For you to ask that question shows without a doubt that it has
been too long since you have sat back, put on Pink Floyd,
taken a few bong hits, and contemplated the Universe.
Touché.
-Modulok-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Modulok
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:35 AM
To: Tino Engel
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2,1 is
forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 11:29:01 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
For you to ask that question shows without a doubt that it has
been too long since you have sat back, put on Pink Floyd,
taken a few bong hits, and contemplated the Universe.
Thanks for cheering up my workday! ;-)
--
Heiko
snip
Code re-use is a good thing. Intricate, far-reaching dependencies are
not. While package managers attempt to mitigate the underlying issue,
using code re-use as an excuse for the fragility of a system design,
is unfortunate. I do not pretend to have all of the answers, but I
feel that
-Original Message-
From: Tino Engel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 16 December 2007 4:53 AM
To: Remko Lodder
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; W. D.; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code
Execution
Remko Lodder schrieb:
On Fri, December 14, 2007 5:37 pm, W. D. wrote:
At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote:
W. D. wrote:
Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated
in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is
3.0.28.
Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated
in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is
3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports
version stuck at 3.0.26a_2,1?
If there are fixes available already on the Samba websites,
why can't they be
On 12/14/2007, W. D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When is it going to be fixed? Does soon mean this century?
This year? When?
Wow... someone needs to think before they speak.
This is free software. You are in no position to make demands or whine
about things like this.
Besides - you're
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:10AM -0600, W. D. wrote:
At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote:
W. D. wrote:
Dang! When will this be fixed?
Soon, there are patches available, we just need to make sure that it
doesn't bite anything while we are in a ports-slush, hence the FORBIDDEN
On Fri, December 14, 2007 5:37 pm, W. D. wrote:
At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote:
W. D. wrote:
Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated
in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is
3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports
version
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of W. D.
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Remko Lodder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2,1 is forbidden: Remote
On 12/14/07, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This happens from time to time with the FreeBSD ports system, and
there isn't any way to avoid it. Most open source software
today is written to depend on other open source software
packages. People don't like spending programming time
-Original Message-
From: Modulok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:29 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
