Re: VirtualBox USB support

2011-12-28 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
27.12.2011 19:55, Alain G. Fabry wrote: Hello in the FreeBSD handbook it mentions there's USB support in Virtualbox. In other sources I read however that the VBoxPuelMain module is not supported in FreeBSD. VirtualBox comes with basic USB support, extension pack provides USB2.0 support.

Re: FreeBSD EC2 Status

2011-12-28 Thread Любомир Григоров
My friend did an installation to try it out. He is currently running Apache for over a week with no problems. Nothing heavier was done. -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 12/28/11 8:54 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Colleagues, This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some network administrators reading this list know the answer. Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders? Will it work or create an

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 28/12/2011 07:54, Victor Sudakov wrote: This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some network administrators reading this list know the answer. Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders? Will it work or create an endless loop of DNS

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Damien Fleuriot wrote: If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response time, here's your scenario: DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries Your cache will start building up and only responses that are not cached will

vmcore

2011-12-28 Thread KES
I am have vmcore files but kernel has compiled without -g can I take any usefull information about 'why this problem occour'? cat info.0 info.1 info.2 Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 380215296B (362 MB) Blocksize: 512

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response time, here's your scenario: DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries Your cache will start building up

mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Peter Andreev
2011/12/28 Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd: On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response time, here's your scenario: DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all

ISP driver and FreeBSD

2011-12-28 Thread Omer Faruk SEN
Hi, I have a dual port HBA: isp0@pci0:2:0:0:class=0x0c0400 card=0x015d1077 chip=0x25321077 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'QLogic Corporation' device = '8Gb PCIe x8 Single/Dual Fibre Channel HBA (ISP2532)' class = serial bus subclass = Fibre Channel

ZFS upgrade path

2011-12-28 Thread James Edwards
Hello all, I currently have a FreeBSD server colocated and it isn't always physically accessible. I was trying to develop an upgrade path for my server, in hopes to mainly save a trip to the colo center. There are four disks, all in a single storage pool - tank. Here is the naming convention I

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Damien Fleuriot wrote: If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response time, here's your scenario: DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries Your cache will start building up and only responses that are not

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Peter Andreev wrote: [dd] Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence on this value is lesser. So I advice you to keep all as is. Be it so. Thank you. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN

Re[8]: high load system do not take all CPU time

2011-12-28 Thread Коньков Евгений
RB [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines] RB You've been told the following, *repeatedly*: RB Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic RB it is being subjected to. RB Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems with RB heavy network

Re: hooking /usr/ports/graphics/gnash to /usr/ports/www/firefox ?

2011-12-28 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100 Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi questions@ [snip] Externaly { man gnash says what to do from CLI, But I'm not clear what the URL is, of the flash to save

how to tell that a file exists and is not 0-len?

2011-12-28 Thread Gary Kline
guys, access(filenamewithpath, F_OK) returned true as Zero if i have access to it. what do i use in C to tell me that a file is not empty? fstat? or is there something more common? thanks, gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix

Re: how to tell that a file exists and is not 0-len?

2011-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 28/12/2011 23:50, Gary Kline wrote: access(filenamewithpath, F_OK) returned true as Zero if i have access to it. what do i use in C to tell me that a file is not empty? fstat? or is there something more common? stat(2) which uses the file path -- unless you have an open file

RE: how to tell that a file exists and is not 0-len?

2011-12-28 Thread Devin Teske
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Kline Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:50 PM To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: how to tell that a file exists and is not 0-len? guys,

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Victor Sudakov wrote: Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence on this value is lesser. So I advice you to keep all as is. Be it so. Thank you. And the reason for the whole thread. One

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Kevin Wilcox
On Dec 28, 2011 9:26 PM, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: And the reason for the whole thread. One of the customers told me that 8.8.8.8 is faster than our own DNS servers which are located on the same 100 MBit/s LAN with them. I was shocked but it seems true, at least for the

Re: hooking /usr/ports/graphics/gnash to /usr/ports/www/firefox ?

2011-12-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100 Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi questions@ [snip] Externaly { man gnash says what to do from CLI,

Re: hooking /usr/ports/graphics/gnash to /usr/ports/www/firefox ?

2011-12-28 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:39:40 +0100 Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote: Hi, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100 Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi questions@ [snip]

portmaster --list-origins question

2011-12-28 Thread Scott Bennett
[N.B. Please reply directly or Cc: me in any replies. I read -questions in the digest form, so there can be a delay of a day or more before I see replies posted only to the list. Thanks.] I was in the process of preparing to upgrade from 7.4 to 8.2 (at last!), when I encountered a

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Peter Andreev
2011/12/29 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su: Victor Sudakov wrote: Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence on this value is lesser. So I advice you to keep all as is. Be it so. Thank

Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND

2011-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Peter Andreev wrote: Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence on this value is lesser. So I advice you to keep all as is. Be it so. Thank you. And the reason for the whole