Re: Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-09 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 09/01/2008, at 5:26 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: There is no directive, but you can edit the resultant .cf file and remove the line C{E}root or root from that line if more than one user. Be warned, you _will_ break /etc/crontab and periodic scripts mail delivery. The reason it needs

Re: Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 8, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: From the sendmail documentation: There are always users that need to be exposed -- that is, their internal site name should be displayed instead of the masquerade name. Root is an example (which has been exposed by default prior to 8.10). Is

Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-08 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
Hello, From the sendmail documentation: There are always users that need to be exposed -- that is, their internal site name should be displayed instead of the masquerade name. Root is an example (which has been exposed by default prior to 8.10). Is there actually any reason why root needs to

Re: Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Jerahmy Pocott wrote: Hello, From the sendmail documentation: There are always users that need to be exposed -- that is, their internal site name should be displayed instead of the masquerade name. Root is an example (which has been exposed by default prior to 8.10). Is there actually any

Re: Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2008-01-08 13:26, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerahmy Pocott wrote: Hello, From the sendmail documentation: There are always users that need to be exposed -- that is, their internal site name should be displayed instead of the masquerade name. Root is an example (which

Re: Sendmail: exposed root, why?

2008-01-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2008-01-08 13:26, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerahmy Pocott wrote: From the sendmail documentation: There are always users that need to be exposed -- that is, their internal site name should be