Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Fbsd8
Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 1/19/12 3:25 AM, Allan McKinnon wrote: I finally got to install FreeBSD 9 onto my computer and noticed that the installer is now different. It seems to me that it forces you into doing extra steps that I was comfortable doing on my own. I really enjoyed the old

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/20/12 9:36 AM, Fbsd8 wrote: Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 1/19/12 3:25 AM, Allan McKinnon wrote: I finally got to install FreeBSD 9 onto my computer and noticed that the installer is now different. It seems to me that it forces you into doing extra steps that I was comfortable doing on my

[SOLVED] A quick fix for Firefox mailto: issues

2012-01-20 Thread Da Rock
I don't know who else has come across this, or who even uses this particular combination of firefox and thunderbird. I use it for the sake of my users, so its just easier to be a roman in rome. I have setup IceWM as the standard though. In firefox when one clicks on a mailto: link it fails to

Was... A quick fix for Firefox mailto: issues Now... The other way round problem

2012-01-20 Thread Leslie Jensen
Excuse me for using this thread but I feel I have a problem related to this, but with Thunderbird not opening URLs. I followed all instructions I can find, but have not been successful. Using the config editor I added the following, and have checked that it is in the file prefs.js:

freebsd-update and src.txz

2012-01-20 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Is it true that freebsd-update does not update the souce files from 8.2-R to 9.0-RELEASE? And if not what is the best way to get the src.txz installed on an updated system? I do have the disc1 iso. Is src.txz installed under /usr/src or /usr/src/sys?

Re: Was... A quick fix for Firefox mailto: issues Now... The other way round problem

2012-01-20 Thread Leslie Jensen
2012-01-20 17:16, Leslie Jensen skrev: Excuse me for using this thread but I feel I have a problem related to this, but with Thunderbird not opening URLs. I followed all instructions I can find, but have not been successful. Using the config editor I added the following, and have checked

libjawt.so and libz.so.5

2012-01-20 Thread ajtiM
Hi! I ran pkg_libchk on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 and I got: libreoffice-3.4.5: /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/libofficebean.so misses libjawt.so I did check and I have /usr/local/openjdk6/jre/lib/i386/libjawt.so I had installed diableo which I deinstalled and install openjdk6. I

Re: libjawt.so and libz.so.5

2012-01-20 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:21:38 -0600, ajtiM wrote: The other one is with Opera-11-60: /usr/local/lib/opera/liboperagtk2.so misses libz.so.5 I have on the system ;ibz.so.6 I think you need to reinstall Opera so it will be linked against the current version libz.so.6. Maybe you have left out

Re: libjawt.so and libz.so.5

2012-01-20 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 20 January 2012 14:21, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I ran pkg_libchk on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 and I got: libreoffice-3.4.5: /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/libofficebean.so misses libjawt.so I did check and I have /usr/local/openjdk6/jre/lib/i386/libjawt.so I had

Re: freebsd-update and src.txz

2012-01-20 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:24:53 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Is it true that freebsd-update does not update the souce files from 8.2-R to 9.0-RELEASE? I think also updating src/ is the default behaviour. See man freebsd-update.conf, setting Components: The parameters following this

Re: libjawt.so and libz.so.5

2012-01-20 Thread ajtiM
On Friday 20 January 2012 13:41:25 Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:21:38 -0600, ajtiM wrote: The other one is with Opera-11-60: /usr/local/lib/opera/liboperagtk2.so misses libz.so.5 I have on the system ;ibz.so.6 I think you need to reinstall Opera so it will be linked

problem to kill -KILL process

2012-01-20 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi # ps ax|grep rad 45471 ?? TLs 263:35.44 /usr/local/sbin/radiusd 26473 1 S+ 0:00.00 grep rad flux# date Fri Jan 20 23:20:28 UTC 2012 flux# kill -KILL 45471 flux# date Fri Jan 20 23:20:41 UTC 2012 flux# kill -KILL 45471 flux# date Fri Jan 20 23:20:54 UTC 2012 flux# kill -KILL 45471

Re: Was... A quick fix for Firefox mailto: issues Now... The other way round problem

2012-01-20 Thread Da Rock
On 01/21/12 02:27, Leslie Jensen wrote: 2012-01-20 17:16, Leslie Jensen skrev: Excuse me for using this thread but I feel I have a problem related to this, but with Thunderbird not opening URLs. I followed all instructions I can find, but have not been successful. Using the config editor I

Re: Was... A quick fix for Firefox mailto: issues Now... The other way round problem

2012-01-20 Thread Tim Kellers
If you backed up up your ~/.thunderbird file before you upgraded (yes, I was shocked to see that I actually did back mine up), copy the mimeTypes.rdf from your old install to the new install (its in the .thunderbird directory, 2 levels down) and your browser of choice will launch on a

kgzip(8) regression in RELENG_9 GENERIC

2012-01-20 Thread Devin Teske
Taking a GENERIC 9.0-RELEASE kernel and running kgzip(8) on it produces an unusable kernel which causes immediate BTX halt in loader(8). NOTE: This is w.r.t. a completely un-modified src-tree (including the GENERIC config itself). Just thought I'd share this regression. 8.1-RELEASE-p6 doesn't

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread gore
I've been sort of keeping track of this particular thread, because it interested me, and after reading through, I'd like to share my personal opinions. Now, before I go any further, let me just state here and now; This is my personal opinion, so, please, don't take this in a bad way, or in the

* Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Devin Teske
Sent from my iPhone On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:43 PM, gore koggy...@comcast.net wrote: [snip] I also bought the newer 4th Edition when it came out. (Having Marshal Kirk McKusick do the forward made me happy, he's one of my personal heros. I also got to speak with him recently and I was almost

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Sierchio
I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX! It blow chunks. It's a POS. It's crap. It is a joke. I hope I made myself clear. ;-) - M ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Lyubomir Grigorov
Just to give thoughts as a younger user... I first touched FreeBSD around 2005. The current insteller is much more appealing and useful. All the people displaying elitist attitude toward the arcaic installer which infact DID push people away from FreeBSD, I don't understand you. The old

Re: FreeBSD 9

2012-01-20 Thread 'Frank Shute'
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:31:00PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote: -Original Message- From: 'Frank Shute' [mailto:fr...@shute.org.uk] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:52 PM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Chad Perrin'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Dave Robison Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Lyubomir Grigorov lyubo...@grigorovl.eu wrote: Just to give thoughts as a younger user... Also, there was plently of time during RC to discuss this, I don't see why you all cry right now. To me, it seems you are afraid of change and getting out of your comfort

Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 21 Jan 2012, at 05:47, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote: I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.1, and IMHO, the 9.0 installer SUX! It blow chunks. It's a POS. It's crap. It is a joke. I hope I made myself clear. ;-) - M Just because you see things a certain way doesn't

Re: * Re: Horrible installer

2012-01-20 Thread Chad Perrin
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:19:32PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote: On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:43 PM, gore koggy...@comcast.net wrote: why not just use 8.x or something? I'm not being sarcastic or anything either, I really am asking why not jut go to 8.2 which I also Loved? SU+J by Kirk