When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the
From: Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se
To: Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se
Cc: Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Diskless question
On 2013-09-14 15:41, Bernt
Hi, Reference:
From: Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 09:36:58 +0200
Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have a setup with a diskless machine and working, but I can not log in
as root on the diskless. How to proceed?
Log in as non root see what
fixed IP and hostname for the
DHCP clients based on the MAC addresses.
Best wishes
Eugene
-Original Message- From: Daniel Nang
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:16 PM
To: Adam Vande More
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network Question
That was easier than I
To: Adam Vande More
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network Question
That was easier than I thought. My initial approach already looked
something like
this, except that for the ip address I always put
-
Both computers can access the internet with no problems.
So far so good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net as in the given picture and also let them communicate with
each other e.g. via ssh?
machine1# ssh `ip of machine2`
--
Adam Vande More
, September 12, 2013 11:16 PM
To: Adam Vande More
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network Question
That was easier than I thought. My initial approach already looked
something like
this, except that for the ip address I always put the machine's name as in:
machine1# ssh u...@machine2
, September 13, 2013 10:28 PM
To: Eugene
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Daniel Nang
Subject: Re: Network Question
Eugene wrote:
Hi Daniel,
The easiest way is to check the LAN Config (or similar) page of the
router. They usually allow one to specify fixed IP and hostname for the
DHCP clients
Hi Damien (I'm sorry for delay)
Thanks for your comments (specially for the tips / experience with your
-STABLE boxes)
Regards,
Pablo Carboni.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
However minor the issue seems, I think it warrants a PR, if at least so
the entry
|
|
|
machine1.example.com --- Router --- machine.2.example.com
- DHCP -- DHCP -
Both computers can access the internet with no problems.
So far so good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net
--- machine.2.example.com
- DHCP -- DHCP -
Both computers can access the internet with no problems.
So far so good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net as in the given picture and also let them
good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net as in the given picture and also let them communicate with
each other e.g. via ssh?
machine1# ssh `ip of machine2`
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
the internet with no problems.
So far so good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net as in the given picture and also let them communicate with
each other e.g. via ssh?
machine1# ssh `ip of machine2`
--
Adam Vande More
-- DHCP -
Both computers can access the internet with no problems.
So far so good...
My question is, if I can simultaneously have the computers access
the net as in the given picture and also let them communicate with
each other e.g. via ssh?
machine1# ssh `ip of machine2`
There's the rub
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
There's the rub. How do you determine the IP address of the other machine?
Normally I look at /var/db/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases. Pretty much all of the home
routers also have the information accessible on it's administration
, 2013 11:16 PM
To: Adam Vande More
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network Question
That was easier than I thought. My initial approach already looked
something like
this, except that for the ip address I always put the machine's name as in:
machine1# ssh u...@machine2.example.com
Hello,
I have read through documentation and didn't find answer for my issue.
The issue is:
How to recognize kernel panic and dump memory state onto USB device using C
language?
It would be great if I get the answer.
Regards,
cid:image001.png@01CE518C.41DEB9F0
Paweł
I have added the following entry to /etc/gettytab file
test.std.115200:\
:ep:sp#4800:tc:Pc
And also I have changed /etc/ttys file
cuau3 /usr/libexec/getty test.std.115200cons25 on secure
I expect /dev/cuau3 device to use even parity and 4800 as speed, but when I
check the device
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:41:31 +0200, Pawel Sulewski wrote:
How to recognize kernel panic and dump memory state onto USB device using C
language?
The kernel has its own crash handling and will initiate the
writing of the proper image automatically. It will be stored
on the partition designated by
I have added the following entry to /etc/gettytab file
test.std.115200:\
:ep:sp#4800:tc:Pc
And also I have changed /etc/ttys file
cuau3 /usr/libexec/getty test.std.115200 cons25 on secure
I expect /dev/cuau3 device to use even parity and 4800 as speed, but when I
check the device
connections.
For more detail see sio(4), after all the detail about multi-port
serial cards and their master ports comes a couple of paragraphs describing
the devices associated with each serial port in detail.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
Thanks. Another question is how can I change
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 23:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Jack Mc Lauren jack.mclau...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks. Another question is how can I change the default values of e.g.
databits, stopbits and ... for the device? I can set the speed
in /etc/ttys.
Look at the man pages for sio and stty - all
Hi list
I'm trying to connect to my server via a serial port which is named ttyu6 under
FreeBSD. In order to do that, I've decided to change /etc/ttys file like this:
# Serial terminals
# The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
ttyu6 /usr/libexec/getty std.115200
Hi list
I'm trying to connect to my server via a serial port which is named ttyu6 under
FreeBSD. In order to do that, I've decided to change /etc/ttys file like this:
# Serial terminals
# The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
ttyu6 /usr/libexec/getty std.115200
Hi list
I'm trying to connect to my server via a serial port which is named ttyu6 under
FreeBSD. In order to do that, I've decided to change /etc/ttys file like this:
#Serial terminlas
#The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
ttyu6 /usr/libexec/getty std.115200
Hi list
I'm trying to connect to my server via a serial port which is named ttyu6 under
FreeBSD. In order to do that, I've decided to change /etc/ttys file like this:
ttyu6 std.115200 cons25 on secure
But I can not connect to my server with this configuration. But if I change
ttyu6 to
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 09:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Jack Mc Lauren jack.mclau...@yahoo.com wrote:
But I can not connect to my server with this configuration. But if I
change ttyu6 to cuau6, everything works fine! I don't understand the
difference, would you please explain the reason for me?
In
Jack Mc Lauren jack.mclauren at yahoo.com writes:
Hi list
I'm trying to connect to my server via a serial port which is named ttyu6
under FreeBSD. In order to do that,
I've decided to change /etc/ttys file like this:
ttyu6 std.115200 cons25 on secure
But I can not connect to
Hello!
I am curious about the special (count down numbers) at shutdown / sync.
Those nubmers is like 8 8 8 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.
Actually what do those numbers mean?
Thanks and regards,
Patrick Dung
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:30:29 +0800 (SGT), Patrick Dung wrote:
I am curious about the special (count down numbers) at shutdown / sync.
Those nubmers is like 8 8 8 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.
Actually what do those numbers mean?
Those numbers show you how many buffers have to be synced
until the
Thanks for the answer.
That is cool and unique.
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
To: Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Question about
Hi,
by chance anyone know what's up with this.. could save me some
troubleshooting time..
Here's a 9.2 machine.
# uname -a
FreeBSD do.burplex.com 9.2-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253773M: Mon Jul 29
14:22:34 PDT 2013 da3m0n8...@do.burplex.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KAGISO
amd64
# sqlite3
Note that, as opposed to you, I'm tracking 8-STABLE and not 8.4-RELEASE !
UPDATING:
$FreeBSD: src/UPDATING,v 1.632.2.39 2013/08/23 15:21:39 svnexp Exp $
newvers.sh:
# $FreeBSD: src/sys/conf/newvers.sh,v 1.83.2.25 2013/08/07 08:26:07 svnexp
Exp $
I'll check our clusters of firewalls to see if
Dear Damien,
I use to install and update 'Releng' releases (plus patches, but not
stable releases) in our production servers (Ok, I agree stable is fine, but
my main reason is to be conservative under some circunstances).
(BTW, You're right, on 8-STABLE branch, it appears the 'missing' line I
However minor the issue seems, I think it warrants a PR, if at least so the
entry is added for the next revision of 8.4-RELEASE.
Regarding -STABLE, while I respect your decision to be conservative and run
-RELEASE, I'd like to point out we've not run into any problem here, in
over 3 years with
Dear Sirs,
Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with no luck.
Maybe I've made a mistake and I was looking inside a wrong file/url?
It doesn't appear, neither
From:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 75631 Aug 27 12:46 /usr/src/UPDATING
20130607:
8.4-RELEASE.
On 3 September 2013 18:16, Pablo Carboni pcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sirs,
Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside
Hello Damien,
(First at all, thanks for your response).
I do not want to insist too much with this silly thing, but(just in
case)
I've updated my sources today from
svn0.us-west.freebsd.org(base/releng/8.4), - previously to my first
e-mail - and:
(Argentina's current TZ is GMT-3)
% uname -a
FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC 2013
r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
% clang++ --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2
Thread model: posix
% uname -a
FreeBSD cobalt.corp.nai.org 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24
20:25:04 UTC 2013 r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
% clang++ --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2
% uname -a
FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC 2013
r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
% clang++ --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2
Thread model: posix
Subject: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 future header not found
% uname -a
FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC
2013
r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
% clang++ --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:22:49 +0800 (SGT) Quark wrote:
% uname -a
FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC
2013 r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
% clang++ --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502)
AFAIK, the easiest way to get C++11 support in clang is to use libc++ (see
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/theraven/2013/01/03/the-new-c-stack-in-9-1/).
See also
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2013-May/000841.html .
2013/8/27 Quark unixuser2000-f...@yahoo.com
% uname -a
- Original Message -
From: Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org
To: Quark unixuser2000-f...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 future header not found
On Tue, 27
On 08/22/13 17:46, Matt Miller wrote:
We ran into the following scenario in an application recently and were
wondering if the behavior of kern_jail_set() is as expected here.
This was an application bug where we were in, say, the JID 1 context
and tried to call jailparam_set() with the flags
We ran into the following scenario in an application recently and were
wondering if the behavior of kern_jail_set() is as expected here.
This was an application bug where we were in, say, the JID 1 context
and tried to call jailparam_set() with the flags (JAIL_CREATE |
JAIL_UPDATE) and the jid
Sir:
I would like to know if your freebsd OS 9.1 suite on CD(DVD) can be installed,
and then run, on a Dell Inspiron 531S? I looked-over your website, and did not
see a citation for that specific PC (though I did see it for others).
For your reference, my PC has a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual
I would like to know if your freebsd OS 9.1 suite on CD(DVD) can be installed,
and then run, on a Dell Inspiron 531S? I looked-over your website, and did
+not see a citation for that specific PC (though I did see it for others).
For your reference, my PC has a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual core
Hi,
I'm currently writing a USB driver for the SFML framework. I'm reading
the code of SDL and seen the usage of usbhid.
However, /usr/include/usbhid.h and /usr/include/dev/usb/usbhid.h are
different. But they have both some common functions and the same data
definition.
For instance, enum and
Hello list,
Im trying to install control-m agent on FreeBSD doing some searching i
didnt find anything that point to me to a sucessfull installation.
I would really appreciate if someone can give to me a clue or some recipe
or some howto !!
Arquitecture is:
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue
On 8 August 2013 17:15, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
Im trying to install control-m agent on FreeBSD doing some searching i
didnt find anything that point to me to a sucessfull installation.
I would really appreciate if someone can give to me a clue or
Ok thank you very much =)
Regards / Saludos.-
Leonardo Santagostini
http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini
2013/8/8 ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com
On 8 August 2013 17:15, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello list,
Im trying to install control-m agent on
Hello all,
I have to install in a probably not latest version BSD machine but when I try
to
pkg_add -r vim-lite
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/vim-lite.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
Hello all,
I have to install in a probably not latest version BSD machine but when I try
to
pkg_add -r vim-lite
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/vim-lite.tbz:
File
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
env
PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-releases/Latest/
pkg_add -r vim-lite
Thanks for the quick answer but I got the error:
env
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Pietro Paolini pulsarpie...@aol.comwrote:
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
env PACKAGESITE=
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-releases/Latest/pkg_add
-r vim-lite
Thanks
On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote:
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/
Yep, thanks a lot !
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Jul 23, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-07-23 18:07, Teske, Devin wrote:
(opening a can of squiggly worms here)
Well, then you can go fishing
This is a A sidenotnote
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
I was trying to use the content management system for our website. I needed to
restart on terminal but I keep coming up with the following error: I don't
know programing at all, so don't know if this is something I can fix.
Shared object libc.so.6 not found, required by fortune
Neither the
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:48:38 -0400, Rev Herbert Miller wrote:
I was trying to use the content management system for our website.
I needed to restart on terminal but I keep coming up with the
following error: I don't know programing at all, so don't know
if this is something I can fix.
In
things that touch /root content. System updating
might be one of them, but as it is typically run as root (and
even in SUM), restrictive permissions above the default are
no problem.
To summarize the answer for your question: It's just the default. :-)
I'll play Devil's advocate
for your question: It's just the default. :-)
I'll play Devil's advocate for a moment ;-)
One reason not to tighten ~root is because one might want
~root/httpuserfile to be readable by httpd to access the crypted
passwords of locked web page. ... ;-)
No not really, that's perverted, I
that touch /root content. System updating
might be one of them, but as it is typically run as root (and
even in SUM), restrictive permissions above the default are
no problem.
To summarize the answer for your question: It's just the default. :-)
I'll play Devil's advocate
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:25:44 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Before we might ask (via send-pr) for it to be commited,
we should various of us run
chmod 750 /root;chown root:wheel /root
give it a couple of months to see if problems.
Done years ago:
drwxr-x--- 7 root wheel 512
Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:25:44 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
( I'd guess OpenBSD might go for a tighter /root though, as they're
supposedly keen on security. )
Currently I've got no OpenBSD installation at hand to verify,
but I _assume_ they still have
Julian H. Stacey jhs at berklix.com writes:
jb.1234abcd at gmail.com 's ref to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578470
relates to Linux upgrade procedures /root
I don't see it affects how we should perceive an idealised Unix.
The upgrade was a canary that told the user
are
no problem.
To summarize the answer for your question: It's just the default. :-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
content. System updating
might be one of them, but as it is typically run as root (and
even in SUM), restrictive permissions above the default are
no problem.
To summarize the answer for your question: It's just the default. :-)
I'll play Devil's advocate for a moment ;-)
One reason
ASV asv at inhio.eu writes:
Mine
is just a concern about these permission defaults which look to me a bit
too relaxed and cannot find yet a reason why not to restrict it.
After all I believe having good default settings may make the difference
in some circumstances and/or save time.
I
This is a very 'trivial' question but it's bugging me since quite a
while now so I gotta ask.
There's any reason (and should be a fairly good one) why the /root
directory permissions by default are set to 755 (for sure on releases
8.0/8.1/9.0/9.1)
Thanks in advance
ASV:
This is a very 'trivial' question but it's bugging me since quite a
while now so I gotta ask.
There's any reason (and should be a fairly good one) why the /root
directory permissions by default are set to 755 (for sure on releases
8.0/8.1/9.0/9.1)
I imagine / needs those
On 06/26/13 15:47, Ayan George wrote:
ASV:
This is a very 'trivial' question but it's bugging me since quite a
while now so I gotta ask.
There's any reason (and should be a fairly good one) why the /root
directory permissions by default are set to 755 (for sure on releases
8.0/8.1/9.0/9.1
ASV a...@inhio.eu writes:
This is a very 'trivial' question but it's bugging me since quite a
while now so I gotta ask.
There's any reason (and should be a fairly good one) why the /root
directory permissions by default are set to 755 (for sure on releases
8.0/8.1/9.0/9.1)
By default
not be public).
There are few things that touch /root content. System updating
might be one of them, but as it is typically run as root (and
even in SUM), restrictive permissions above the default are
no problem.
To summarize the answer for your question: It's just the default. :-)
--
Polytropon
I have a ps/2 mouse attached to a HP mini-tower running FreeBSD 8.3, with
a stripped-down kernel (no loadable modules). I've apparently removed
something necessary for standard mouse functionality, but I have no clue as
to -what- is missing.
Gory details:
1) '/dev/psm0' exists and +is+ the
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:21:45 +0200
Subject: Re: mouse configuration question
From: Xavier xavierfreebsdquesti...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 02:09:13PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Hi Robert,
I have a ps/2 mouse attached to a HP mini-tower running FreeBSD 8.3,
with a stripped
There have been some excellent responses, and I just wanted to add a
quick point:
Virtual machines with VirtualBox work very well and avoid the problem of
trying to make compatible partition layouts. Enable sshd on FreeBSD and
get to the files with rsync or scp or some FUSE module on the
2013. június 19. 19:41 napon Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com írta:
There have been some excellent responses, and I just wanted to add a
quick point:
Virtual machines with VirtualBox work very well and avoid the problem of
trying to make compatible partition layouts. Enable sshd on
Hello:
I have a question regarding FreeBSD slices/partitions.
I have a disk with linux partitions with the following layout:
/dev/sda1 /
/dev/sda2 /home
/dev/sda3 /usr/local
/dev/sda5 swap
/dev/sda6 /home/user1
/dev/sda7 /home/user2
etc.
sda1, sda2, and sda3 are primary partitions, sda5
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Istvan Gabor suseuse...@lajt.hu wrote:
...
How can I do this in FreeBSD?
Can I have slices with only one partition occupying the whole slice?
Can I do something like the following:
/dev/ad0s1a /
/dev/ad0s2e /home
/dev/ad0s3e /usr/local
/dev/ad0s5b swap
2013. június 18. 19:49 napon Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com írta:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Istvan Gabor suseuse...@lajt.hu wrote:
...
How can I do this in FreeBSD?
Can I have slices with only one partition occupying the whole slice?
Can I do something like the following:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jun 18 13:47:50 2013
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_FreeBSD_slice/partiton_setup_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?question?=
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Istvan_Gabor?= suseuse...@lajt.hu
To: =?UTF-8?Q?FreeBSD_Questions?=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
=?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Sierchio?=ku
You can simply newfs the device itself, without a volume label, slice,
or partition. That's the normal thing to do with malloc devices, or
additional disks. If the disk doesn't require a boot loader, isn't
the root device, etc. that may be the best thing to do.
Your caution about EXT* is
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:48:20 +0200, Istvan Gabor wrote:
2013. június 18. 19:49 napon Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com írta:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Istvan Gabor suseuse...@lajt.hu wrote:
...
How can I do this in FreeBSD?
Can I have slices with only one partition
Hi all :-)
I just configurated logcheck and everything is perfect :-)
A question: where is the script that handle to send email?
I check also with pkg_info -L but I didn't see any script that send email
thanks for help!
Pol
___
freebsd-questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/13 4:16 PM, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
I just configurated logcheck and everything is perfect :-)
A question: where is the script that handle to send email?
I check also with pkg_info -L but I didn't see any script that send
email
If you include logcheck in a cron job (hourly, daily, etc.), the cron
system will send the email with its output.
After installed logcheck I didn't done any changes to cron... but I've
notify mails from logcheck
Thanks!
___
Where should site-specific, ie local, man pages live?
For instance, I have:
/usr/local/man/man1/php.1.gz
/usr/local/share/man/man1/php.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3597 May 6 00:38 /usr/local/man/man1/php.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3383 Dec 20 19:54 /usr/local/share/man/man1/php.1.gz
In the last episode (May 09), Paul Beard said:
Where should site-specific, ie local, man pages live?
For instance, I have:
/usr/local/man/man1/php.1.gz
/usr/local/share/man/man1/php.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3597 May 6 00:38 /usr/local/man/man1/php.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
On May 9, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
I don't have a /usr/local/share/man/ directory at all, and have 7300 files in
/usr/local/man/man?/ , so I'd say /usr/local/man/ is the correct location :)
I wish it were that simple here. /etc/manpath.config is unmodified
I installed 9.1-release amd 64 from the DVD. I intended to leave the obligatory
windows 7. I shrunk the primary windows partition and installed FreeBSD. I never
got an option to install the multi-partition boot record. Rather the install
overwrote the MBR with a boot record to boot FreeBSD.
On Mon, 6 May 2013, doug wrote:
I installed 9.1-release amd 64 from the DVD. I intended to leave the
obligatory windows 7. I shrunk the primary windows partition and installed
FreeBSD. I never got an option to install the multi-partition boot record.
Rather the install overwrote the MBR
it
got to rc.conf. The message was something like, deleting file hosts.allow no
longer in 8.3. Happily aborting the process left the system unchanged.
Aside from, what could I have done wrong? My question is should we be able to
trust freebsd-update on expired systems if it says a mirror exists
Quoting from /usr/ports/UPDATING:
20130502:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/pkg, ports-mgmt/poudriere, ports-mgmt/
tinderbox
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
This only affects people who are _building_ binary packages for pkgng. If
On 03/05/2013 21:26, Walter Hurry wrote:
Quoting from /usr/ports/UPDATING:
20130502:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/pkg, ports-mgmt/poudriere, ports-mgmt/
tinderbox
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
This only affects people
2013-04-25 16:03, krad skrev:
type id from your user account and paste the results back here
uid=1001(bernt) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody),0(wheel)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
type id from your user account and paste the results back here
On 24 April 2013 14:55, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
2013-04-24 15:40, Lowell Gilbert skrev:
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org writes:
On 04/24/13 14:07, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
No, that's from /etc/passwd
1 - 100 of 9091 matches
Mail list logo
