashy. In fact,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:14:59AM -0500, Andrew Gould wrote:
I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update
it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's
packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of
the system correct in that
A 'subnet' is a term used to describe a portion of an IP address space,
where each device in that space can communicate with one another without
using a router:
Steve wrote:
192.168.1.0/24 is a subnet, so hosts 192.168.1.1 through 192.168.1.254
can 'speak' to each other without using a router.
Freeco wrote:
Steve wrote:
In the diagram above, you need two NICs in the gateway. One goes to the
ISP, and the other 192.168.1.2 goes to the switch. The rest of the
computers also plug into the switch. If all of the devices have
192.168.1.x, they are all in the same subnet.
If the 2 pc's
Ok. Lets start with the basics.
- What is connected to the switch in your room?
There is connected ISP cable from my home switch and 3 pc's
- what is connected to the switch in your home?
I'm not sure, but i think there is connected a cable to my switch ( i plan:
my gateway - switch)
And my
Hi folks, I don't know how to enable ldap for php5 on my Freebsd 7.2 system
this is a client only ldap system.
ldapsearch works well with tls on it.
but I try to enable roundcube ldap, and roundcube says:
LDAP Error: No ldap support in this installation of PHP (GET
Don't top-post, please.
Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@googlemail.com writes:
for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is
pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D
# pkg_info | grep virtualbox
virtualbox-3.0.51.r6 A general-purpose full virtualizer for
fxp0 is integrated NIC. In this NIC connects a cable from ISP. rl0 is PCI NIC
the cable connets to switch with all other 3 pc's.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510880.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In response to FreeBSD admin alligator...@free.fr:
Hi folks, I don't know how to enable ldap for php5 on my Freebsd 7.2 system
this is a client only ldap system.
ldapsearch works well with tls on it.
but I try to enable roundcube ldap, and roundcube says:
LDAP Error: No ldap support
Freeco wrote:
- What is connected to the switch in your room?
There is connected ISP cable from my home switch and 3 pc's
So, like this:
down the street
|
|
home switch---neighbor
|
|
cable
make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im
not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct
link... as which or whereis doesnt give me any output pointing to
VirtualBox so in consequence im not able to launch the app
post-installation...
Can u maybe paste
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo
jeronimocal...@googlemail.com wrote:
make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im
not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct
link... as which or whereis doesnt give me any output pointing to
SOLVED!
i had an incorrect php.ini in front of my apache installation. You put me on
the right tracks!
problem solved.
no I have a TLS negociation error, but this is another part.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PHP5-and-ldap-tp22183625p25511444.html
Sent from
no, I did not, the only change i made was VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0, on
Config.kmk, before compiling...
2009/9/18 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo
jeronimocal...@googlemail.com wrote:
make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing
and now it working...
tls_ssf=256 ssf=256
great thanks for php.ini trick!
@+
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PHP5-and-ldap-tp22183625p25511620.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Thanks man!
Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this
there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. But i want
my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and
inet will doesn't work again?
I could ping all IP's when
Freeco wrote:
Thanks man!
Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this
there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short.
I kind of figured something along those lines.
But i want
my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2
Freeco wrote:
Thanks man!
Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this
there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. But i want
my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and
inet will doesn't work again?
I
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jeronimo Calvo
jeronimocal...@googlemail.com wrote:
no, I did not, the only change i made was VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0, on
Config.kmk, before compiling...
2009/9/18 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo
hi,
is /etc/X11 in /etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist still necessary? using
/usr/local/etc/X11/ seems like a much better place to store one's
xorg.conf.
cheers.
alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll
get with my ipf and nat rules.
What ports u recomend to keep open and how to block gateway ping?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25512314.html
Sent from the
Freeco wrote:
Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll
get with my ipf and nat rules.
I'm glad I could help. So many people here and on other lists have
helped me significantly over the years, so I try to give back whenever I
can/have time.
What ports u
After some time, when all 3 pc's was connected to switch inet lost. I
couldn't open any web page. I didn;t try to ping anything.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513318.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
My gateway gave me a message: gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513518.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Freeco wrote:
My gateway gave me a message: gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
That MAC address is that of a Mikrotic router.
I suspect that you've created a cabling loop of some sort again.
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Reko Turja pisze:
As someone who has manipulated moving picture for fun and profit, having
a video of something is a proof of nothing. For all what it's worth the
OS in video might be FreeBSD - or even loonix made to look like FreeBSD,
made vulnerable on purpose of tarring the project.
Phusion wrote:
I need some help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization
to a smart host being the ISP's mail server. I'm running 7.2-RELEASE.
I've looked over
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html but
want to use the built-in sendmail. I've run the
Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are
relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all
affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an
advisory through the usual
Hello,
I am at my wits end with this one. I have set up a box to use
of firewall/nat. However, during the setup I pointed set net to do a port
redirect of port 6502 to port 80 of my development web server. Everything
worked fine so I deployed my new box onto a live IP and tested it
Scott Elgram wrote:
Hello,
I am at my wits end with this one. I have set up a box to use
of firewall/nat. However, during the setup I pointed set net to do a port
redirect of port 6502 to port 80 of my development web server. Everything
worked fine so I deployed my new box
No worries, all. I've managed to get this to work, and have a working
internal freebsd-update server.
With some help from Colin, I've realized a couple of things that needed to
be changed for my setup to work. In regards to the amd64 build I was doing,
it was missing some kernel sources that
Thanks Roland,
smartctl showed disk to be fine!
fls requires a disk image, is there one created by default in FreeBSD 6.0 .
SYNOPSIS
fls [-adDFlpruvV] [-m mnt ] [-z zone ] [-f fstype ] [-s seconds ]
[-i
imgtype ] [-o imgoffset ] image [images] [ inode ]
Running fls in
54 matches
Mail list logo
