On 11/16/2012 08:52 AM, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hi Andreas,
do I understand it right - the default behaviour of freebsd-update will
be to update a 9.0 system to 9.1 when it becomes available? So this is
a rolling procedure?
Hi
No it only updates the release you have.
To
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:04:17 -0800
mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
Thanks for the clearification. One technical thing: is it possible, to
upgrade
from FreeBSD 9.0 to 9.1 with the freebsd-update utility?
Andreas Yes, it is.
Can I go from 8.3 directly to 9.1, or
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:52:02 +0100
Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net wrote:
do I understand it right - the default behaviour of freebsd-update will
be to update a 9.0 system to 9.1 when it becomes available? So this is
a rolling procedure?
I ask this because I could not find a
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:38:43 +0100, Andreas Rudisch wrote:
But keep in mind that you will have to recompile/
reinstall all installed ports.
This is not required as long as you install the compatn-1x
port. But as soon as you update some port, or maybe want to
install something new, things tend
On 2012-11-15 15:57, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hello,
from a freshly installed FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE I did a freebsd-update
to bring
it to the latest patch level.
After:
# freebsd-update fetch
I got this message:
WARNING: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE is approaching its End-of-Life
Hello,
from a freshly installed FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE I did a freebsd-update to bring
it to the latest patch level.
After:
# freebsd-update fetch
I got this message:
WARNING: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE is approaching its End-of-Life date.
It is strongly recommended that you
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net wrote:
Where can I find more information on the planned lifecycles of the current
and upcoming releases? Are there any?
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
Scroll down about halfway. 9.0 is a regular release, EOL is January
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.netwrote:
Hello,
from a freshly installed FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE I did a freebsd-update to
bring
it to the latest patch level.
After:
# freebsd-update fetch
I got this message:
WARNING: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:35:52 -0800
Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
Scroll down about halfway. 9.0 is a regular release, EOL is January 31, 2013.
Alternate releases are extended releases, so 9.1 will have a 2 year
support span.
Thanks for
On 15 November 2012, at 14:46, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:35:52 -0800
Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
Scroll down about halfway. 9.0 is a regular release, EOL is January 31,
2013.
Alternate releases are
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:46:53 +0100
Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net wrote:
Thanks for the clearification. One technical thing: is it possible, to upgrade
from FreeBSD 9.0 to 9.1 with the freebsd-update utility?
Yes, it is.
Andreas
--
GnuPG key : 0x2A573565|
Andreas == Andreas Rudisch cyb.@gmx.net writes:
Andreas On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:46:53 +0100
Andreas Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net wrote:
Thanks for the clearification. One technical thing: is it possible, to
upgrade
from FreeBSD 9.0 to 9.1 with the freebsd-update utility?
Andreas
On 15 November 2012, at 17:04, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Rudisch cyb.@gmx.net writes:
Andreas On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:46:53 +0100
Andreas Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net wrote:
Thanks for the clearification. One technical thing: is it possible, to
upgrade
from
Hi Andreas,
do I understand it right - the default behaviour of freebsd-update will
be to update a 9.0 system to 9.1 when it becomes available? So this is
a rolling procedure?
I ask this because I could not find a parameter etc. in the man page
which may influent this, e.g. to
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 22:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
When attempting to upgrade chromium-19.0.1084.56_1 to
chromium-20.0.1132.57 on FreeBSD9.0 (FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
When attempting to upgrade chromium-19.0.1084.56_1 to
chromium-20.0.1132.57 on FreeBSD9.0 (FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386), one of
the patches failed to apply
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD, decided to migrate a web server to FreeBSD. I
recently both a VPS that claim to use KVM as a virtualization service, I
don't know the details of the real hardware running behind nor what is
KVM running on. Anyway I have an issue with clock on my FreeBSD
installation that
Try
machdep.independent_wallclock=1
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Martin Dimitrov
martin.dimit...@mafiainc.org wrote:
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD, decided to migrate a web server to FreeBSD. I
recently both a VPS that claim to use KVM as a virtualization service, I
don't know the details of
Thanks, but it's not working:
# sysctl machdep.independent_wallclock=1
sysctl: unknown oid 'machdep.independent_wallclock'
I grep under /usr/src/sys for independent_wallclock and it appeared only
in ./i386/xen/clock.c, my architecture is amd64 if it matters.
On 06/05/2012 07:59 PM, Michael
Hi,
Today I have got a panic under the following scenario:
* FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE in VMWare ESXi virtualized host
* Very busy host (java compilers, NFS server, lot of UFS snapshots)
* apache web server
* pgsql and mysql databases
* GENERIC kernel
The panic happened after:
1- to umount a UFS
: 227.5 MiB (238500864 bytes, 465822 sectors from
7438095+63)
Type 0x82 (Linux swap / Solaris)
Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try
)
Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
.. so you May be out of luck ..
ext3 is ext2+journalling. If fsck supports ext3, then it can sync the
journal and the partition can be safely mounted as ext2.
It's a long time since
Hi,
Reference:
From: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:13:19 +0100
Message-id: 20120418141319.7cb8c...@gumby.homeunix.com
RW wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
How can I mount it ?
I'm confused between the BSD disklabel and DOS/MBR
(Linux swap / Solaris)
Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev
of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
How can I mount it ?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:06:44PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Odhiambo,
man mount
mount fstype device mount-point
Yes, but look:
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
I don't know why !?
Thanks,
pages, little-endian
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
How can I mount it ?
mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1s1 /mnt
7438095+63)
Type 0x82 (Linux swap / Solaris)
Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian
Swap size 227.4 MiB (238489600 bytes, 58225 pages of 4 KiB)
I'm running from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend
I don't know why !?
Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
Yes :
casa# kldstat | grep ext
91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
casa#
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:25:29PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
Hi Adam,
I don't know why !?
Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
Yes :
casa# kldstat | grep ext
91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
casa#
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs
On 3/30/12 5:48 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
After reading several sparse articles/post, I've come to the conclusion
that FreeBSD doesn't do well with SWAP 32GB; however it does allow it.
As such I decided to drop the swap to 8GB*2=16GB. Sadly that didn't
help either after dropping
On 03/28/12 03:09, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
It works out to roughly 7.7GB from 32MB okay fine.
If I double it, that should give me 15.4GB from 64MB (still not enough).
If I 16x it that should give me 246GB from 512MB. Thats more my
physical ram + swap. Oh well.
After reading several
On 03/27/12 02:32, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Some other tuning updates
$ zfs set zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1
$ sysctl vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
$ cat /etc/my.cnf
skip-innodb-doublewrite
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2
$ zfs set primarycache=metadata zmysqlD
$ zfs set atime=off
/var/log/messages
Mar 23 22:21:50 sabertooth kernel: swap zone exhausted, increase
kern.maxswzone
Mar 23 22:21:50 sabertooth kernel: pid 86697 (mysqld), uid 88, was
killed: out of swap space
how to repeat:
$ mysql -ux file.sql (~150GB) worth
basically, it slows down continually until it dies.
Some other tuning updates
$ zfs set zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1
$ sysctl vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
$ cat /etc/my.cnf
skip-innodb-doublewrite
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2
$ zfs set primarycache=metadata zmysqlD
$ zfs set atime=off zmysqlD
$ zfs set recordsize=16k zmysqlD
but not on zmysqlL
Hi All,
If I install FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT, I will be able to upgrade to
FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE (once available) via the freebsd-update utility, right?
That's what I'm getting from the following link:
http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/upgrade.html
BTW, does anyone know of any major
On May 13, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Mike Seda wrote:
If I install FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT, I will be able to upgrade to
FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE (once available) via the freebsd-update utility, right?
There isn't a supported RELENG_9 branch, yet.
Once it exists, it is likely that you could use freebsd
the
backported ZFS v28 patch such as the one below:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Mike
On 05/13/2011 11:35 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Mike Seda wrote:
If I install FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT, I will be able to upgrade to
FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE (once
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Mike Seda wrote:
Currently, I'm really only interested in using FreeBSD so that I can leverage
ZFS Deduplication (available in ZFS v21 and higher) on one server.
What is the best (most stable) way to get this functionality at the moment?
By definition, HEAD
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike Seda mas...@stanford.edu wrote:
All,
Currently, I'm really only interested in using FreeBSD so that I can
leverage ZFS Deduplication (available in ZFS v21 and higher) on one server.
What is the best (most stable) way to get this functionality at the
On 05/13/2011 02:20 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Mike Seda wrote:
Currently, I'm really only interested in using FreeBSD so that I can leverage
ZFS Deduplication (available in ZFS v21 and higher) on one server.
What is the best (most stable) way to get this
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:48:55PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of May 3, 2011 5:33:23 PM -0400, Jerry McAllister is alleged to have
said:
I don't remember seeing that.
Anyway, go to the FreeBSD Release Engineering web site for information.
Hi All,
When will FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE be available?
I remember reading that it would be ready in May 2011. I just wanted to
see if it was on schedule or not.
Thanks,
Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 3 May 2011 15:11, Mike Seda mas...@stanford.edu wrote:
Hi All,
When will FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE be available?
I remember reading that it would be ready in May 2011. I just wanted to see
if it was on schedule or not.
Dr. Who has been running it for two regenerations already.
Get
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Mike Seda wrote:
Hi All,
When will FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE be available?
I remember reading that it would be ready in May 2011. I just wanted to
see if it was on schedule or not.
I don't remember seeing that.
Anyway, go to the FreeBSD Release
--As of May 3, 2011 5:33:23 PM -0400, Jerry McAllister is alleged to have
said:
I don't remember seeing that.
Anyway, go to the FreeBSD Release Engineering web site for information.
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
--As for the rest, it is mine.
While that *should* be good
On Tue, 03 May 2011 20:48:55 -0400
Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
Basically, as far as I can tell, 9 and/or 8.3 will come out when they
come out. No sooner and no later.
I think the plan for 9.0 is some time this summer.
--
Bruce Cran
___
49 matches
Mail list logo
