Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-17 Thread Gary Aitken
On 11/16/12 21:38, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: On 11/16/12 12:10, Warren Block wrote: Additional SSD suggestions: when creating partitions, leave out the swap partition. If you have lots of memory, leave out the /tmp partition. Add that extra space to the

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Gary Aitken
On 11/15/12 15:56, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: Trying to rebuild ports, I'm consistently getting the following: ahcich1 Timeout on slot 13 port 0 ^ slot varies g_vfs_done() ada0p6 [WRITE(offset=38838571008 length=4096)]error=6

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: ~$ gpart show ada0 = 34 250069613 ada0 GPT (119G) 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 41943040 2 freebsd-ufs (20G) / 419432021048576 3 freebsd-swap (512M)swap 429917788388608 4

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Gary Aitken
~$ gpart show ada0 = 34 250069613 ada0 GPT (119G) 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 41943040 2 freebsd-ufs (20G) / 419432021048576 3 freebsd-swap (512M)swap 429917788388608 4 freebsd-ufs (4.0G) /var 51380386

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: ~$ gpart show ada0 = 34 250069613 ada0 GPT (119G) 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 41943040 2 freebsd-ufs (20G) / 419432021048576 3 freebsd-swap (512M)swap 429917788388608 4

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Gary Aitken
On 11/16/12 12:10, Warren Block wrote: ~$ gpart show ada0 = 34 250069613 ada0 GPT (119G) 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 41943040 2 freebsd-ufs (20G) / 419432021048576 3 freebsd-swap (512M)swap 429917788388608 4

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-16 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: On 11/16/12 12:10, Warren Block wrote: Additional SSD suggestions: when creating partitions, leave out the swap partition. If you have lots of memory, leave out the /tmp partition. Add that extra space to the /usr partition. Format the UFS filesystems

9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-15 Thread Gary Aitken
Trying to rebuild ports, I'm consistently getting the following: ahcich1 Timeout on slot 13 port 0 ^ slot varies g_vfs_done() ada0p6 [WRITE(offset=38838571008 length=4096)]error=6 /usr got error 6 while accessing filesyustem cpuid=0 panic:

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-15 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.orgwrote: Error 6 is ENXIO, device not configured; not sure exactly what that means. This machine has: 16G mem 0.5G swap 2G /tmp 4G /var Is any of that likely to be related to the problem? Given an addr in

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-15 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:30:43 -0600 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like you have bad hardware. Drive, cable, controller etc. Probably wouldn't hurt to do a fsck either. *After* identifying and fixing the hardware problem, otherwise you may make things worse. --

Re: 9.0 crash, ssd or filesystem problem?

2012-11-15 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: Trying to rebuild ports, I'm consistently getting the following: ahcich1 Timeout on slot 13 port 0 ^ slot varies g_vfs_done() ada0p6 [WRITE(offset=38838571008 length=4096)]error=6 That seems familiar, maybe others have

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-06-02 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote: Warren Block wrote: Thank you very much for the useful tips. One more question regarding SSD. The FreeBSD installer enabled journaled soft-updates on the filesystem which resides on the SSD. Is it good, bad or irrelevant for the SSD ? Mostly

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-06-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
filesystem which resides on the SSD. Is it good, bad or irrelevant for the SSD ? Mostly irrelevant, I think. I've been using just ordinary soft updates as there is bug fixing going on with SU+J. fsck on the SSD is very fast anyway, so SU+J is needed less. And there's a little less writing

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-06-01 Thread Victor Sudakov
Warren Block wrote: [dd] I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really need to? Is anything else advisable? If it's not aligned, there can be a pretty significant performance drop. Please show the output of 'gpart show' on that drive if it's GPT (gpart show ada0) or

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-05-31 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote: Colleagues, I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on a SSD drive with the following tweaking so far: 1. tmpmfs=YES (WRKDIRPREFIX etc will go there too). 2. mount -o noatime 3. tunefs -t enable I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-05-31 Thread Victor Sudakov
Warren Block wrote: I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on a SSD drive with the following tweaking so far: 1. tmpmfs=YES (WRKDIRPREFIX etc will go there too). 2. mount -o noatime 3. tunefs -t enable I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really need to? Is anything

Re: 9.0 on SSD

2012-05-31 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote: Warren Block wrote: I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on a SSD drive with the following tweaking so far: 1. tmpmfs=YES (WRKDIRPREFIX etc will go there too). 2. mount -o noatime 3. tunefs -t enable I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I

9.0 on SSD

2012-05-30 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues, I have installed 9.0-RELEASE on a SSD drive with the following tweaking so far: 1. tmpmfs=YES (WRKDIRPREFIX etc will go there too). 2. mount -o noatime 3. tunefs -t enable I have not done any tricky partition alignment, do I really need to? Is anything else advisable? There is