I've just noticed that for the last month Exim does not appear to have been
using SpamAssassin to check incoming emails.
Previously all my incoming emails contained the following headers:
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From:
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:
But I'm
/5.14.1/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got
/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 86.
BEGIN
/perl5/5.14.1/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/lib/perl5
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you upgrade perl from 5.10.x
or 5.12.x to 5.14.1. This is explained in UPDATING.
If you
On 23 Jun 2011, at 21:37, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you
This is the other question: how do I get the builtin SpanAssassin
working? sendmail is working and I've built mail/p5-SpamAssassin
[or whatever]. Still getting spam. Also, when /etc/mail/* starts
up, on the console I notice a warning saying something like
Can't find Xspamassassin
All lower
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with Spamassassin
and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it is being
delivered to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some good
documentation to configure mail marked as spam to a different directory.
Are there any
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:42:51 + (UTC)
AN a...@neu.net wrote:
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with
Spamassassin and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it
is being delivered to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some
good documentation
2010/11/17 AN a...@neu.net:
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with Spamassassin
and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it is being delivered
to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some good documentation to
configure mail marked as spam
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore and
exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of a
PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore
and exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of
a PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems that after the upgrade, sa-update has to be run
Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'll add your patches and post an updated shar later on.
Done.
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one script required,
There is an apparent bug in 'spamassassin' regarding 2010 e-mails. The
full story is available here:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/.
There is also a discussion of it on SlashDot:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/01/02/0027207/SpamAssassin-2010-Bug
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:19:55 -0500
Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote:
There is an apparent bug in 'spamassassin' regarding 2010 e-mails. The
full story is available here:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/.
There is also a discussion of it on SlashDot:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/01/02
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I just
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks
Matt Emmerton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin
from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said
yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find
nor in /etc/periodic or /usr/local/etc/periodic.
You need some
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
However, neither of these have been accepted by the
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
channels you use and whether you want sa-compile
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
However, neither of these have been accepted by the
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
I've submitted a PR for this, but email administrators who use SpamAssassin may
wish to take immediate action.
There is a SpamAssassin rule which treats messages with dates after 2009 as
far in the future. This adds about 3 points to the SA score, so is very
substantial.
I've posted details
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
There is discussion on the SA mailing list, and it is likely that
some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
use sa-update.
It's already available in sa-update.
am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin from
ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said yes), but I
don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find nor in /etc/periodic or
/usr/local/etc/periodic.
I'm on 8-STABLE.
Cheers,
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberg
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing
SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do
this (I said yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab
I can find nor
whitelists as
you
describe here, but the auto_whitelist file really is maintained by SA only, and
it's
in Berkeley DB format.
Here's how it works:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
Ruben
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:30:47 +
Marwan Sultan dead_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
If you run spamd as root
Guys,
my network guy suggests this is ONE way of creating a
.spamassassin file. Is there a better way than this:
mkdir /root/.spamassassin
chmod 775 /root/.spamassassin
chown root:spamd /root/.spamassassin
what's the consensus, mail
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
in your local.cf
add the lines
auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
bayes_path /var/spool
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:30:47AM +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
i think everyone uwho uses spamassassim would
Hi Gary,
just to be complete++, :-), you mean
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
, is this correct??
Yes, You are 100% Correct :)
would you check my tying to see if i've made any mistakes?
Again, Correct :)
another question: are these the same perms, 0755, as before
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:21:53 -0800,
Andrew Moran snee...@mac.com said:
A Thank you for your suggestion. I'll try compiling Perl and it's
A dependencies without using PERL_MALLOC.
I've had similar memory problems using Hyperestraier to index
collections exceeding 1,000,000 documents.
(current):
datasize 8388608 kB
[r...@celebrian ~]#
I rebooted, but still see my memory being chewed up. Almost
immediately after booting, one of my spamassassin processes spun out
of control. Here's the top with it eating 16 gigs of memory:
PIDUIDTHR PRI NICE SIZE
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
usable state at
all times. 4G should be enough for any process and
In Mar 3, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Mel wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
usable state at
all times. 4G
memory being chewed up. Almost
immediately after booting, one of my spamassassin processes spun out
of control. Here's the top with it eating 16 gigs of memory:
PIDUIDTHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND
1611 1030 1 680 15062M 818M CPU2 2 0:44
/loader.conf
kern.maxdsiz=8G
kern.defdsiz=4G
celebrian#
Can you show limits -H -d?
I rebooted, but still see my memory being chewed up. Almost
immediately after booting, one of my spamassassin processes spun out
of control. Here's the top with it eating 16 gigs of memory:
PIDUID
Andrew Moran wrote:
[...]
Has anyone heard of this? Or any pointers on what I can do to figure
out what is causing it?
Your advice is much appreciated.
As an alternative:
You could try mail/mimedefang. It calls spamassassin to evaluate an
e-mail but without having it running all
having memory issues.
My current one is that SpamAssassin seems to be periodically eating
up all my memory, causing the server to slow to a crawl until the
kernel kills the process and then I have enormous amounts of free
memory. Rinse, repeat. I thought maybe it had something to do
On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Mel wrote:
This is hard to debug, but I'd first toggle the PERL_MALLOC option
in the
configuration dialog for the perl port. If this doesn't solve the
problem,
then you'd have to get a ktrace to get some indication of what is
allocating
the memory.
Thank
is that SpamAssassin seems to be periodically eating
up all my memory, causing the server to slow to a crawl until the
kernel kills the process and then I have enormous amounts of free
memory. Rinse, repeat. I thought maybe it had something to do with
the fact that I was using multithreaded perl
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:58:37 -0800
Tankko tan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
Before I go though
I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
Before I go though and hand correct these one by one, I thought I'd
ask if I was doing something
On Monday 16 February 2009 08:58:37 Tankko wrote:
I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
Before I go though and hand correct
We need the line that says:
=== p5-IO-INET6 depends on file
That line is probably faulty.
This is the closest thing I can find to p5-IO-INET6 in the build output.
=== Installing for p5-Net-DNS-0.65
=== p5-Net-DNS-0.65 depends on executable: ipcount - found
=== p5-Net-DNS-0.65 depends
On Monday 16 February 2009 10:04:43 Tankko wrote:
We need the line that says:
=== p5-IO-INET6 depends on file
That line is probably faulty.
This is the closest thing I can find to p5-IO-INET6 in the build output.
=== Installing for p5-Net-DNS-0.65
=== p5-Net-DNS-0.65 depends on
/5.8.8, so I ran:
pkg_delete -f p5-Socket6-*
pkgdb -F
portupgrade p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
and I get the following errors:
---cut---
Writing Makefile for IO::Socket::INET6
=== Building for p5-IO-Socket-INET6-2.56
cp lib/IO/Socket/INET6.pm blib/lib/IO/Socket/INET6.pm
Manifying blib/man3/IO::Socket
list here.
I ran the grep, and it did come back with site_perl/5.8.8, so I ran:
pkg_delete -f p5-Socket6-*
pkgdb -F
portupgrade p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
and I get the following errors:
---cut---
Writing Makefile for IO::Socket::INET6
=== Building for p5-IO-Socket-INET6-2.56
cp lib/IO
or the make install command line.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/p5-Socket6.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/p5-IO-INET6.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/dns/p5-Net-DNS.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/dns/p5-Net-DNS.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
Same issue, different package. Apparently perl-after-upgrade didn't do it's
job.
I would:
portupgrade -f p5-*
Then go back to upgrade spamassasin.
--
Mel
OK, this solved the problem. Everything upgrades fine now. Thank
you very much for all your help. Not sure why this happened in the
After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
arriving again.
I haven't seen posts on this topic - I wonder if anyone has a guess as to
where to look for answers on this.
I am guessing if there is some way
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:43:21 -0500
David Banning da...@skytracker.ca wrote:
After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
arriving again.
I haven't seen posts on this topic - I wonder if anyone has a guess
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:27:01 +
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:43:21 -0500
David Banning da...@skytracker.ca wrote:
After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
arriving
Hello, I just installed SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 7.1 and am
encountering an error with autolearn. It always says failed when
attempting to learn. I followed the documentation for setting it up
but I'm wondering if I missed something. Possibly the Bayes DB was not
created? Or is this something I
Tom Stuart wrote:
Hello, I just installed SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 7.1 and am
encountering an error with autolearn. It always says failed when
attempting to learn.
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
___
freebsd-questions
thnx Philip, your config will help in my current setup.
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date
Hi James,
I remove spamc on .procmailrc and I can see lots of improvements!
Thanx,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:07 AM
lyd mc
That says you are driving spamd into swapping. The two canonical
reasons for SpamAssassin to be really slow are dead BL sites or
overrunning memory and going into heavy swapping. You made a
change to reduce the amount of swapping. Hence you probably have
too many children at any one time.
Modify
Hi guys,
Last day my mail server became very slow. I haven't found any mysterious
errors/warnings in /var/log/message and maillog. When I disable spammilter in
sendmail it became fast.
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
FEATURE
iLast day my mail server became very slow. I haven't found any
mysterious errors/warnings in /var/log/message and maillog. When I
disable spammilter in sendmail it became fast.
Normally this happens to me when I a DNS based RBL suddenly goes
out of action.
I know it won't solve your problem,
Thanks edwin. I better watch those dns rbl feature..
Regards,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spamassassin very slow
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Cc: lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008
: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:08 AM
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
this:
So if I'm understanding you correctly.. your calling spamc from a sendmail
milter
James Tanis wrote:
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
this:
The following setup by the front line mx's (2 of them
Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from
the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or
the p5-Mail SpamAssassin plug-in. They both do
I've got a very plain and standard sendmail configuration running on a
machine as a primary mail exchanger. After years of running without any
kind of automated spam filtering, it's just gotten too poor and I have
to turn to rejecting mail.
I installed the spamassassin and new-amavisd port, set
installed the spamassassin and new-amavisd port, set the basic
configuration options, turned them on, and it doesn't seem to do anything.
My test has been to tell it to tag messages even with a threshold of
zero, and nothing is ever tagged.
Has anyone got a walk through or good document on getting
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the p5-Mail
SpamAssassin plug-in. They both do the same, but is one
At 04:10 PM 4/11/2008, Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the
ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the
p5-Mail SpamAssassin
the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the p5-Mail
SpamAssassin plug-in. They both do the same, but is one a better way than
/11/2008, Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the
ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the
p5-Mail SpamAssassin plug
Hello,
I must export a SpamAssassin configuration in a GNU/Linux Debian 4.0.
See these files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin # file *
auto-whitelist: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order)
auto-whitelist.mutex: ASCII text
bayes_journal:ASCII text
bayes.mutex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
However, when I use these files in my ~/.spamassassin, on my FreeBSD, I
have errors:
spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate
file type
Matthew Seaman a écrit :
You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as you were
using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules SpamAssassin
uses for BerkeleyDB access to use that version too.
I use the same BerkeleyDB. I use db41 on FreeBSD (and db41
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Matthew Seaman a écrit :
You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as
you were
using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules
SpamAssassin
uses for BerkeleyDB access to use
Hey Drew!
I learned long time ago to drop SpamAssassin altogether. I got hundreds of spam
e-mails a day with SpamAssassin.
But when I switched to a clean Postfix installation with Greylist (port 10023)
and 3 different blocklist servers, my spams reduced to 0 a day, or 1-3 at most.
$ cat /usr
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8: Undefined symbol
PL_exit_flags
You may consider updating every Perl modules after you have upgraded
Perl 5.8.8.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
to be with spamassassin.
When I run spamassassin -D --lint from the command line, everything _seems_
to check out. However, when I run mailscanner --lint it segfaults:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](/)# mailscanner --lint
Checking version numbers...
Version number in MailScanner.conf (4.64.3) is correct.
Your
acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/nonexistent/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.acsvfbsd02.acutronic.ch.53289
for /nonexistent//.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: No such file or directory
Jan 31 17:21:42
: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/nonexistent/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.acsvfbsd02.acutronic.ch.53289
for /nonexistent//.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: No such file or directory
Jan 31 17:21:42 acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: spamd: clean message (0.0/7.0) for
root:65534 in 6.2
On 8/25/07, Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:26 PMAug 24, 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
[snip]
an easier way is to run spamassassin under the control of amavisd-new
and let amavisd-new add address extensions such as user+spam and to
let dovecot file the mail
On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:26 PMAug 24, 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
[snip]
an easier way is to run spamassassin under the control of amavisd-new
and let amavisd-new add address extensions such as user+spam and to
let dovecot file the mail in a spam folder.
Noel,
Are you saying I just need amavisd
--On August 24, 2007 8:32:01 AM -0500 Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey,
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
TIA for any help!
What is it that you want to do?
Paul Schmehl
Hey,
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
TIA for any help!
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
___
freebsd-questions
Eric
why not stick with an MTA you know?
--
martin
On 8/24/07, Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
TIA for any help!
-
Eric F
On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
Define funky!
Before you start asking questions regarding configuring Postfix, it
might
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:05 AMAug 24, 2007, Gerard wrote:
On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
Define funky!
Before you start asking
On Aug 24, 2007, at 8:46 AMAug 24, 2007, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Eric
why not stick with an MTA you know?
Martin,
I've switched to postfix due to some of the features it supports.
Thanks for your concern, though.
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
Eric Crist wrote:
This is also a reply to Paul Schmehl.
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory with a users
maildir. I've done
On August 24, 2007 at 10:34AM Eric Crist wrote:
{snip]
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm
looking for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets,
so that I can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory
with a users maildir. I've
--On Friday, August 24, 2007 09:46:32 -0500 Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eric Crist wrote:
This is also a reply to Paul Schmehl.
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
can route any
Eric Crist wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:05 AMAug 24, 2007, Gerard wrote:
On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
can route any
on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory with a users
maildir.
Assuming you got SA running:
In my main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
This is in my header_checks:
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT [EMAIL
it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam
Although I'm subscribed user of mailing lists.
What should I do?
Hi ytriffy,
You're posting from gmail.com. That's a known public email domain,
that is. I would guess you'd get the same problem coming
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
