On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:28:29 +0100
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
I suspect whoever you were talking to probably has more of a clue
than I do. As a quick data point, I just ran portsnap fetch update
while another process did a df /var; sleep 1 loop and /var
increased by about 30MB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT
On 02.07.2010 09:33, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT
On 2 July 2010 08:33, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running
krad writes:
all i can say is your a brave boy 8) A 1 TB+ / slice would take
ages to fsck.
For ages being less than ten (fifteen ?) minutes on a modern
system with reasonable memory ...
... which should be necessary very rarely. Even on my test
system, time between
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:33:45 +0100
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Is it time for me to start advocating one big partition again?
This may not be the consensus view, but I have found that for a quiet
life and general lack of botheration it helps to create *only two*
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:29:54PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to
and see if I have
On 07/02/10 13:13, Bruce Cran wrote:
I have a task on my TODO list to increase the sizes of the partitions in
sysinstall: for example / goes to 1GB, /var to 4GB. I hope to commit
the code in the next couple of weeks.
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB
for
Arthur Chance writes:
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in,
why 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made
/ 1GB as I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't
really enough, and then decided to make /var bigger than the
Handbook
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why
4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as
I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't really
enough, and
On 07/02/10 15:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100
Arthur Chancefree...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why
4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as
I'd found out from a previous install that
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the install.
I've taken the following steps:
# csup -4
On Jul 01 11:24, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the install.
I've taken the
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this problem?
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make
installkernel', and all seems OK.
Chip,
That sounds like a smart thing to do; can you tell me more about how
to do that (or point me to a www resource; I'm happy to read more
about that).
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the install.
I've taken
On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this problem?
Ed
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
it, I just
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this
A healthy fear, indeed.
For one thing, I'd certainly rather have someone
do rm /boot/kernel.old/*.ko than rm -r /boot/kernel.old.
Being even more selective is an obvious extension...
Why not move the old useless kernel to another drive. Sure if the system
kernel fails and you need the old
Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
not make the / partition maybe 1G?
I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly
larger / partition would impact performance that
On 1 July 2010 21:12, Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
not make the / partition maybe 1G?
I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:24:46AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:07:50PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this problem?
Many people find
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to
and see if I have the same problem, and I did.
Apparently, 512M is just, not,
Henrik Hudson writes:
Or just make one large partition. Not on a server, but I don't
see much reason for using multiple partitions on a laptop.
Multiple partitions still isn't a bad idea if you ever have to
fsck and even on a desktop / laptop I usually mount /tmp as
noexec.
On Jul 01 12:29, Chip Camden wrote:
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this
30 matches
Mail list logo
