I have this message that has showed up in the security run output
I don't really know what It means ?
backup.xxx.fr kernel log messages:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Any idea ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Bernard
Sent: 06 November 2003 11:21
I have this message that has showed up in the security run output
I don't really know what It means ?
backup.xxx.fr kernel log messages:
dc0: TX underrun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
What does this mean?
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this mean?
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Is the answer in the dc(4) manual insufficient?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
- Original Message -
From: default013 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:42:45 -0600
To: FreeBSD-Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TX underrun
I recently moved my server from a 384 SDSL line to a colocation facility.
Since the move, I've been receiving these messages about
hi
i get the following error
l0: transmissions error: 90
xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes
when trying to ftp a large tar.gz file to a dell poweredge network storage appli
ance.
the commands i'm using to upload this large tar.gz file are:
ftp -n -v
Doug Reynolds wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:17:01 +0100 (CET), Marc Schneiders wrote:
[ ... ]
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes
xl1: transmission error: 90
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes
does that mean it is increasing or decreasing
DEcreases at an underrun.
It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes
xl1: transmission error: 90
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes
does that mean it is increasing or decreasing?
---
doug reynolds | the maverick
to automatically increase the buffers to say
like 256 bytes?
Mine automatically DEcreases at an underrun.
It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes
xl1: transmission error: 90
xl1: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, at 22:27 [=GMT-0500], Doug Reynolds wrote:
On 17 Jan 2003 00:08:11 +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
does anyone know of a way to automatically increase the buffers to say
like 256 bytes?
Mine automatically DEcreases at an underrun.
It's a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL.
Hi,
Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
anyone know what it means?
Thanks,
Marco
--
Might as well be frank, monsieur. It would take a miracle
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:22, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
anyone know what it means?
This is a message
At 11:22 PM 1.16.2003 +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just curious what it means. Does
anyone know what it means?
Thanks,
Marco
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, the wise Stacey Roberts spoke, and said:
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:22, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I noticed a kernel message on one of my machines:
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
It doesn't seem to be very important. I'm just
On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
more efficient nic would see these messages off.
Could it also be the cable? I once had these messages on a colocated
machine, occasionally, and they went away
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
more efficient nic would see these messages off.
Could it also be the cable? I once had these
Hi Marco,
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 23:51, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
more efficient nic would
Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, the wise Marc Schneiders spoke, and said:
On 16 Jan 2003, at 22:35 [=GMT-], Stacey Roberts wrote:
Nothing to worry about, but either reducing system load .., or buying a
more efficient nic would see these messages
On 17 Jan 2003 00:08:11 +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
I only had one message like this, so I think it would be best to wait and
see if i get message mor often. I think my cables are OK.
Is this a Linksys nic? I only ask because the only occasion that *I*
have heard of this becoming a problem
- Original Message -
From: bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:54:48 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dc0: TX underrun
question 1:) I keep getting this message??
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Is this normal or do I need to buy a better nic
question 1:) I keep getting this message??
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Is this normal or do I need to buy a better nic? It's currently a Linksys
10/100 pci nic ?
question 2:) Also any newer links to using freebsd as a router/firewall
using 4.7-RELEASE ?
question 3:) is tripwire
23 matches
Mail list logo
