Thanks a lot to all who responded to my post.
I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x 2TB
green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up as
a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
Btw. will these drive work better in a ZFS pool/tank
Thomas Exner thomas.ex...@uni-konstanz.de wrote:
when running fsck the first error message is ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
...
Is there a chance to get the data back?
Dunno about current versions, but IIRC some earlier versions of
dump(8) could handle even a badly-corrupted FS. No harm in trying,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Andy Wodfer wod...@gmail.com wrote:
I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x 2TB
green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up as
a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
Btw. will these drive work
Thanks a lot to all who responded to my post.
I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x
2TB
green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up
as
a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
Btw. will these drive work better in a ZFS
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to be
the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
With 'ZFS: do not give it all your HDD'
On 18 November 2010 13:51, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 11/18/2010 7:16 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to build a server that's intended to store uncompressed
videofiles
(where 1 hour film equals about 500GB). I plan on using Western Digital
2TB
or 3TB SATA harddrives.
On 19 November 2010 09:48, Andy Wodfer wod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to be
the same if
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:44:12 +
Paul Wootton p...@fletchermoorland.co.uk wrote:
Here is a copy from smartctl
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 092 092 000Old_age
Always - 5958
193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 001 001 000Old_age
Always -
On 19/11/2010 10:00, krad wrote:
If you already have a 3ware card and you are familiar with them, why not let
it do the raid and just plonk zfs on top of the lun presented to the system?
Will make booting off pure zfs much easier.
There's a lot of duplication of function there -- both ZFS and
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to
be
the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
With 'ZFS: do not give it all your HDD'
On 19 November 2010 10:25, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:
On 19/11/2010 10:00, krad wrote:
If you already have a 3ware card and you are familiar with them, why not
let
it do the raid and just plonk zfs on top of the lun presented to the
system?
Will make booting off
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:58 AM, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
A few people have mentioned labelling the drives. Its a good thing to do,
but take it a step further. Before you put the drives in the system,
physically label them with something identifiable (colored sticker, number
whatever).
Hi, Freebsd-questions.
I ran FreeBSD 9-Current.
System sometimes page faults.
Does FBSD comunity need core dumps? If so where I can put dumps for
you?
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Nov 15 09:38:53 2010
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300
From: c0re nr1c...@gmail.com
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: openssl version - how to verify
2010/11/15 Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net:
There are still too many
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote:
_authoritative_ answer: You _cannot_.
Statement rationale:
The number of discovered bugs in any system is a finite number.
The number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
one.
By
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com articulated:
While I agree with your point in this context, the statement The
number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
one. is false.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com articulated:
While I agree with your point in this context, the statement The
number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
Hello and thanks for your feedback!
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:03 +0100, end...@gmail.com wrote:
[...@pandora ~]$ php -v -c /usr/local/etc/php.ini-production
PHP 5.3.2 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 14 2010 18:11:48)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.3.0,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:53:11 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com articulated:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com articulated:
While I agree with your point in this
2010/11/20 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru:
Hi, Freebsd-questions.
I ran FreeBSD 9-Current.
System sometimes page faults.
Does FBSD comunity need core dumps? If so where I can put dumps for
you?
-CURRENT is 'bleeding-edge'; and if you're using it you should be
subscribing to
Hi Alex, thanks for this even better feedback.
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:22 +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
This is not the correct fix, the correct fix is to enable threads in
php, using the appropriate OPTION.
Ok, so probably this one:
LINKTHR=off (default) Link thread lib (for threaded
[Originally from freebsd-hackers@ / Feb 2008; freebsd-net Jun 2010]
All:
pf conf/63700 got the ball rolling on fixing cloned/VLAN
interface management with rc.d/netif, but a very specific problem
still remains.
For example, adding an alias to a VLAN and running:
/etc/rc.d/netif restart
I have a weird DNS problem I am hoping someone can help me with.
I have server running FBSD 8.0. /etc/resolv.conf is set to use my ISP's DNS
servers for name resolution.
If run dig @ns3.socket.net .yyy. the INTERNAL ip address of the server
is returned.
If I run d...@ns3.socket.net
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing NAT.
Said Juniper had a smart DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on DNS
packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the DNS ALG to
fix the problem.
If your ns is behind a NATing device, start
On 11/15/10 21:06, Chris Rees wrote:
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boostenpe...@boosten.org wrote:
He's consistent in any case (a quick google search reveals this 2008
message):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg192926.html
Consistent, but still just spouting
On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing
NAT. Said Juniper had a smart DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on
DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the
DNS ALG to fix
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com articulated:
While I agree with your point in this context, the statement The
number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Maciej Milewski wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 08:37:51, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Apparently only the version for kde4 is on the ports and I could not find a
package for 3.5. Building the available source had some interesting results
but ultimate did not work. What I
On 11/13/10 16:08, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Bruce Cranbr...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:08:51 -0500
Chris Brennanxa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Did you know...
If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages,
but what's
29 matches
Mail list logo
