Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-30 Thread Martin Hepworth
Jonathon presumably all the nameserver is doing is forwarding requests to your ISP, as set in the named.boot file? also I guess you're running bind in which case it will cache automatically. probably best to just have it running on the gateway then it will cache requests from all clients.

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-30 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:00:03AM +, Martin Hepworth wrote: : Jonathon : : presumably all the nameserver is doing is forwarding requests to your : ISP, as set in the named.boot file? also I guess you're running bind in : which case it will cache automatically. I believe so. I set up a

Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with limited : bandwidth. After RTFM, I believe I have it up and running. ;-) Named is running, but how

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread David Jenkins
On Mon, 29 November, 2004 20:44, Jonathon McKitrick said: On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with limited : bandwidth. After RTFM, I

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Risdon
Jonathon McKitrick wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with limited : bandwidth. After RTFM, I believe I have it up and running. ;-)

RE: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Subhro
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathon McKitrick Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:15 To: Peter Risdon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Caching DNS for dialup On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter