Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-04 Thread perikillo
On 1/3/06, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/2/06, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see tun in your ipnat rule. That means you are using ppp for phone dialup connection. Every time you lose your phone connection you get different IP from your ISP. Use NAT function of PPP and

RE: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-03 Thread fbsd_user
On 1/2/06, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see tun in your ipnat rule. That means you are using ppp for phone dialup connection. Every time you lose your phone connection you get different IP from your ISP. Use NAT function of PPP and not ipnat and your problem will go away.

RE: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-02 Thread fbsd_user
I see tun in your ipnat rule. That means you are using ppp for phone dialup connection. Every time you lose your phone connection you get different IP from your ISP. Use NAT function of PPP and not ipnat and your problem will go away. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-02 Thread perikillo
On 1/2/06, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see tun in your ipnat rule. That means you are using ppp for phone dialup connection. Every time you lose your phone connection you get different IP from your ISP. Use NAT function of PPP and not ipnat and your problem will go away.

Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-01 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote perikillo thusly... root#chmod +x /etc/rc.d/ipnat.rules Why did you need to add execute bit for the rules? - Parv -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2006-01-01 Thread perikillo
On 1/1/06, Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote perikillo thusly... root#chmod +x /etc/rc.d/ipnat.rules Why did you need to add execute bit for the rules? - Parv -- Hi Parv. No, the file name is ipnat.bug, i make one mistake here. The rules

Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2005-12-31 Thread perikillo
On 12/30/05, Ruben Bloemgarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Caleb, Add ipfs_enable=YES. Regards, Ruben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of caleb Sent: December 31, 2005 3:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipnat -CF -f

RE: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules

2005-12-30 Thread Ruben Bloemgarten
Hi Caleb, Add ipfs_enable=YES. Regards, Ruben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of caleb Sent: December 31, 2005 3:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules Hi everyone, I have just put