On Jul 6, 2007, at 2:33 PM, RW wrote:
If this box is not the gateway, there is no point in doing anything
about this because they can simply turn-off proxying and go direct to
the internet.
However, on your gateway you can specify that only the proxy box is
allowed to connect to the web.
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 2:33 PM, RW wrote:
If this box is not the gateway, there is no point in doing anything
about this because they can simply turn-off proxying and go direct to
the internet.
However, on your gateway you can specify that only the proxy box is
allowed
hi,
Thank you all for your comments re FreeBSD as a parental control and
gateway server. I have both squid and dansguardian working and I am left
with configuring them to optimize web browsing and the desired level of
control.
I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning as a real gateway as I will be
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
hi,
Thank you all for your comments re FreeBSD as a parental control and
gateway server. I have both squid and dansguardian working and I am left
with configuring them to optimize web browsing and the desired level of
control.
I do not yet have FreeBSD
Hello,
Now, if someone just changes the port in their browser to 3128 (squid
proxy port), then all content filtering will be bypassed.
I have the same setup at home for my kids.
Check the /etc/ipnat.conf file to redirect all web traffic to your
FreeBSD_gateway_IP_address:8080 (assuming
Now, if someone just changes the port in their browser to 3128 (squid
proxy port), then all content filtering will be bypassed.
I have the same setup at home for my kids.
Check the /etc/ipnat.conf file to redirect all web traffic to your
FreeBSD_gateway_IP_address:8080 (assuming your FreeBSD box
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
hi,
Thank you all for your comments re FreeBSD as a parental control and
gateway server. I have both squid and dansguardian working and I am left
with configuring them to optimize web browsing and the desired level of
control.
I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:20:50 +0100, Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can use pf's redirection to catch all outbound traffic destined for
port 80:
rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $internal_net to !me port www -
$proxy_host port $proxy_port
Define the macros
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:20:07 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning as a real gateway as I will be
able to do it at a later stage. However, there is one thing that
leaves me wondering. In order to use the content filtering as
provided by
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it is
perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no escaping
possible! Thanks again!
Unless they reconfigure their browser to use one of
RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it is
perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no escaping
possible! Thanks again!
Unless they reconfigure their
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200
Peter Boosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it
is perfect solution as no client configuration is
RW wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200
Peter Boosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it
is perfect solution as no client configuration is
RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:20:07 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning as a real gateway as I will be
able to do it at a later stage. However, there is one thing that
leaves me wondering. In order to use the content filtering as
provided
14 matches
Mail list logo
