Sorry, I agree with you, s/GUI/graphic based/ in my post. I've just
Yes - graphics based. I use graphics based programs like gimp, links
-g, opera, xv xzgv, gv and xdvi.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
sincerely assume that.
well here in poland people do see a difference, because computer has to be
bought, while windoze can be pirated.
in my 320 user network less than ten bought windoze, over 300 uses pirated
one, 10 uses my X-terminals.
and it's good for microsoft. if police in poland
User-friendliness is obviously subjective. Some people consider a
my definition is that user friendly system does what i want, does it right
and quickly. simply - it's my slave. not my master.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know why i was using
such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of the user interface
ingrained as a measure of the capabilities of the machine. Granted, it could
be only because she's ten, but I think we'd find a lot of people think
I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI,
how would you define
He probably equates a desktop environment (such as KDE/Gnome/etc.) to a GUI.
most people exactly equates that and i stated i that such defined GUI is
completely useless and actually takes over time and
Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
Reid Linnemann wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She
saw my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know
why i was using such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of
the user interface ingrained as a measure of
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that.
I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI,
how
Am Freitag 10 August 2007 10:57:38 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that.
I
On GdaĆsk technical university there was a man about 50 years teaching
people unix (mostly).
what he talked very often:
---
DO NOT use windows EVER. Not because it's slow, not because it crashes,
and not because it can't do much. Not because of security too.
But because it's teaching BAD
On August 10, 2007 at 03:47AM Wojciech Puchar wrote:
well here in poland people do see a difference, because computer has to be
bought, while windoze can be pirated.
I was not aware of any place where they gave computers away.
in my 320 user network less than ten bought windoze, over 300
idea how, and I was expecting a nice user-friendly GUI, like Windoze, but
without the constant crashes.
that's what most people expect. and thats why i say:
Windows it the most windows compatible system available. don't change to
other.
In 1999 I purchased The complete FreeBSD, 3rd
Hi Gerard,
Gerard wrote:
I was not aware of any place where they gave computers away.
In the UK we call them skips. Not sure what the rest of the world
calls them. [Large metal junk containers placed at the back of large
buildings near the other bins. They're usually hired rather than
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text and
graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config, there are
plenty of nice other wm's good for
Written by Wojciech Puchar on 08/09/07 12:04
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text and
graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:04:50 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a perfect desktop system.
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:15:08 -0500
Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She
saw my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know
why i was using such an old computer. [...] Granted, it could be
only because
Reid Linnemann wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She saw
my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know why i
was using such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of the user
interface ingrained as a measure of the capabilities of
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
My ten year old niece has been brainwashed by the GUI quagmire. She saw
my FreeBSD 6-STABLE console on my amd64 3000+ and wanted to know why i
was using such an old computer. She had the visual aspect of the user
interface
18 matches
Mail list logo