On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Peter Toth free...@snap.net.nz wrote:
There is still a way to increase NFS performance in 9.0 (without a ZIL
SSD) by setting zfs property sync=disabled, which will disable
synchronous writes - comes with some risks, research it before switching
it off. Also,
On 06/24/11 10:17, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
As a rule of thumb and for a serious server, I would recommend 1 SSD as
dedicated cache and 2 SSD for a mirrored ZIL (you don't want to lose this
data).
However I think ppl posted
On Wed, June 22, 2011 9:26 pm, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You will lose your main ZFS pool if you lose:
- more than 1 of your full ZFS pools
or
- your ZIL (need confirmation on that)
From my reading, on the ZIL: Under 8.2, true. If you have patched your
ZFS install, or are running -CURRENT,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
As a rule of thumb and for a serious server, I would recommend 1 SSD as
dedicated cache and 2 SSD for a mirrored ZIL (you don't want to lose this
data).
However I think ppl posted about running intro trouble when using both
Hi all, I'm planning to change my data NFS server. For 60 clients.
I wanted to serv NFS for data over NFS and also for diskless host
(http://projets.mathrice.org/faddef/cgi-bin/trac.cgi).
Here is the harware I chose :
a little proc : 1.6 Ghz Xeon 4 coeurs (mono)
: It's seems that on a such
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:41:58 -0500, Michel Le Cocq
miconof80.l...@gmail.com wrote:
speedy disk : Sas 15K
: to limit IO Wait
The more spindles the better. Get more disks if possible.
Regards,
Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hello.
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D acceleration without binary drivers? My needs are quite minimal,
I'm not running any games.
As far as I can tell, only onboard Intel graphics
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D acceleration without binary drivers? My needs are quite minimal,
I'm not running any games.
you actually need 3D accelerator or just fast 2D card?
On 20081025 10:18:01, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D acceleration without binary drivers? My needs are quite minimal,
I'm not running any games.
you
afaik openGL always requires local display
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20081025 10:18:01, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20081025 10:18:01, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D acceleration without binary drivers? My needs are
On 20081025 11:48:02, Bruce Cran wrote:
I would guess the development and testing will be done on the same machine.
--
Bruce
If that was a question, then yeah, you're correct.
It seems that I can actually get open acceleration using the r500 series
of ATI cards (the X1950 is the most
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:48:58AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I'm looking to buy a new workstation that needs to be able to run in
64-bit (long) mode (working with large data sets). What are my options
for 3D acceleration without binary drivers? My needs are quite minimal,
I'm
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
jekillen wrote:
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD does not yet support Marvell as of
v6.2. I did get a reference to a source for the driver source and
instructions to compile and install.
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD does not yet support Marvell as of
v6.2. I did get a reference to a source for the driver source and
instructions to
Garrett Cooper wrote:
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD does not yet support Marvell as of
v6.2. I did get a reference to a source for the driver source and
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:18 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD does not yet support Marvell as of
v6.2. I did
jekillen wrote:
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
I have built a machine with ASUS M2N32 WS pro motherboard.
It has dual network interface ports that are Marvell interfaces.
I understand that FreeBSD does not yet support Marvell as of
v6.2. I did get a
I'm putting together a new FreeBSD server ... decided to go 1U this time,
and just ran into a snag ...
I'm using the Intel SE7520JR2 Mobo in an SR1400 chassis ... everything is
put together fine, but went to install my 3Ware 9500S-4LP controller, only
to find out that it doesn't fit ...
Has
Will FreeBSD 5.3 Run on this Hardware Configuration
CPU
Network Cards
I would also like to Hardware Raid 5 with the Intel Raid Card
Would this be seamless to FreeBSD?
5U Intel SC5300 Rack Mount Black
Dual Intel CPU Xeon 3GHz CPU, 64-bit, 1mb cache
Intel Gigabit Ethernet x 2
2 GB ECC memory
4 144GB
Hello All,
I am interested in playing with SMP and am curious if there is anyone
out there using the following combo with success:
Athlon AMSN2400Box
Gigabyte: GA-7DPXDW
I plan on using 4.8 for the moment.
Thanks in advance and please pardon the newbie nature of this
question.
Scott
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
mell miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all, i've just recently heard of bsd and am seriously considering going that way,
but before i go much further i have what is likely a stupid question but since in
the past i've disregarded such questions
hi all, i've just recently heard of bsd and am seriously considering going that way,
but before i go much further i have what is likely a stupid question but since in the
past i've disregarded such questions thinking they were unimportant or that the answer
was obvious only to later regret it i
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, mell miller wrote:
hi all, i've just recently heard of bsd and am seriously considering
going that way, but before i go much further i have what is likely a
stupid question but since in the past i've disregarded such questions
thinking they were unimportant or that the
Hi,
There are things called winmodems and winprinters which do require Windows
as some of the work the hardware would normally do is handeled on the CPU.
However I've found FreeBSD to work on 99% of the hardware I've chucked at
it without any problems. sometimes its take a bit of work to but
16, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Rus Foster
Cc: mell miller; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: software/hardware question
Hi,
There are things called winmodems and winprinters which do
require Windows
as some of the work the hardware would normally do is
handeled on the CPU.
However I've
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
Kenneth Wayne Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the ATI Raedon 7500 all in wonder, and finding out if the tv
tuner works in freebsd or not has been quite fruitless so far.
Google for gatos.
Except that the Gatos drivers i general need an
Except that the Gatos drivers i general need an patched linux DRM kernel
module and/or at least the Video4Linux linux kernel subsystem. To my
knowledge freebsd doesn't support either. (Although I'm a bit outdated
since i gave up on gatos and ATI-tuners/video inn/out chipsetts about a
year
Please wrap your lines around 72 characters or so. See:
http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
mell miller wrote:
hi all, i've just recently heard of bsd and am seriously considering going
that way, but before i go much further i have what is likely a stupid
question but since in the past i've
hi all, i've just recently heard of bsd and am seriously considering going
that way, but before i go much further i have what is likely a stupid
quesion but since in the past i've disregarded such questions thinking
they were unimportant or that the answer was obvious only to later regret
, December 20, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: Networking hardware question
Hi,
For one week, I have the responsability to administrate a LAN in a society
where there's at least 5 swithes and 1 hub connected together in chain. I
heard that plugging too many hubs or swithes in chain can cause network
Hi,
For one week, I have the responsability to administrate a LAN in a society
where there's at least 5 swithes and 1 hub connected together in chain. I
heard that plugging too many hubs or swithes in chain can cause network
stability problems.
Is that right, and what can I do. I have been
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:47, Christophe Simon wrote:
Hi,
For one week, I have the responsability to administrate a LAN in a society
where there's at least 5 swithes and 1 hub connected together in chain. I
heard that plugging too many hubs or swithes in chain can cause
Hello again.
Well, people said that dual P III 550 with SDRAM is
definetely slower than single P 4 3Ghz with DDR RAM.
Now, a bit trickier question.
Is DUAL P III 1,4Ghz with SDRAM faster than
SINGLE P4 3Ghz with hyperthreading and DDR RAM (PC 3200)?
How much it is slower or faster?
Regards,
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:29:15PM +0300, Artem Koutchine wrote:
Hello again.
Well, people said that dual P III 550 with SDRAM is
definetely slower than single P 4 3Ghz with DDR RAM.
Now, a bit trickier question.
Is DUAL P III 1,4Ghz with SDRAM faster than
SINGLE P4 3Ghz with
36 matches
Mail list logo
