authdaemond issues / breakage after upgrade to 8.0

2009-12-02 Thread Corey Chandler
I recently upgraded from FreeBSD 7.2 to 8.0. This resulted in a strange error with authdaemond (part of the Courier imap package, used to authenticate users) when used in conjunction with postfix; I've rebuilt all of the packages, but the config they're using has worked since the 6.0 days.

Re: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out...

2009-12-02 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sunday 29 November 2009 22:47:56 Kurt Buff wrote: I've gotten Flash and Java going with Firefox, as root, using the directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html However, I can't get it going as a standard user. When I run

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:15:11 -0800, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org a écrit : it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred way of cleaning out the old stuff.. You should use pkg_delete to remove an installed

binary upgrade 6.2

2009-12-02 Thread Alex Huth
Hi! I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r 6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not find the package for it. Thx Alex

Re: authdaemond issues / breakage after upgrade to 8.0

2009-12-02 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:38:23 -0800 Corey Chandler li...@sequestered.net replied: I recently upgraded from FreeBSD 7.2 to 8.0. This resulted in a strange error with authdaemond (part of the Courier imap package, used to authenticate users) when used in conjunction with postfix; I've rebuilt all

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:01:50 +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote: Le Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:15:11 -0800, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org a écrit : it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the

Re: Why there are so many binary packages missing?

2009-12-02 Thread Polytropon
Allow me an addition, primarily involving your item #1, licensing restriction, extended to possible legal restrictions: Some ports, especially from the multimedia category, allow many build-time options that determine what to include in the final program, mostly used for codecs and file formats.

RE: binary upgrade 6.2

2009-12-02 Thread David Rawling
Alex Huth wrote: I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r 6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not find the package for it. Might it be possible to

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Randi Harper ra...@freebsd.org wrote: I'm going to just reply to all of these at once. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM,

Re: binary upgrade 6.2

2009-12-02 Thread Alex Huth
* David Rawling schrieb: Alex Huth wrote: Might it be possible to install the csup port from /usr/ports/net and use that instead of cvsup? IIRC it's compatible with cvsup and uses the same config, but does not require M3 etc. Thx csup was the solution. I should remember it, but it's a

Re: binary upgrade 6.2

2009-12-02 Thread Manolis Kiagias
Alex Huth wrote: Hi! I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r 6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not find the package for it. Thx Alex

OpenBGPD compilation problem

2009-12-02 Thread freebsd
Hi Guys, I can't seem to get OpenBGPD to compile properly on 7.0. I updated the ports to the latest version using portsnap and when I do a make install I get the following: cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe  -Wall -I/usr/ports/net/openbgpd/work/bgpd

Machine running ipf block TCP connections

2009-12-02 Thread Asrai khn
I have configured IPF based firewall on solaris 10, however for some reason which i do not understand the machine block all TCP connections after few hours of deploying the firewall rules. while blocked machine is not ping able nor I can SSH it, consequently i have to access it via console and

Re: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out...

2009-12-02 Thread Kurt Buff
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 01:16, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: On Sunday 29 November 2009 22:47:56 Kurt Buff wrote: I've gotten Flash and Java going with Firefox, as root, using the directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html

Re: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out...

2009-12-02 Thread Samuel Martín Moro
I had this problem too. I didn't have browser_plugins/ into /usr/local/lib, so I linked it to /usr/local/lib/firefox3/plugins/ I don't remember exactly, but I think this would work Also, my user is not a member of wheel. But plugins are owned by root:wheel, 755 chmoded, and it works. (other

Re: Why there are so many binary packages missing?

2009-12-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes: Matthew Seaman wrote: Yuri wrote: I am seeing this for a long time. If I use 'portupgrade -aPP' (packages only) there is a very large percentage of packages missing. Upgrading becomes many times faster when binary packages available are available. Missing

Re: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out...

2009-12-02 Thread Kurt Buff
Hmm... # ll /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins total 128 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68 Sep 13 09:44 libjavaplugin_oji.so - /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/plugin/amd64/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 130658 Sep 13 13:12 npwrapper.libflashplayer.so # ll

Re: How known?

2009-12-02 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:39:03PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said: Be nice to suggest to the mutt folks to let this be turned on only for certain email. I *have* tried to sub to the mutt mailinglist,

Re: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out...

2009-12-02 Thread Samuel Martín Moro
I think you should move browser_plugins content to firefox3/plugins, remove browser_plugins, and then link it to firefox3/plugins. Samuel Martín Moro CamTrace {EPITECH.} tek4 Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ... Xorg.conf(5) On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Bob Johnson
On 11/28/09, Peggy Wilkins enli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone elaborate on what exactly this statement in the 8.0 detailed release notes means? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS 2.2.5 File Systems “dangerously dedicated” mode for the UFS file system is no

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread usleepless
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred way of cleaning out the old stuff.. Early this century I started removing packages by

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Randi Harper wrote: I'm going to just reply to all of these at once. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread Chris Rees
2009/12/2 usleepl...@gmail.com: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there?  this time i'll make a not of the preferred way of cleaning out the old stuff.. Early this century

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread usleepless
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/12/2 usleepl...@gmail.com: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a

imagemagick/tiff lib - inverted tiffs since upgrade

2009-12-02 Thread Olivier Mueller
Hello, I just spent some time with an issue: after a standard upgrade (by luck on a test server), the image generation/conversion part of a webpage is not working correctly anymore: pictures (which are dynamically re-sized with pecl-imagick) are simply inverted (but only TIFF's). Before:

Re: How known?

2009-12-02 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:19:38AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:39:03PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said: Be nice to suggest to the mutt folks to let this be turned on only for

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:38:18PM +0100, usleepl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred way of cleaning

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Randi Harper
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: Some of the responses have said that UFS handling of 'Dangerously dedicated' has not gone away, just sysinstall handling of it. That may be true and if that is true, then you can probably still access dangerously dedicated

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:48:05AM -0800, Randi Harper wrote: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: Some of the responses have said that UFS handling of 'Dangerously dedicated' has not gone away, just sysinstall handling of it. That may be true and if that

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:30:10AM -0500, Bob Johnson wrote: On 11/28/09, Peggy Wilkins enli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone elaborate on what exactly this statement in the 8.0 detailed release notes means? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS 2.2.5 File

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:09:22 -0500, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: Good. Except that in FreeBSD land you are talking about a slice table. To carry things forward consistently, the partition table is within a slice and describes FreeBSD partitions a..h (and more now I guess). Only in

Re: which is the better way...?

2009-12-02 Thread Gary Kline
# cd /var/db/pkg # pkg_delete PKG # Use Tab key for completion. # pkgdb -vFa is in my ~/.HowTo file. thanks for the datapoints and the chuckles, gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org

How to change dst IP in packet with IPFW

2009-12-02 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send

Re: How to change dst IP in packet with IPFW

2009-12-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote: Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW? Normally this was done using natd's redirect_address capability. In newer versions of FreeBSD, IPFW has grown internal support for doing nat redirects without using the userland natd; for example, see

Why LANG variable doesn't change the language?

2009-12-02 Thread Yuri
I am running (under bash): LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 opera and all menu items are still in English. Same with firefox3. Why LANG isn't switched by LANG variable? Yuri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 8.0-RELEASE and dangerously dedicated disks

2009-12-02 Thread George Davidovich
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Randi Harper wrote: I'm going to just reply to all of these at once. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy Wilkins wrote:

Re[2]: How to change dst IP in packet with IPFW

2009-12-02 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Chuck. Вы писали 2 декабря 2009 г., 22:28:23: CS On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote: Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW? CS Normally this was done using natd's redirect_address capability. CS In newer versions of FreeBSD, IPFW has grown internal support for

Re: Why LANG variable doesn't change the language?

2009-12-02 Thread daniele
Hi ! I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual way: THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/firefox3-i18n/pkg-descr And this is for firefox35

nfsd can't listen on udp

2009-12-02 Thread Ksh J. Fry
Hi, I'm running nfsd on FreeBSD (7.2 and 8.0) but it seem don't listen on udp. $ tail /etc/rc.conf rpcbind_enable=YES rpc_lockd_enable=YES rpc_statd_enable=YES nfs_server_enable=YES nfs_server_flags=-t -u -n 4 mountd_flags=-p 962 -r $ netstat -a -f inet | grep nfsd tcp4 0 0 *.nfsd

Re: Why LANG variable doesn't change the language?

2009-12-02 Thread Yuri
daniele wrote: Hi ! I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual way: THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/firefox3-i18n/pkg-descr And this is for firefox35

Re: Why LANG variable doesn't change the language?

2009-12-02 Thread Yuri
daniele wrote: Hi ! I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual way: THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3 Language pack (firefox3-i18n-3.0.15) for firefox didn't translate menus at all. Tools item got Quick Locale Switcher menu which

Re: Re[3]: How to change dst IP in packet with IPFW

2009-12-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote: Actually I have google clue: http://gara.opennet.ru/http_redirect.html but it is impossible to implement that with IPFW NAT. And now -a and -proxy_only are exclusive but in article as you can sen in examples they are not. article is

Re: Firefox 3.5 and Epiphany crashing since the GNOME 2.28 update

2009-12-02 Thread Curly Brace
I just finished a forced rebuild of all my ports, but the crashes persist. On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:29 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:44:00AM -0500, Curly Brace wrote: Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no problems, but now Firefox 3.5

missing operating system

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Steele
Okay, so I've seen this error many times and its cause has always been clear. In this case I'm stumped. I've got a 3U SuperMicro server with 16 drives hooked up to two 3Ware controllers. The drives are configured into two logical drives da0 and da1. I've installed a FreeBSD 8.0 OS on da0 but

RE: missing operating system

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Steele
I had meant to include my partition table in the last email: # fdisk -p da0 # /dev/da0 g c1458908 h255 s63 p 1 0xa5 63 35664237 a 1 p 2 0xa5 35664300 62862345 p 3 0xa5 98526645 1863989820 This is what I'd expect it to be. If I use the -u option I get this: # fdisk -u da0 *** Working on

Re: missing operating system

2009-12-02 Thread Aftab Jahan Subedar
U can safely use the sysinstall to go to fdisk to view the partition table. There set bootable yes press 'w' to write answer if u want boot mgr or not should help. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Peter Steele pste...@maxiscale.com wrote: Okay, so I've seen this error many times and its cause

Problems with wifi and macbook

2009-12-02 Thread FW
I have successfully installed freebsd on my macbook (yay!), but I can't figure out how to make the wifi work. Wired networking works great. I am following the directions here : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.html, but I have only got up to section 31.3.3.1, since I

Re: Why LANG variable doesn't change the language?

2009-12-02 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:42:13 -0800 Yuri wrote: daniele wrote: I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual way: THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3 Language pack (firefox3-i18n-3.0.15) for firefox didn't translate menus at all. Tools