On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:53:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
after the next reboot.
Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't
[snip]
--
Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43
1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include stdio.h for FILE define,
complained by:
[snip]
and
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after
the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the new gcc version will really make a significant
difference.
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
after the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
after
the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet?
On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:12:09 Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24:
2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br
Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel
with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i
