On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
At present I have reduced the email to a textual format with an
embedded textual link. So the email looks like
Your Document,
Thank you for your inquiry. below is a link to the brochures as
requested, in Adobe Acrobat format.
It
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
these all sound very reasonable. However, we use the same IP for
several virtual hosts ie we have more than one domain name so the
reverse DNS is not clear to me. Is the from address inspected for
comparison with the RDNS ie if I claim to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robin Becker wrote:
these all sound very reasonable. However, we use the same IP for several
virtual hosts ie we have more than one domain name so the reverse DNS is
not clear to me. Is the from address inspected for comparison with the
RDNS ie
On Friday 12 October 2007 16:40:10 Robin Becker wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
[snip IP/hostname issues answered sufficiently by others]
Automatic mailing is fine. What is important is how the email addresses
were acquired.
..
this isn't automatic, the sales people manually enter
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
At present I have reduced the email to a textual format with an
embedded textual link. So the email looks like
..
When you personalize that give the date and IP address of the request.
Something like
...
We have a project to make a graphical tool which allows salespersons to send an
email with an attached PDF document. We are in testing and although the tool
seems to work we have the problem of not looking like spam/phish etc etc. I have
tried numerous tricks to avoid being classified as spam,
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
these all sound very reasonable. However, we use the same IP for
several virtual hosts ie we have more than one domain name so the
reverse DNS is not clear to me. Is the from address inspected for
comparison with the
Robin Becker wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
The checking will work fine with virtual domains. What matters is that
DNS(rDNS(IP)) = IP = DNS(vhost)
I think I've got that right. (It's a bit more complicated to state
when MXes and multiple A records for the same name are considered,
