On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric P. Scott) wrote:
[Jeffrey Goldberg]
As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to
exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but
that isn't enough to justify its continued use.
I have
[Jeffrey Goldberg]
As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to
exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but
that isn't enough to justify its continued use.
I have very good connectivity to several FTP-only mirror sites,
and relatively poor
I asked how to pass the -p argument to fetch when doing a port upgrade.
Answers here, and further digging confirm that the presuppositions
behind my question were wrong.
First of all, the problem that I was having had nothing to do with
active vs passive FTP. I had butchered all FTP
On 2007/03/21 14:29, Jeffrey Goldberg seems to have typed:
Rant
As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to
exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but
that isn't enough to justify its continued use.
Qualification
Of course having
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:29:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Rant
As far as I can tell this and many other configuration options are not
documented anywhere outside of the .mk files themselves. Is that
really how
things should be?
/Rant
Let me tell you a totally awesome secret:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:45:39 -0800
Peter A. Giessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/03/21 14:29, Jeffrey Goldberg seems to have typed:
Rant
As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to
exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but
that isn't
On Mar 21, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:29:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Rant
As far as I can tell this and many other configuration options
are not
documented anywhere outside of the .mk files themselves. Is that
really how
things should be?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:52:51PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:29:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Rant
As far as I can tell this and many other configuration options
are not
documented anywhere
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:27:19 -0400
Chris Slothouber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On my perimeter firewall, I default deny outbound traffic. This
cuts off fetching using active FTP. Is there some way that I can
tell portupgrade to pass the -p flag to
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:04:16 -0500
Jeffrey Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my perimeter firewall, I default deny outbound traffic. This
cuts off fetching using active FTP. Is there some way that I can
tell portupgrade to pass the -p flag to fetch?
This doesn't make any sense unless you
On my perimeter firewall, I default deny outbound traffic. This cuts
off fetching using active FTP. Is there some way that I can tell
portupgrade to pass the -p flag to fetch?
I know that I can temporarily change my firewall rules, but I think
that it would be a cleaner solution to just
Hi Jeffrey,
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On my perimeter firewall, I default deny outbound traffic. This cuts
off fetching using active FTP. Is there some way that I can tell
portupgrade to pass the -p flag to fetch?
I know that I can temporarily change my firewall rules, but I think that
it
12 matches
Mail list logo
