RE: nslookup strangeness

Hi - thanks for the reply. The host in question runs named because it is also a secondary name server for the domains Safeport hosts. I also use it as the name server for our internal network. The error is that nslookup terminates after the message and that I apparently changed something

nslookup strangeness

I was using nslookup because of its convenient syntax to do some stuff. My workstation communicates via a gateway which also severs as its name server. I get the following: nslookup *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.3.1: Non-existent host/domain *** Can't find server name

RE: nslookup strangeness

@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: nslookup strangeness I was using nslookup because of its convenient syntax to do some stuff. My workstation communicates via a gateway which also severs as its name server. I get the following: nslookup *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.3.1: Non-existent host/domain

Re[2]: Sendmail host lookup problem (nslookup)

in the nameserver, or your TM /etc/resolv.conf on gc-infra is not using 192.168.0.29 as it's TM nameserver. TM What is the output of nslookup on gc-infra when you key in TM the bettchen.steenbuck.net name? What is it when you issue TM a set type=mx at the nslookup prompt followed by the TM

Re: nslookup not working on client machines only

not understand. When trying to $ nslookup google.com on a client host, here's what it says : 8-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] nslookup google.com *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.1: Non-existent host/domain *** Can't find server name for address ::: No response from server *** Default servers

Re: nslookup not working on client machines only

trying to $ nslookup google.com on a client host, here's what it says : 8-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] nslookup google.com *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.1: Non-existent host/domain *** Can't find server name for address ::: No response from server *** Default servers

nslookup not working on client machines only

Hello, I've set up a FreeBSD box to provide my home network a NAT access to the Internet and a DNS caching-only server with bind 8.3.7 (among other things). It's working perfectly but today I noticed something that I do not understand. When trying to $ nslookup google.com on a client host, here's

nslookup

is there a bsd tool that gives the domain name of an IP address? I know this will give me an ip of one of the google web servers. traceroute www.google.com thanks, bh ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: nslookup

Brian Henning wrote: is there a bsd tool that gives the domain name of an IP address? host? nslookup? -ste ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: nslookup

On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:56:29AM -0500, Brian Henning wrote: is there a bsd tool that gives the domain name of an IP address? I know this will give me an ip of one of the google web servers. traceroute www.google.com dig -x 12.34.56.78 - or - host 12.34.56.78 Note that rather

Re: nslookup

At 2004-04-15T13:58:52Z, Shaun T. Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nslookup? Don't use nslookup. It's a Bad Thing. -- Kirk Strauser 94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: nslookup

At 2004-04-15T13:58:52Z, Shaun T. Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nslookup? Don't use nslookup. It's a Bad Thing. I haven't heard that there is any specific evil involved, just that somewhere in the high court of those who pass judgement on such things, it has been decided

Re: nslookup

At 2004-04-15T18:35:47Z, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I haven't heard that there is any specific evil involved, just that somewhere in the high court of those who pass judgement on such things, it has been decided to phase out nslookup in favor of new utilities. Nope. nslookup

Re: nslookup

* Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-15 10:56]: At 2004-04-15T13:58:52Z, Shaun T. Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nslookup? Don't use nslookup. It's a Bad Thing. I really don't want to hijack this thread, but you've peaked my curiosity; can you elaborate? -- Joshua Is truth

make world doesn't build nslookup

For some reason, after make installworld, my whole system seems complete except for nslookup, which is still the old version. I have NO_BIND=true in make.conf, does that also mean client tools and libraries aren't built? -- TONI HEINONEN TELEWARE OY +358 40 836 1815 / +358 (9) 3434

nslookup and reverse lookup failure of nameserver under 5.2-RELEASE

While doing some post-install config on a new 5.2-RELEASE system, I encountered a problem where nslookup fails because it isn't able to perform a successful reverse lookup of the DNS server's IP. For example: $ nslookup www.freebsd.org *** Can't find server name for address 172.16.0.1: Non

Re: nslookup and reverse lookup failure of nameserver under 5.2-RELEASE

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:13:06AM -0800, Matthew Fremont wrote: The nameserver is working properly, and commands like dig(1), host(1), telnet(1), and ftp(1), are able to sucessfully resolve names. The problem appears to be isolated to nslookup(8). If memory serves me correctly, at some